The US knew that Al-Qaeda and Al-Zarqawi had a "good relationship" with Saddam Hussein officials before the war:
Click to Enlarge
Page 67- Senate Intelligence
Committee Phase
II Report on Public Statements
This news from the WaPo today is as shocking as seeing Hillary
Clinton suspend her campaign.
Fred Hiatt at The Washington
Post reported- "Bush didn't lie!"
The
Anchoress is rubbing her head wondering what got into the media to suddenly
admit that Bush did not lie.She wrote a wonderful history of the antiwar crowds'
favorite chant about Bush and included this from 2003:
One reads this and thinks…it’s really too bad that when this story of Dems on the Intel
Committee plotting against Bush broke in 2003, the mainstream press ignored
it, taking umbrage that anyone would leak a memo (!) while ignoring its
content.
There's much more. Go read the whole thing, including a response from Senator Bond, over at Gateway Pundit.
7 comments:
ssshhhh, don't tell the stupid leftists. Their small brains will explode, no wait, that's a good thing, i'll spread the word.
Leftists, this is your brain.
(View of scrambled eggs sizzling and popping in a pan full of lard)
This is your brain on reality.
(view of Muslim pulling the strap on his bomb belt and exploding in a crowd full of hippies)
It has only been a few years....the reason given for the invasion of Iraq was "Non-Compliance with UN resolutions". The Iraq-Al Qaeda controversy was unoficial, and had to do with the uneducated, drugged-up DittoHeads on AM radio.
"This administration never said that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated between Saddam and al Qaeda," Bush said. "We did say there were numerous contacts between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda."
Put the controversy to bed and prepare to defend yourselves against another 8 years of Islamist leadership. What George Al Bushi started, both McCain and Obama will surely continue.
Think American, think of your children, and turn off Limbaugh.
Michael,
Just for the fact that Saddam's military shot at our jets every fucking day, they deserved to be destroyed.
But, the liberals can not keep such simple truths in their minds.
Read the above comment.
;-)
It is all a diversion from the important issues of today.....B.Hussein.O' and "No Borders" McCain.
May they both rot in hell, and be replaced by John Bolton.
(Anyway, as we saw outside the realm of American MainStreamMedia..Saddam himself declared that he had WMD's on a weekly basis. That being said, Saddam was the "second least worse" leader in the Middle East, our "Allies" are far more dangerous and commuted to the destruction of the United States)
Yes, I agree that our "allies" are worse.
However, I do not think that Bush invaded Iraq to get their oil. It doesn't make sense from a dollars and sense position.
It is likely he had a larger vision than we will ever see. His ability to execute his own strategy was destroyed by the "Bush lied, people died," liturgy.
The best way to execute this war, from a world economic standpoint, would be
Iraq - Iran/Syria - Saudi Arabia
coupled with
an agressive policy of drilling in the United States
Post a Comment