For weeks, the three wives of Mansa Musa Muhummed and most of their 19 children have been telling a jury countless stories of torture and starvation that they kept to themselves for years.More at the above link.
Muhummed sat in a desert courthouse with a hand over his face, shaking his head in denial as family members described being beaten, strung up by their feet and forced to eat vomit and feces.
"It is the worst case we've ever heard of," prosecutor Julie Baldwin said last week.
The alleged atrocities went undetected by social service agencies, and police now have Muhummed, 55, facing up to seven life sentences if convicted of a raft of abuse charges....
On broadcast after broadcast from the mainstream media and for week after week, we hear about the FLDS compound in Texas. But nothing about the above?
Sure, maybe Muhammed is innocent; stranger things have happened. On the other hand, maybe mentioning the name "Muhammed" is akin to not using other words now unacceptable to the politically correct.
2 comments:
I wonder if the 'newspeak campaign' which prohibits the use of terms such as:
jihadist
Islamic terrorists
Islamists
holy warriors
because using those words may "legitimize" or "aggrandize" the jihadist movement, is just one step closer to preventing analysts and intel from accessing web sites which routinely use the terms.
I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case. If not now, then later.
Post a Comment