During his time Lee Atwater was reviled by the democratic party because THEY CLAIM he had the nerve to claim Kitty Dukakis once burned an american flag at a protest (the worst we can say is that there is no proff he did that). What he did do, however, was Willie Horton.
Oh, the horror, imagine using a true item.
Today however, the democratic party and MSM are making that stuff look like offhand comments at a cocktail party.
The "Sarah Palin's baby is really her grandchild" story persists, and now we have CNN's John Roberts 'wondering' aloud how the governor would be able to care for her disabled child if elected. I wonder where his O button is. I wonder if someone who obviously doubts the ability of a working person to care for children, has the fortitude to be some kind of father. What a farce!
Moveon has OFFICIALLY backed untruths. The easily debunked Buchanan rumor, and promulgated a story originating with Media Matters (I know, I know ) that Palin vetoed a gay rights bill (She vetoed a bill which would BAN benefits for partners of gay people, a bill, BTW, passed by the republican legislature).This took about a minute to debunk with the original local news story -- so what is up with BOTH Moveon, and Media Matters? The latter even claims to be debunking an INCORRECT AP STORY !! Could it be that they quote each other because the truth will not serve? NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH !
And....
What's amazing is that there are two points to hit with, and they are real. She believes creationism should be taught along with Darwin ...sorry, but school is a place to teach iron hard science, not a fanciful relgious ideal.
Her statement on this during the run for Gov:
But, you know, if that's the ball game for the democrats going after her, they are in lot of trouble with this lady.
She won't be in favor of any giving $200 million dollars to Iran a month after 9/11 to curry favor and help show we are not attacking Islam (it's the other way around, Joe).
Say, is there any truth to the story that Obama is getting a hearing aid out of concern for all those Jeremiah Wright sermons he couldn't hear for 20 years?
I'm just wondering
Oh, the horror, imagine using a true item.
Today however, the democratic party and MSM are making that stuff look like offhand comments at a cocktail party.
The "Sarah Palin's baby is really her grandchild" story persists, and now we have CNN's John Roberts 'wondering' aloud how the governor would be able to care for her disabled child if elected. I wonder where his O button is. I wonder if someone who obviously doubts the ability of a working person to care for children, has the fortitude to be some kind of father. What a farce!
Moveon has OFFICIALLY backed untruths. The easily debunked Buchanan rumor, and promulgated a story originating with Media Matters (I know, I know ) that Palin vetoed a gay rights bill (She vetoed a bill which would BAN benefits for partners of gay people, a bill, BTW, passed by the republican legislature).This took about a minute to debunk with the original local news story -- so what is up with BOTH Moveon, and Media Matters? The latter even claims to be debunking an INCORRECT AP STORY !! Could it be that they quote each other because the truth will not serve? NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH !
And....
Alan, I really thought more of you.Fox News anchor Alan Colmes, of Hannity & Colmes, titled a recent post on his blog Liberaland "Did Palin Take Proper PreNatal Care?" In it, he wondered if she somehow was at fault for having a disabled child. Colmes took down the post after being attacked by the blog Wizbang and later reposted a screenshot of the blog to prove he "wasn't running away from what I posted."
What's amazing is that there are two points to hit with, and they are real. She believes creationism should be taught along with Darwin ...sorry, but school is a place to teach iron hard science, not a fanciful relgious ideal.
Her statement on this during the run for Gov:
Her abortion stance (as I know it), though she walks the walk, is simply unworkable. Abortions simply will never stop. The proof of this is the vast incomprehensibly large availability of birth control, and the continuance of of pregnancies which then are aborted. However, her stance on gay rights, despite any personal feelings (and I don't know what they are), should reassure voters that to Sarah Palin the govt is a place of laws, not men (or women)."I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum."
She added that, if elected, she would not push the state Board of Education to add such creation-based alternatives to the state's required curriculum.
But, you know, if that's the ball game for the democrats going after her, they are in lot of trouble with this lady.
She won't be in favor of any giving $200 million dollars to Iran a month after 9/11 to curry favor and help show we are not attacking Islam (it's the other way around, Joe).
Say, is there any truth to the story that Obama is getting a hearing aid out of concern for all those Jeremiah Wright sermons he couldn't hear for 20 years?
I'm just wondering
1 comment:
Who cares if the baby is Palin's daughter's child? I don't.
BTW, Jack Nicholson thought for years that his real mother was his sister. Similar situation. Of course, he wasn't running for political office.
Post a Comment