Why have american civil rights groups ignored the threat from.... , well, you know?

In a post yesterday I used the SPLC as one of the sources for questioning the wiseness of some counter jihad efforts which include those seeking a white europe as an end.

This caused some controversy here.

However, the point about the SPLC can and should be extended to the question in general .. why have groups interested in ensuring equal opportunity, and individual rights not only missed focusing on the efforts of groups like the muslim brotherhood here in the USA, but seem to be more concerned with protecting the rights of those whose ulitmating aim is probably Sharia?
The SPLC is a group which does highly analytical work on the origination motives of some crazy groups.

In this quarter's Intelligence report, they have an article on anti semitism on campus, something we here are very familiar with, and familiar with it as a component of something larger.
In this article, though very accurate as far they go, the farthest they go towards recognition is this:

Ali leads the Masjid al-Islam mosque in Oakland, Calif.; the mosque is part of the As-Sabiqun movement, which advocates "the establishment of Islam as a complete way of life in America."

They do not ask, why someone would advocate "the establishment of Islam as a complete way of life in America.". They do not pursue where this leads, as they have with other groups that have earned their attention.

But it would be ridiculous to single them out since the premier group in the USA which self identifies as protecting our individual rights, the ACLU is completely on the other side of the issue ... ensuring that Sharia as religious freedom makes inroads which are enforced in the workplace at swimming pools, etc., without ensuring that other religions are given equal 'rights'.

The NAACP? Nothing.
Rainbow Coalition? Are you kidding?
Urban League? NADA.
Who else is out there?

It is compulsory to recognize some facts.
In this election national security is the most important issue to 14%.
Of that 14%, how many question at heart the requirements that Qaradawi's and Khameinei's Islam place upon practitioner's as the main source of threat facing us? How many of that small 14% think it's a tiny minority of the misinformed responsible for their need to worry about national security?

Think Robert Spencer, and Daniel Pipes receive the kind of donations and public support those other groups do? No way, Jihadwatch ?... where the highly informed fringe go.

What we need, is an analog of COMMUNITY ORGANIZERS...
So here's some Alinksy for you:

The other important point in the choosing of a target is that it must be a personification, not something general and abstract such as a community's segregated practices or a major corporation or City Hall. It is not possible to develop the necessary hostility against, say, City Hall, which after all is a concrete, physical, inanimate structure, or against a corporation, which has no soul or identity, or a public school administration, which again is an inanimate system.

Can anyone say "MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD"?
The personification of the Muslim Brotherhood's lobe for action, CAIR, is islamophobia.

Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution. To bring on this reformation requires that the organizer work inside the system,

INSIDE THE SYSTEM

So what is the right group to join?
And morph.