Secretary of State - John F(rench) Kerry, who will presumably be lobbying Ban Ki Moon for a appt to schedule a meeting of the general assembly whenever we want to move our troops about.
Secretary of Defense - Chuck (The surge won't work, and who needs Israel, and beware the "Jewish Lobby") Hagel. Of course this would only be somewhat worse than, the indescribably horrific Gates/Gordon England we don't need F-22's and we like Hesham Islam and hate WIlliam Coughlin Defense dept of Bush. Oh and by the way, is it me or does Hagel complete the series:
Zbig, McPeak, Powers ...... thus providing a nice creme brulee to Mr. Obama's meal of serious problems of worrying dimensions of the hymietown category with americans who happen to be jewish
WHAT MUST THEY BE THINKING OVERSEAS?
Anyone else wondering what plans are in store in Tel Aviv if Obama wins this thing?
Here's a tip of the iceberg for you to think about.
Until the late 1990's Israel had a very good strategic relationship with China. China's J-10 fighter (except for the engine, it's the Lavi) and desire to buy Israel's Phalcon Airborne Early Warning System are clear evidence of that. More, the USA had to pull out ALL the stops to halt Israel from selling the Phalcon just in 2007, for fear american plots would face the Chinese over Taiwan. This China acts with an untrammeled conscience in many places. Israel until VERY RECENTLY and only with the exception of the USA has alwasy stated it would depend on no other nation, since all nations including this one did nothing directly about the Holocaust, including simply allowing in immigrants. The USA is not the only nation which might be available as a prime strategic ally despite the obvious appearance and fact that China wants Iran's oil. There is more than one way to skin a cat.
Oil will be sold no matter who is in charge in Iran.
Think outside the box
What would America's position in the Middle East suddenly be with a now indifferent Israel with a more diffuse set of relationships among other powers?
Secretary of Defense - Chuck (The surge won't work, and who needs Israel, and beware the "Jewish Lobby") Hagel. Of course this would only be somewhat worse than, the indescribably horrific Gates/Gordon England we don't need F-22's and we like Hesham Islam and hate WIlliam Coughlin Defense dept of Bush. Oh and by the way, is it me or does Hagel complete the series:
Zbig, McPeak, Powers ...... thus providing a nice creme brulee to Mr. Obama's meal of serious problems of worrying dimensions of the hymietown category with americans who happen to be jewish
WHAT MUST THEY BE THINKING OVERSEAS?
Anyone else wondering what plans are in store in Tel Aviv if Obama wins this thing?
Here's a tip of the iceberg for you to think about.
Until the late 1990's Israel had a very good strategic relationship with China. China's J-10 fighter (except for the engine, it's the Lavi) and desire to buy Israel's Phalcon Airborne Early Warning System are clear evidence of that. More, the USA had to pull out ALL the stops to halt Israel from selling the Phalcon just in 2007, for fear american plots would face the Chinese over Taiwan. This China acts with an untrammeled conscience in many places. Israel until VERY RECENTLY and only with the exception of the USA has alwasy stated it would depend on no other nation, since all nations including this one did nothing directly about the Holocaust, including simply allowing in immigrants. The USA is not the only nation which might be available as a prime strategic ally despite the obvious appearance and fact that China wants Iran's oil. There is more than one way to skin a cat.
Oil will be sold no matter who is in charge in Iran.
Think outside the box
What would America's position in the Middle East suddenly be with a now indifferent Israel with a more diffuse set of relationships among other powers?
2 comments:
From our hotel room in the Red Sea resort of Eilat (Israel) we could plainly see five American made AWACs parked at a Saudi Air base.
That explains Israel's decision to sell (the far superior)Phalcons to China.
Instead of reinforcing the "messiah" concept, it would be far more productive to continually refer to Obama as the "wolf in sheep's clothing"
Post a Comment