Thursday, January 01, 2009

The enemy within

Once upon a time, Jews the world over supported whatever Israeli government was in power pretty much without question. This was particularly true of the United States, which was and is our number one (and often exclusive) supporter in the international community.

Over the years, the hard left eroded that support to the point where many Jews in the United States - including (according to surveys) most young Jews in the United States - no longer what goes on in Israel and no longer identify with the State of Israel. The left decided to respond to this phenomenon by creating organizations that were "pro-Israel and pro-peace." To that end, organizations like J-Street were founded.

The current IDF action is the first serious military action that Israel has undertaken since J-Street was founded. And that gives the new organization and some others like it a problem. You see, they're not "pro-Israel and pro-peace," but "pro-peace and pro-Israel." If having a State of Israel whose citizens can live, work, eat and sleep in safety means that we have to fight for it, these American and Israeli moonbats aren't interested in it. So regardless of the more than 3000 rockets that have been fired on Israel's Negev over the last seven years, these people will not agree that Israel has a right of self-defense. After all, self-defense is not peaceful, and is not in keeping with the Christian rule to which they aspire of turning the other cheek.

Do you think I'm exaggerating? Have a look at this (Hat Tip: Red Tulips).
And the might of the new progressive American Jewish infrastructure that emerged in 2008 — unapologetically pro-peace and pro-Israel — is undergoing its own test as well: How to effectively argue that an Israeli war is counterproductive to Israel’s long-term security while the bombs are falling.

“Absolutely,” said Jeremy Ben-Ami, executive director of J Street, a new liberal Jewish lobby group. “This is a real testing moment for those of us who honestly believe you can be supportive of Israel but questioning of steps its government takes.”

M.J. Rosenberg, director of policy analysis for the Israel Policy Forum, another progressive Jewish organization, was similarly blunt. “It’s put-up-or-shut-up time,” he said. “For a two-state solution, for the U.S. to be an honest broker — if all of us just sit back and say, ‘Israel had no choice [to bomb Gaza], then we’re just a bunch of phonies. But I don’t see that happening.”
Let's stop right there for a minute. These people never even entertain the notion that an Israeli war might help Israel's long-term security or that Israel really has no choice but to bomb Gaza. That just can't exist in their worldview. It can't be because they can't accept it. They can't face reality as it is so they bend and twist it into something it isn't.
Usually, when Israel finds itself at war, “our side gets cowed into silence,” Ben-Ami, a former domestic policy aide to President Bill Clinton, told the Washington Independent in April. So Gaza is the first test for whether that silence can be broken, and the expected pro-bombing statements made by U.S. politicians and media commentators demonstrates its uphill struggle.
Maybe because the US politicians (even including the likes of Nancy Pelosi!) got it right and the nouveau diplomats at J-Street got it wrong?

I'd be willing to dismiss J-Street and its ilk as a bunch of irrelevant raving moonbats, except that unfortunately there are a lot of Jews out there who have replaced Judaism with liberalism, and are willing to sign on to J-Street's creed.
On Sunday afternoon, J Street emailed supporters and asked them to endorse a statement: “I support immediate and strong U.S.-led diplomatic efforts to urgently reinstate a meaningful ceasefire that ends all military operations, stops the rockets aimed at Israel and lifts the blockade of Gaza. This is in the best interests of Israel, the Palestinian people and the United States.”

The appeal was accompanied by an anguished email written by online director Isaac Luria. “At this moment of extreme crisis, J Street wants to demonstrate that, among those who care about Israel and its security, there is a constituency for sanity and moderation,” Luria wrote. “There are many who recognize elements of truth on both sides of this gaping divide and who know that closing it requires strong American engagement and leadership.”

By 5 p.m. Monday, the organization said it had collected 11,870 signatures. Ben Ami said he would present the petition to the Obama transition team, with which the organization is in talks about appointments to Middle-East policy positions.
Oy vey! That's exactly what Jewish voters in Israel feared from an Obama administration: More Dennis Ross's and Aaron Millers and Dan Kurtzers in policy positions in an administration that's not quite so sympathetic to or knowledgable about Israel in the first place. And for those of you who think "the Clintons" are going to save us because Hillary is going to be Secretary of State, Hillary has had close ties to American Friends for Peace Now since before her husband became President! The kiss to Suha Arafat didn't come out of nowhere! But 11,870 people signed up to support them in about 24 hours. That's even more readers than I had on this blog yesterday!

But it gets even worse. Instead of coordinating with the government of Israel, as Jewish lobbying groups in the US have always done, these 'Jewish' groups want to coordinate with the 'Palestinians.'

Continue reading "The enemy within"

8 comments:

midnight rider said...

Happy New Year, Carl. Here's hoping Jerusalem is finally and firmly in Israeli control in 2009. And that Israel never suffers another rocket or mortar or homicide bomber.

Stay safe good sir.

andre79 said...

I could call him a "cnut" but this will only mean I will still have a use for this guy.

midnight rider said...

This combined with the NEIN report Revere put up earlier makes you wonder just who is on who's side.

from Munich: "Pull his pants down. I want to see if he's circumsized. I think we have a double agent."

andre79 said...

I like the kiss though. Too drunk (read "very") to comment anyway. I know who they are and still think it is a hot kiss. Have a good one.

midnight rider said...

Y'know, chicks kissing. Chicks with tats. Chicks with tats kissing. Chicks with guns. Chicks with tats and guns. Chicks with tats and guns kissing. . .

Empty bottle of Cold Duck on the floor, half shot bottle of Old Granddad in front of me (half behind me). Not quite weird enough yet, but getting there. . . Grim. . .

Carl in Jerusalem said...

Midnight Rider,

Who wants to see ugly chicks kissing? Ewwww.

andre79 said...

Errrrm Carl? 2 ugly chicks getting down to each other (especially Kennedy and Clinton) are my wetdream since Madonna-Open Your Heart.

If you don't want a Fatwa issued against you then you should watch "Mulholland Drive" every Wednesday for the next 2 weeks.

Anonymous said...

Self-loathing Jews in Londonistan:

"Also at the protest was Rabbi Chaim Blayer, 22, from Stamford Hill in north-east London.

He said he was there to protest on behalf of "our Palestinian brothers" and also to protest against the state of Israel.

He told the BBC: "There should be a whole state of Palestine. My community feels very shocked at what's going on. Groups in London synagogues are all talking about this, everybody is very upset about what is going on."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7803733.stm