That's right - the concern Israel feels for the expressed opinion of EVERY SINGLE IRANIAN LEADER SINCE THE 1979 CARTER REVOLUTION that Israel is a tumor to be removed before it kills the world, joined with their achievement of nuclear weapons and the expressed opinion of one of it's MODERATE LEADERS that the Jews will die the day they get nukes is actually a canard by a lying leader to avoid giving the Palestinians, who could have had a state on May 15, 1948 or anytime from then until 1967, a new state as a gift from Israel and Obama.Mr. Netanyahu, in his first term as prime minister in the late 1990s, earned a reputation for conspicuous insincerity. It is therefore possible to interpret his fixation on Iran — he told me in a recent conversation that it is ruled by a “messianic apocalyptic cult” — as a way of avoiding the mare’s nest of problems associated with the Middle East peace process, especially the escalating pressure from the Obama administration to curb Jewish settlement on the West Bank.
The NYT then honors this incredible angle with a column undoubtedly since this kind of torturous mental gymastic exercise is compulsory if one is going to look for a way to justify the Obamanoid delusion that an agreement of peace with jews and palestinians, and a new palestine (joined by highway with Gaza to allow quickly subsuming Abbas by Iranian controlled HAMAS), will solve all middle east problems, and end muslim's HATRED for the USA.
Hey IT'S THE OTHER WAY AROUND, Keller and Sulzberger.
It is the END of the mullahs, by killing a lot of support for HAMAS, Hizballah, the nuclear program as it is, isolating Syria and making the Wahabbis quiescent for a bit which will give peace and the existence of a Palestinian state a chance.
A chance.
No wonder these guys at the TIMES are going out of business.
I wonder if they even have a CLUE how far out of it they are
3 comments:
I can not for the life of me figure out how people justify this paradigm (for that's what it is, a paradigm, an entirely other way of looking at the world) to themselves.
The truth is, they are attempting to take the easy way out, but in the long run they are only making things harder for themselves.
By the way, am I wrong? Didn't Jeffrey Goldberg used to be on our side?
If you check out his writings in Atlantic you will find he may harbor some inclinations towards reality which were overwhelmed by his Obama man crush and expressed feelings Obama is good for the Jews and Israel.
That's just bizarre to me.
Post a Comment