Wednesday, May 06, 2009

Obama NOW about to out 40 yr old secret nuke pact of US and Israel?

Wash Times:

President Obama's efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons threaten to expose and derail a 40-year-old secret U.S. agreement to shield Israel's nuclear weapons from international scrutiny, former and current U.S. and Israeli officials and nuclear specialists say.

The issue will likely come to a head when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets with Mr. Obama on May 18 in Washington. Mr. Netanyahu is expected to seek assurances from Mr. Obama that he will uphold the U.S. commitment and will not trade Israeli nuclear concessions for Iranian ones.

Assistant Secretary of State Rose Gottemoeller, speaking Tuesday at a U.N. meeting on the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), said Israel should join the treaty, which would require Israel to declare and relinquish its nuclear arsenal.

"Universal adherence to the NPT itself, including by India, Israel, Pakistan and North Korea, ... remains a fundamental objective of the United States," Ms. Gottemoeller told the meeting, according to Reuters.

...snip


Asked by The Washington Times whether the administration would press Israel to join the NPT, the official said, "We support universal adherence to the NPT.

...snip

For the past 40 years, Israel and the U.S. have kept quiet about an Israeli nuclear arsenal that is now estimated at 80 to 200 weapons. (Most estimates I have seen put that number 450-600) . Israel has promised not to test nuclear weapons while the U.S. has not pressed Israel to sign the nuclear NPT, which permits only five countries - the U.S., France, Britain, China and Russia - to have nuclear arms.

The U.S. also has opposed most regional calls for a "nuclear-free Middle East." The accord was forged at a summit between Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir and President Nixon on Sept. 25, 1969, according to recently released documents, but remains so secret that there is no explicit record of it. Mr. Cohen has referred to the deal as "don't ask, don't tell," because it commits both the U.S. and Israel never to acknowledge in public Israels nuclear arsenal.

When asked what the Obama administration's position was on the 1969 understanding, the senior White House official offered no comment.

...snip

The Obama administration is seeking talks with Iran on its nuclear program and has dropped a precondition for negotiations that Iran first suspend its uranium enrichment program.

"What the Israelis sense, rightly, is that Obama wants to do something new on Iran and this may very well involve doing something new about Israel's program," said Henry Sokolski, executive director of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, a Washington think tank.

Bruce Riedel, a former senior director for the Middle East and South Asia on the White House National Security Council, said, "If you're really serious about a deal with Iran, Israel has to come out of the closet. A policy based on fiction and double standards is bound to fail sooner or later. What's remarkable is that it's lasted so long." Mr. Riedel headed the Obama administration's review of strategy toward Afghanistan and Pakistan but does not hold a permanent administration position and has returned to private life as a scholar at the Brookings Institution.

...snip

Israel began its nuclear program shortly after the state was founded in 1948 and produced its first weapons, according to Mr. Cohen's book, on the eve of the 1967 Six-Day War. Israeli defense doctrine considers the nuclear arsenal to be a strategic deterrent against extinction. But its nuclear monopoly is increasingly jeopardized by Iranian advances and the possibility that Iran's program could trigger a nuclear arms race in the region.

Israel's arsenal has also been an open secret for decades, despite the fact that Israeli law forbids Israeli journalists from referring to the state's nuclear weapons unless they quote non-Israeli sources.

In 1986, the Israeli nuclear scientist, Mordecai Vanunu disclosed in the Sunday Times of London photographs and the first insider account of Dimona, the location of Israels primary nuclear facility. Israel responded by convicting him of treason. He was released in 2004 after spending 18 years in prison but has continued to talk about the program on occasion. The government has barred Mr. Vanunu from leaving Israel.

...snip

In 2000, Israeli journalist Aluf Benn disclosed that Mr. Clinton at Wye River promised Mr. Netanyahu that "Israels nuclear capability will be preserved." Mr. Benn described as testy an exchange of letters between the two leaders over the Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty. He said Mr. Netanyahu wrote Mr. Clinton: "We will never sign the treaty, and do not delude yourselves - no pressure will help. We will not sign the treaty because we will not commit suicide."

The Bush administration largely dropped the treaty in its first term and reopened negotiations in its second term with a proposal that did not include verification.

...snip

Mr. Obama has made nuclear disarmament a bigger priority in part to undercut Iran's and North Korea's rationale for proliferation. His administration has begun negotiations with Russia on a new treaty to reduce U.S. and Russian arsenals. He also has expressed support for the fissile material treaty.

"To cut off the building blocks needed for a bomb, the United States will seek a new treaty that verifiably ends the production of fissile materials intended for use in state nuclear weapons," he said last month in Prague. "If we are serious about stopping the spread of these weapons, then we should put an end to the dedicated production of weapons-grade materials that create them."

David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security, a Washington think tank, said such a treaty would be the first step toward limiting the Israeli nuclear program.

"The question is how much of a priority is this for the Obama administration?" he said.

John R. Bolton, a former U.N. ambassador and undersecretary of state, said Israel was right to be concerned.

"If I were the Israeli government, I would be very worried about the Obama administration's attitude on their nuclear deterrent," he said. "You can barely raise the subject of nuclear weapons in the Middle East without someone saying: 'What about Israel?' If Israel's opponents put it on the table, it is entirely possible Obama will pick it up."

However, Ms. Gottemoeller endorsed the concept of a nuclear-free Middle East in a 2005 paper that she co-authored, "Universal Compliance: A Strategy for Nuclear Security."

"Instead of defensively trying to ignore Israels nuclear status, the United States and Israel should proactively call for regional dialogue to specify the conditions necessary to achieve a zone free of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons," she wrote.

The paper recommends that Israel take steps to disarm in exchange for its neighbors getting rid of chemical and biological weapons programs as well as Iran forgoing uranium enrichment.

Can you believe these people?

4.5 million jews, 6 million Israelis, 300 million muslims right there want them dead. And we are talking about removing nuclear weapons from their arsenal. Scratch our best ally in the ME

Hey 53%, hey 87% of jews in America are you HAPPY YET?

7 comments:

heroyalwhyness said...

Imagine if this exchange took place just a few weeks ago.

Ehud Olmert said farewell and Bibi took his oath of office on April 1st.

Guess the joke is on Obama.

With Bibi, Obama doesn't stand a chance with this game.

WC said...

I really wonder how many Jews in this country really care about Israel. I know there must be some survey somewhere that gives the percentage. We take it for granted that a Jew in America will automatically support the existence of Israel but that may not be entirely true.

See this: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/mar/29/j-street-poll-israel-palestine

eileen fleming said...

Vanunu was never a scientist-but a mid level technician who provided the photos of the clandestine Dimona WMD Facility in 1985.


The NEWS on Vanunu is after 18 years in Israeli jail on 21 April 2004, he was 'freed' but denied the RIGHT to speak to non-Israelis, among other draconian restrictions.

He is facing 3 more months in jail for speaking to foreign media in 2004; who have been MIA during an historic FREEDOM of SPEECH Trial in the 'democracy' of Israel.


Hear and see Vanunu speak on video in 2005, 2006, 2008 -and more- @ VANUNU ARCHIVES:
http://www.wearewideawake.org/

midnight rider said...

I think Obuma tries any strong arming of Bibi then Bibi will flip Obuma the nuclear finger.

Anonymous said...

WC . ..as a reform Jew, I can tell you that the subject of Israel doesn't much surface in Temple causes or in casual conversation - The local reform congregations are far too busy hosting interfaith projects, gay alliance meetings and co-ordinating community social action projects (Mitzvah)for recipients who would side with the UN, the OIC and Obama in the destruction of Israel.

I no longer belong to any reform temple - dropped out when I noticed my rabbi was working with a coalition of rabbi's to elect Obama. Spit.

The local orthodox and conservative temples and JCC aren't any more obviously pro-Israel. For instance, you would think one would see a fund raiser for Magen David or a Pizza fund for Israeli soldiers. Not here. This part of NY has the most pathetic excuses for Jews I've yet come across.

BTW . . .they don't mention our American soldiers either. It's a very anti-war crowd.

But you better believe they are expecting the rare conservative NRA member to come to services prepared for anything. We have a member who attends his services donning a camo tallit and kippah. And yes, we're related.

Epaminondas said...

I tell my fellow reformed congregants I am there to ride herd on the lot and make sure they don't run over a bunch of Israeli puppies in their rush to condemn Sharon or whoever the Israeli is, to prove how fair they are.

A recitation of facts ALWAYS provokes a 'we're shocked' murmuring.

Before I opened my mouth, no one had ever even LOOKED at the HAMAS charter let alone considered its implications.

Of course they probably all go home and then ask each other how Meir Kahane got in the door.

Anonymous said...

First thought that entered my mind when I read EPA's comment was to place a full copy of the HAMAS charter on Temple & JCC bulletin boards, then hesitated as I imagined the frightened reception - thinking it would appear to be a threat. . .then caught myself thinking . . . well, duh! The threat is real - and it's unconscionable that they are not aware of it's contents.