Monday, May 18, 2009

Pakistan Is Rapidly Increasing The Size Of Their Nuclear Arsenal


Just in time for the Taliban to take them over. Very comforting.

Oh, by the way, I hope you all have a nice day.

From the New York Times:

WASHINGTON — Members of Congress have been told in confidential briefings that Pakistan is rapidly adding to its nuclear arsenal even while racked by insurgency, raising questions on Capitol Hill about whether billions of dollars in proposed military aid might be diverted to Pakistan’s nuclear program.


Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, confirmed the assessment of the expanded arsenal in a one-word answer to a question on Thursday in the midst of lengthy Senate testimony. Sitting beside Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, he was asked whether he had seen evidence of an increase in the size of the Pakistani nuclear arsenal.


“Yes,” he said quickly, adding nothing, clearly cognizant of Pakistan’s sensitivity to any discussion about the country’s nuclear strategy or security.


Inside the Obama administration, some officials say, Pakistan’s drive to spend heavily on new nuclear arms has been a source of growing concern, because the country is producing more nuclear material at a time when Washington is increasingly focused on trying to assure the security of an arsenal of 80 to 100 weapons so that they will never fall into the hands of Islamic insurgents.


The administration’s effort is complicated by the fact that Pakistan is producing an unknown amount of new bomb-grade uranium and, once a series of new reactors is completed, bomb-grade plutonium for a new generation of weapons. President Obama has called for passage of a treaty that would stop all nations from producing more fissile material — the hardest part of making a nuclear weapon — but so far has said nothing in public about Pakistan’s activities.


Bruce Riedel, the Brookings Institution scholar who served as the co-author of Mr. Obama’s review of Afghanistan-Pakistan strategy, reflected the administration’s concern in a recent interview, saying that Pakistan “has more terrorists per square mile than anyplace else on earth, and it has a nuclear weapons program that is growing faster than anyplace else on earth.”


3 comments:

Carlos Echevarria said...

Remember when we were told that if we can just bring "democracy" back to Pakistan and oust Gen Musharraf (Yes, an SOB but our SOB like FDR said of Somoza in the '30's), milk and honey would flow in the streets and the Jihadists will be mollified???!!!???

Frankly, I have don't understand Sec Gates anymore...

I know I am off the reservation here, but to believe that the surge principles which worked in Iraq can be replicated in Afghanistan/Pakistan border regions are predicted on faulty logic and are counter historical when one takes into account the histories of armies from the time of Alexander the Great, the Persian Empire, The Romans, Russian Empire, British Empire, Soviets, etc....

Pastorius said...

I don't think you're off the reservation.

Frankly, as far as I'm concerned, we have failed in Iraq. The Muslims of Iraq are making life intolerable for the Christians and they are fleeing. If we are able to establish some peace between the Muslims (as it seems we have been able to do) that is an achievement, but it is not the Freedom and Democracy we spoke of when we went in.

Is Iraq in better shape than it was under Saddam? Well, it is for the Shiites. And, probably for the Sunnis as well. But, certainly not for the Christians ( and who needs them anyway?).

But, if the Shiites weren't so ascendant in Iraq, we wouldn't believe we needed Iran's help with settling things.

The whole thing is laughable.

Anonymous said...

Is it ok to panic now? I feel like we are the condemned - just kinda chattin' amongst ourselves.

Or is this more disinformation?

Who the hell knows?

Ro