Monday, July 20, 2009

Questions About PFC Bergdahl's Abduction

Always on Watch tipped me off to this. I'm making no judgement here, only saying the story may not be all it seems. Even so, we still have an American Serviceman being held captive by some very ruthless killers.

from Michelle Malkin:

Questions about the reported abduction of Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl
By Michelle Malkin • July 20, 2009 05:02 AM

My prayers are with the family of Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl, the U.S. soldier seen on the Taliban abduction video released this weekend. The Jawa Report has the full clip.

All Americans should hope and pray for his release from jihadi custody.

There’s one question I have, though, about strange details initially reported on the case — details which have been deleted from later wire dispatches. Read:

The circumstances of Bergdahl’s capture weren’t clear.
On July 2, two U.S. officials told the AP the soldier had “just walked off” his base with three Afghans after his shift. He had no body armor or weapon and they said they had no explanation for why he left. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case.
On July 6, the Taliban claimed on their Web site that five days earlier “a drunken American soldier had come out of his garrison” and was captured by mujahadeen.
In the video, Pfc. Bergdahl said he was lagging behind a patrol when he was
captured.
Details of such incidents are routinely held very tightly by the military as it works to retrieve a missing or captured soldier without giving away any information to captors.

The question is: Which account is accurate?

The first account strongly suggests desertion, a la Wassef Ali Hassoun.The second account might provide an explanation for why Pfc. Bergdahl had no armor or weapon on him when captured.

The third account is totally at odds with the other two.

Follow-up questions:

Were the AP’s sources mistaken?

Did the AP botch the reporting?

Or is the disturbing first account the right one? Knowing, as the AP pointed out, that “[d]etails of such incidents are routinely held very tightly by the military,” wouldn’t the two U.S. officials have been extremely careful in passing on such sensitive details to the media on July 2?

And what about the “three Afghans” that Pfc. Bergdahl reportedly “just walked off” with after his shift?

Who are they?

Did they have security clearances at the base?

Did any or all of them work as translators?

Are they still missing?

Did one of them serve as the English-speaking questioner on the Taliban video?

Is anyone else puzzled by the completely conflicting stories? Will the Associated Press explain them?

What’s going on?
***
More strangeness via the Oregonian blog:

Kim Harrison Dellacorva, who moved from Idaho last fall and lives in the Pearl District of Northwest Portland…is listed on military documents as Bergdahl’s godmother. She ran the extracurricular performing arts school in Ketchum that Bergdahl attended.

A military casualty assistance officer knocked on Dellacorva’s door June 30, after Bergdahl was reporting missing from his company’s outpost in Afghanistan’s Paktika province. At the time, nobody knew where he was or what happened to him. The military declined to release his name to the public, although his disappearance was an open secret in Hailey, the Idaho town near Ketchum where Bergdahl’s parents live in a remote canyon.

But over the weekend, his Taliban captors posted a 28-minute video that shows Bergdahl answering questions and eating.

Kim, Shane and Shane’s sister, Kayla Harrison, were relieved to see that Bergdahl is alive. But they say that parts of the video they have seen don’t sound like the Bowe they know.

“The only part that sounded like Bowe was when he said, ‘It’s very unnerving to be a prisoner,’” Kayla Harrison said.

A lot of the other stuff, about relatives and having a girlfriend back home he hoped to marry, sounded completely unnatural, the Harrisons say. Bergdahl doesn’t have a serious girlfriend, they say.


***
This is an indisputable truth:

“The Taliban are using the soldier for propaganda purposes,” said Navy Lt.
Robert Carr, a spokesman for U.S. forces in Afghanistan.


Partial transcript of Bergdahl video:

“Please, please bring us home so that we can be back where we belong and not over here wasting our time and our lives and our precious life that we could be using back in our own country.”

“Please bring us home. It is America and the American people that have that
power.”

***
Update: Lt. Col. Ralph Peters had tough words about Pfc. Bergdahl’s reported desertion yesterday and has a warning for the media:


Partial transcript:

PETERS: On that video, he is collaborating with the enemy. Under
duress or not, that’s really not relevant. He’s making accusations about the
behavior of the military in Afghanistan that are unfounded, saying there are no
rules. He’s lying about how he was captured, saying he lagged behind a
patrol.

Julie, I’ll tell you, any 11 Bravo infantryman will tell you,
that’s not how it works. In a war zone, any soldier is aware of where all his
buddies are. If it’s a night patrol, you’re sure of where the guy in front of
you and behind you is. So we know this private is a liar. We’re not sure if he’s
a deserter. But the media needs to hit the pause button and NOT portray this guy
as a hero…

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

The soldier appears to be growing a beard yet his scalp remains shaved. Hmmmm.

Anonymous said...

OT: The First In A Relentless Series Of National Strikes Against The Dictator Has Been Called For Wednesday, November 4th
July 16th, 2009 Posted By Pat Dollard.

Anonymous said...

I think the benifit of doubt should be applied to this american untill it is sorted out.

in the end what ever his percieved failings are, he may yet pay for them by having his head cut off with a butcher knife. and im not inclined to criticize him.


the whole story is very bizzare.

Always On Watch said...

Soldiers do not typically "wander off."

Mental problem?

Desertion?

Something strange is going on here.

Total said...

I fell very sorry for the guy, but I'm sure the fellow soldiers in his unit view him with disdain and disgust.

cjk said...

I'm with the Lt. Col. 100%. He stated everything carefully and correctly. In my opinion anyone who thinks he was too hard is naive.

christian soldier said...

Lt. Col. Peters tells it like it is no PC!!!that's why I like him...
I did have the same type of questions as M. Malkin---because I don't trust Muslim 'helpers' (infiltrators ???) ...
I do have friends over there who do trust their interpreters and et.al...---
C-CS

Total said...

In regard to trusting the civilian public and war in general, you guys should see the new movie "The Hurt Locker". It's the best modern war movie I've seen and it's so far my favorite movie of the year. The plot follows an Army Explosive Ordinance Disposal team in 2004 Iraq with stunning realism that leaves you at the edge of your seat for a full 2 hours and 10 minutes. I don't think I have ever seen a movie that is so intense in my entire life. This is a MUST SEE!

Trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GxSDZc8etg&feature=fvst

Yahoo Movies: http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809914561/info

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hurt_Locker

Anonymous said...

ok here it is eveyone, OBVIOUSLY the taliban is making him lie and say what they want him to say. i was in paktika province the same place as this guy and we shared our small compound with the afghan army (which by the way is very corrupt, just like teh afghan police, you can never fully trsut any of those guys) after we would get done with our combat patrols or missions for the day, we would come back to our compound which we shared with afghan soldiers, and go to sleep or do whatever, we would leave our body armor in our b-huts and lock our primary weapons (m249's or m16/m-4's in our rooms, and walk freely around our comnpound with at least a 9mm handgun on us, but some soldiers wouldnt even do that. there were quite a few soldiers thta i knew of who would walk to the afghan soldiers barracks (which is still on our enclosed gaurded compound) and shoot the shit with those guys or hang out, or try to score hashish or whatever, trade things with them, etc...so bergdhal probably went to teh afghan barracks on their side of the compound( by himself) and got jumped by theres "threee afghan counterparts) aka the afghan soldiers, and the dragged him off base and handed him to the taliban, where they received a nice chunk of change for handing him over...those scumbags would kill someone for 20 bucks, so if the taliban offerd them a thousand, youd better fucking belive theyd jump an american (who is supposed to be their comrade!) they dont give a fuck, they are corrupt as hell. i can almost GAURANTTE this is what happened. come home safe buddy im praying for you.

Anonymous said...

im over here right now and i agree with what the guys said in the comment right above me. why would anybody willingly leave a generally safe area to outside in a place where he could be killed, tortured, or just plain out live shitty for the rest of his life and leave everything behind that he has at home?????