Watch video link below and see that the Islamists in Chicago, the hometown of our islamist supporting president who has no problem with Muslims proposing the taking over of America.
Remind you of something?
Pro-Nazi German American Bund rally at Madison Square Garden. New York, United States, February 20, 1939.
7 comments:
Yes, it reminds me of something. It reminds me of the 1912 Progressive party convention where the totalitarian liberal fascist all supporting role of government was proposed.
I'm telling ya, it's not 1939, it's 1914. And we are going to get the fright of our lives. . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
if we live through it
I understand the comparisons of Cutlrurist John and MR, but I'm with WC here. WWI may have been inevitable in hindsight, but it started through a random confluence of forces, and with a lit match.
There is really no doubt in anyone's mind (any reasonable person) that the forces are all lining up on the battlefield now, just as they were in the 1930's. Iran, NK, the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda, Hamas and Hizbollah have all made their destructive intentions clear, their hatred for America, for Israel, and for Jews specifically. They are arming, and are being armed by Russia and China. There is no doubt about what is happening.
And by the way, Islam's dislike for capitalism is a pose. They certainly disdain freedom, and they disdain the United States, and Isalm is compatible with a communist-like totalitarianism, but Islam is not Communist. It is NOT an organized economic philosophy. It is barely a philosophy at all.
It is, instead, an ideology of hatred, supremacism, anger, and destruction, like Nazism.
Communism is based on resentment, but that is not the same as supremacism.
Pasto -- When I say 1914 it is, in no small part, because I think when it comes it will be a paradigm shift in the way war is fought much the way the shift occured from pre-WWI combat to post 1914 combat.
I do not really disagree with the 1939 analogy and the way forces are lining up. In that respect, yes, 1939. But when it starts nothing will ever be the same again.
Maybe I don't understand the history well enough.
No, I don't think it's that. I may not be explaining what I think well enough.
In the wars leading up to WWI combat was always a very personal (not sure that is the right word) thing. Yes guns cannons explosives etc but still it was man to man. You died by the gun, the sword the knife, the cannon, the landmine.
That all changed with World War I.
Because it was the first mechanized war. You now faced a tank coming at you, not a man on a horse. You faced a mustard gas attack. Not a bayonet charge. You faced death from the skies, bombs dropped (by hand back then) from biplanes, machine gun fire from the air.
And the stalemate of trench warfare. We saw the beginnings of it with the Civil War, I suppose, but not on the scale WWI produced.
So I'm not really talking about historical cause and effect FOR the war when I reference 1914, but the way war itself was fought.
It was a whole new level of fighting. And casualties like had never really been witnessed in history.
In that vein, WWII was a modern extension of WWI. Mechanized, lots of killing, lots of dying, but essentially of the same type -- tanks, planes etc.
The difference being, of course, the use of nuclear weapons.
So in that respect I say it will be 1914, in the way war is fought.
We've already seen a start of it, civilians among us flying airplanes into buildings, blowing up embassies and hotels. Killing other civilians as a method of warfare.
Now, take that a magnify it to WWI or WWII killing levels and you may see what I mean.
WHen this war kicks off in earnest, nukes may be the LEAST of our problems.
Ok, now that makes sense.
I understand you now.
Post a Comment