Remember, I have been predicting, from the very beginning, that Barack Obama would not make it two years in the Presidency, and that he would be removed from office by his own party.
I know it sounds like a crazy prediction. But, you have to understand me to understand how I arrive at such an belief.
I think of everything in terms of how ideas effect history. That's why I studied Philosophy and Literature in College.
I do not claim to be the brightest bulb. However, I do claim that I recognize ideas for what they are; the potentiality of power, and the movement of power.
Barack Obama has set himself at odds with the American Tradition, and with everything that makes our economy, and our heart, tick here in America.
Because of that, I am convinced he will not make it.
It turns out that I may be right, even while I am wrong. He may be brought down by his personal associations.
However, his personal associations reveal his ideology. And, that is what I have been basing my crazy-assed prediction on all along.
From Reliapundit, the Astute Blogger:
COMMUNIST FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS: OBAMA'S ULTIMATE CHICAGO CONNECTION
Obama tells one story about how he first got to Chicago.
And everyone else has a different story.
I have long found that odd - and intriguing.
In 2005, Obama
, told American Libraries magazine:
‘People always mention libraries in terms of just being sources for reading material or research. But I probably would not be in Chicago were it not for the Manhattan public library, because I was looking for an organizing job and was having great trouble finding a job as a community organizer in New York.
‘The Mid-Manhattan Library had these books of lists of organizations, and the librarian helped me find these lists of organizations, and I wrote to every organization. One of them wound up being an organization in Chicago that I got a job with.’
He said the same thing at Wesleyan's Commencement in 2008.
But the man who hired him - Gerald Kellman (Marty Kaufman in Obama's memoir, and an ardent disciple of Alinsky) -
has an entirely different account - one he related at the DNC Convention in Denver:In 1985, I needed to hire a community organizer. I found myself in New York City, across from a 25-year-old recent college graduate. I wanted to convince him to give up a comfortable life and a bright future to come to Chicago to take up the toughest of challenges for a salary of just $10,000 a year.
It was not difficult to convince Barack to take the job. All I had to do was describe what had happened to people on the south side of Chicago. The region had once been the largest producer of steel in the entire world, but the mills had shut down one by one. Other industries began to close, then stores and offices. Without jobs, neighborhoods unraveled and kids became easy prey for gangs and drugs.
Two weeks later, using $2,000 we gave him to buy a car, Barack arrived in Chicago.
THIS FOLLOWING VERSION COMPORTS WITH KELLMAN'S SPEECH:
BYRON YORK:Kellman set out to find a black organizer. He ran an ad in some trade publications, and Obama responded.
But at first Kellman wasn’t sure Obama was right for the job. “My wife was Japanese-American,” Kellman recalled. “I showed her the résumé, with the background in Hawaii. The name’s Obama, so I asked, ‘Could this be Japanese?’ She said, ‘Sure, it could be.’” It was only when Kellman talked to Obama on the phone, and Obama “expressed interest in something African-American culturally,” that a relieved Kellman offered Obama the job.
- AN AD???
- IN VAGUE PUBLICATIONS?
- HAS ANYBODY SEEN A COPY OF ONE?
- AND IN THIS VERSION, KELLMAN OFFERS OBAMA THE JOB OVER THE PHONE. HMM...
- HE IS ABSOLUTELY NOT SAYING HE GOT A LETTER FROM OBAMA.
KELLMAN HAS BEEN CONSISTENT: HE PLACED ADS AND SET OUT TO GET OBAMA.
And there's another tidbit that I find VERY intriguing:
Obama has EXPLICITLY said and written that when he got to Chicago he "didn't know a soul".
LISTEN TO HIM SAY IT:
13 comments:
Allow me to argue as Obama's surrogates will surely, since he will say nothing.
"SO WHAT? This is another fringe argument by right wing nuts who cannot adjust to a president who wants real change. He is a fairly elected president and will serve out his term. Deal with it"
I advise to forget his heritage. Personally I don't care if his father was Lenin and his mother was Rosa Luxemburg and he was born as a result of an orgy in central park led by Valentina Tereshkova
There is no doubt in my mind however that ACORN is the mutated CRIMINAL organism born of Alinsky's activism (which was designed to ensure disadvantaged communities don't get screwed ..not to take over a nation). ACORN will be tough to tie to Obama in a way which can result in a any kind of Constitutional removal.
That is the only kind of removal I care to discuss today
We should focus on 2010. The methods of bringing attention to Obama's back ground was not sufficient to prevent his election. However now that people that were in his back ground are in power, americans seem to be paying MORE attention. I am not sure it is enuf, yet
We should focus on these kinds of issues. We should ask if a sudden death on the supreme court which can result in 5-4 the other way is a situation americans want to see go to people who picked Van Jones?
We should ask if the people who dropped charges against the new black panthers for brandishing weapons at a voting station are trustworthy for choosing another justice?
We should ask if those who characterize honest differences as racism ALL THE TIME can be responsible for leadership and tolerate american dissent.
We should ask if the change americans voted for was a government invading facets of their final days, when they are sick and most vulnerable and their families are not thinking clearly.
We should ask if this administration's actions as a whole have been at all realistic in foreign matters and if we are better off as a result.
WE should ask if our lives are better now than they were in Nov 2008 (and watch them try to Blame BUsh 2 years later)
We should cast aside what has not worked, and instead look for what will.
I have suspected this is true for some time now. What other reason would there be for a presidential candidate to restrict access to virtually all documentation of his past? What explains the apparent abandonment of his son by a Muslim father? If the information presented here is true, it means that a major fraud has been perpetrated against the voters in this country. At the very least the voters themselves have been remiss in not asking enough questions about the background of their candidate. Fraud, however, adds the element of deliberate misleading and manipulation that it should be confronted.
Granted, it may not be feasible to provide a rock-solid trail of evidence to support this. Or perhaps not until Obama is "safely" out of office. But it's important to know where this stunning infusion of hardcore leftist ideology came from.
BTW, Black Orpheus is an absolutely gorgeous movie.
Excellent post. I think the reason for no actual birth certificate (dont' care) is the father of Odama is Davis, and O doesn't want to destroy his cover or admit his mother was a mega-slut. Epi is right. We don't need to hang our hat on O getting stripped of his office. No one blogging on IBA has enough ammo to survive the riots when 95+% of the blacks go about burning the country because "the white man was p/o'd about the 1st black president."
SamenoKami brings some valid points however if Obama does get booted it will be with Democrat support if not led.
Also, he may go down for other reasons than this. Someone may come forward and unload some info, who knows. There's a perfect storm for a radical like him to go down.
I believe "black" folk are starting to turn against him. Star Parker makes a great point that going against the political grain in the "black" community can be dangerous.
Personally, Obama will have a meltdown that can't be spinned or hidden. No one this angry and full of hate can hold it in for long. His wife will have a hand in his demise.
Did you see that woman's face during his speech to both houses the other day? She looked like someone pissed on her birthday cake and kicked her dog.
I think the phrase "Perfect Storm" is apt.
I also think the metaphor of a rock-slide or avalanche is apt.
Obama's whole mountain of being is perched on the edge of collapse. You can not hold together this many lies, obfuscations, and evasions (of the Constitution - the American Tradition - and reality in general). It's physically (psychically) impossible.
Oh, by the way, Epa is right, this is not the stuff that will bring him down.
However, I do not agree with Epa that this ought not be focused on.
I think it is part of the "Perfect Storm".
The plausiblity of connections is breathtaking. Having just read AB's blog, I note that Mark, son of Davis responded several times in the comment section - immediately.
Triggering a "thou doest protest too much" characterization, implying a vested interest deeper than openly admitted. Is Mark in protective mode - as if protecting a sibling . . .nay, a half-sibling?
FWIW, I now finally fully distance myself from the birther movement, since Davis' paternity quelches the natural born citizen arguement while, as Samenokami stated, Davis' paternage confirms Barry's "mother was a mega-slut" and likely a mega manipulator. I suspect she did travel with Sr. to Kenya, to avoid the public humiliation (given the social limitations of tolerance during the early 60's) of giving birth to a racially mixed child stateside.
Beginning with her parent's dissappointment having birthed a female child, "Stanley Anne" may have lashed out, as any oppositionally defiant child does, testing/manipulating societal boundaries.
Stanley-Anne's manipulative behavior would have been easily recognized and not warmly received within Sr's tribal community. She & Jr. retreated post haste, sans Sr.
Considering Sr's culture would have the father normally claim custody, this confirms Sr.'s rejection of paternity.
The legacy of a manipulative mother who recognized opportunity in the culture of Islam with all it's inherent deceptions - providing her son a surname which opened many doors for him in the PC MC utopia, doors to which his natural surname & widely recognized commie connections would have been openly shuttered, hindering the meteoric ascension to power this manipulation and deception enabled.
Disgust without pity.
I think y'all are missing the main points of the possiblity of this being the real history.
1. obama lied about ayers being a friend and mentor, and if he lied about that radical connection, did he have a radical connection to the weather underground?
this exposes him as being a radical. he sold a bill of goods. he sold himself as a moderate thoughtful man and americans bought that. now he will little by little be shown as so radical and mysterious that it more and more alarm americans.
2. the birthers are being used as usefull idiots.
as long as they are spouting whacky ideas of being born in kenya, which wouldnt matter becuase his mother is an american, it is a crazyiness covering up the real more alarming radical history and upbringing he had.
and they groomed it and like it becuase it keeps people from seeing the forest through the trees.....
Rumcrook,
I agree with everything you wrote. I just don't think this will be the thing that takes him down. It's the fraying piece of the sweater:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqgN0T6f1kg
Also, I have said from the beginning, along with you, that the whole "Birther" thing was a case of Obama's people playing all the dumb-ass "extremist right-wingers" like a fiddle.
I never believed he was not a citizen (perhaps I did for a second at one point, but I don't remember it, if I did). I have always said that I thought Obama ought to release his birth certificate and other records, but that it was more useful to him to not release them, because it makes our side look like nuts.
I posted this research from Reliapundit because I believe it is the beginning of the sweater being undone by the one string.
And, as I said previously in this post, it is only part of the "Perfect Storm" which is coming together to unseat the man from the Presidency.
Pasto....
You don't agree with me 100%?
YOU'RE BANNED !
As Britney Spears, whom you so artfully quoted yesterday, might say, "Oops, you commented again."
:)
no I get that pastorius I dont think it alone will bring him down, your right it is just part of an ever fraying sweater, but it makes his judgment suspect and gives evidence to why his agenda is more radical than how he speaks, since his actions and words are so polar opposite.
and in the end no one with common sense wants a cypher making critical descisions about thier lives nor someone who as the scales drop seems more and more to be a destructive radical ( or at least a radical who traveled in circles of destructive radicals and covered it up)
I have long suspected that the reason for the Prez not wanting to reveal his documents is somethign along these lines, not that he was born outside of the US. I also suspect that he might have received aid as a foreign student. Many will say "it doesn't matter who his father was" or how he paid for his education and they are correct. However, this would clearly show that so much of what he claims is untrue and that he has a penchant for lying. It is a matter of integrity. If this would to be proven it would surly ruin his political career in that he would be trusted even less than he is today.
Post a Comment