What all the dhimmified politicians fail to see when they talk about islam "should be integrated" into our Western Societies is that muslims do not want to integrate - the quran tells them not to do so. This is the elephant in the room that ALL of those idiot politicians cannot or refuse to see.
Pat Condell in his latest piece sees the elephant and says "islam dominates, it doesn't integrate" in his usual inimitable style.
2 comments:
Ray Boyd,
He did a good job again on the issue of Islamization, but I have to correct him on a mistake. Multiculturalism has its origins in a time prior to their being large numbers of Muslims in the west, and I don't think it was created to soften us up for Islamization, but Muslims who want to subjugate westerners and destroy our culture are definitely taking advantage of it.
Gotta love Pat! But you are correct, Damien. Search results:
http://www.answers.com/topic/multicultural
Origin: 1941
During the deadliest war of the deadly twentieth century, the term multicultural emerged as an antidote to an -ism that had brought much suffering. The -ism was nationalism (1844), the insistence that one nation was superior to all others and should impose its culture on the rest of the world. The antidote was named in a book review in the New York Herald-Tribune for July 1941 applauding "a fervent sermon against nationalism, national prejudice and behavior in favor of a 'multicultural' way of life." Multiculturalism (1965) meant "respect for the ways of all nations and peoples," not just one's own.
Post a Comment