Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Huma Weiner Is A Muslim Woman, So Why Is She Married To a Jew?


In an interview with Front Page Magazine, Robert Spencer speculates as to what might be going on behind the scenes:
Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Robert Spencer, the director of Jihad Watch and the author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad.

Frontpage: Robert Spencer, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

I would like to talk to you today about Anthony Weiner’s marriage to his Muslim Brotherhood wife, Huma Abedin.

How is it exactly that a Muslim woman who is connected to the Muslim Brotherhood is married to a Jewish man? Something is not fitting here is it?

Spencer: Jamie, Islamic law prohibits a Muslim woman from marrying a non-Muslim man. A Muslim man may marry a non-Muslim woman, but not the other way around. This is yet another manifestation of Islamic supremacism: the idea is that a wife will become a member of her husband’s household, and the children will follow the religion of the father. Thus, Muslim men marrying non-Muslim women ultimately enriches the Islamic community, while the non-Muslim community must forever be made to diminish.

Consequently, when a non-Muslim man begins a relationship with an observant Muslim woman, he is usually pressured to convert to Islam, and such conversion is made a condition of the marriage. Of course, laws are often honored in the breach, and this is not always true. So while we know that Huma Abedin’s parents were devout and observant Muslims — indeed, her father was an imam — we don’t know what exactly is going on with her marriage to Anthony Weiner.

Certainly the most likely scenario is that Weiner did convert to Islam, as Abedin’s mother, a professor in Saudi Arabia, would almost certainly have insisted that he do so. Weiner has made no public statement of this conversion, but since it would almost certainly have cost him politically if he had announced it, this silence is not any indication that he didn’t actually convert.

However, it is also possible, given the recent scandal involving Weiner’s apparently frequent and sexually charged contact with other women, that the rumors that the Abedin/Weiner union is a political marriage of convenience are true. After all, in 2008, Hillary Clinton was running for president. There were widespread insinuations that she was involved in a romantic and/or sexual relationship with Abedin, her ever-present personal assistant. Those whisperings persisted into Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State. Abedin’s 2010 marriage to Weiner, at which Bill Clinton presided, put those rumors to rest.

In Islamic law, a Muslim must officiate a marriage ceremony; hence if Bill Clinton was the only one officiating, the marriage was not valid according to Islamic law. Huma Abedin would undoubtedly have known that. Thus, if no Muslim was officiating along with Clinton, Weiner would not have had to convert to Islam, as the whole thing was a charade from the outset, apparently entered into with the full awareness of all parties concerned.

FP: This all seems very strange. What do you personally think is going on?

Spencer: Either Weiner converted to Islam to marry Abedin, and a Muslim was officiating at the ceremony along with Clinton, or the marriage is a sham and Abedin, at very least, is fully aware of that — and probably the others are also. I don’t see any other possibilities.

FP: Sorry, I am a bit confused about the Bill Clinton angle. Isn’t this a bit of a bizarre person to ask to officiate your wedding? One would think that in getting married, you have things like faithfulness and loyalty on your mind, no?

Spencer: Yes, Bill Clinton is a strange choice, indeed — unless the whole point of the union had to do more with the Clinton connection than with faithfulness and loyalty.

FP: According to Islamic Law, Huma Abedin could be killed, right? If the whole thing is not a charade and a trick, it is a bit bizarre that her family, who are Muslim Brotherhood and Muslim Sisterhood operatives, have allowed this and not punished her, no?

Spencer: Yes, Jamie. If the marriage is not a sham, it is exceedingly strange that Huma Abedin’s mother and other Muslim Brotherhood connections would have no problem with it. She is, of course, a high profile individual in the United States, and thus is in a very different situation from that of a woman in Saudi Arabia who might enter into a relationship with a non-Muslim man. In Saudi Arabia, such a woman would almost certainly be murdered; would Brotherhood operatives murder the aide to the Secretary of State for committing the same sin? That is not so clear.

FP: Last year, Walid Shoebat translated the Arabic declarations relative to the validity of the Weiner-Abedin marriage. One publication Shoebat translated was the Al-Marsid newspaper, which reported on the marriage specifically:

“Dr. Anwar Shoeb of the faculty of Islamic law in Kuwait declared that the marriage between Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin is null and void, considering it adultery as confirmed in the Sharia position, prohibiting the marriage of a Muslim woman to a non-Muslim, regardless of whether he is a Jew or a Christian. In this case, he assured the invalidity of the marriage certificate between them.”

Your thoughts on this?

Spencer: Dr. Shoeb is completely correct, of course, from the standpoint of Islamic law. In light of that, it is striking that there is no record anywhere of any Islamic anger about Abedin’s marriage or Hillary Clinton’s connection with her. This lends credence to the possibility that the marriage is a sham, and is known to be a sham among those in the Islamic world who have been responsible for stirring up and manipulating popular anger about other matters, such as the cartoons of Muhammad.

FP: So, just to crystallize the matter then, there is a remote possibility that Abedin is actually being deceptive in her marriage to Weiner to follow Muslim Brotherhood instructions and to infiltrate the U.S. government, correct?

Spencer: Certainly. That is a very real possibility, and it should be investigated. But the only ones who have the means to do so are mainstream media journalists who are either clueless or complicit....
There is more.

There is one more possibility that Spencer did not consider here. That is the possibility that Huma Weiner is simply another Postmodernist non-believer, or non-specific believer, or perhaps she is just a marginal/moderate Muslim.

Certainly I never thought any different of Anthony Weiner, did you? I mean, did you think Anthony Weiner was a devout, observant Jew?

LOL

Still, I think Spencer's speculations are worthy for consideration given the fact that Huma Abedin's father is an Imam, and her mother is a respected University Professor.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Spend a few minutes looking at, and thinking about that picture of the two of them together. To me it looks like he has both his arms wrapped around his new prize like one might hug a duffel bag full of payoff cash that you're worried someone might make a grab for at any moment. She on the other hand, looks cool, calculating, and solemnly determined to play out her assigned role or mission.

What went wrong Anthony? Did you ever get to actually bed your prize, or did it turn out that Obama got the nomination and from that point on you discovered your bag contained mostly stacks of news print disguised to look like stacks of bills.

Did you cry about it over beers with Hillary when the Dior quality cooch suddenly dried up for her as well?

Idle speculation? Conspiracy foolishness? I doubt it. Nothing is too over the top in these here interesting times. And you can bet your last dollar that if a MB associate or operative gets that close to the big chair, it ain't no bloody coincidence.

"Have I told you before there is no escaping the nature of the universe? It is that nature that has again brought you to me. Where some see 'coincidence', I see 'consequence'. Where others see 'chance', I see 'cost'.
- The Merovingian

Pastorius said...

Interesting speculation, Anonymous. Some of those thoughts have crossed my mind as well.

You're a good writer, by the way.

Damien said...

Pastorius,

I have a feeling she is just a moderate Muslim. Weiner didn't convert to Islam, and as far as I know, none of her family are threatening her. Most likely she and her intimidate family are not fundamentalists, although I do suppose that some of them might really be Jihadists, but I see no evidence of that. Plus, I think that a really devote fanatical Muslim, would probably be afraid of him leading his daughter away from Islam, even if the marriage was a sham.

Pastorius said...

I agree, Damien.

Anonymous said...

Jews will screw anything with a cooch - why all the fuss just 'cause HE didn't convert? Didn't hear any whining from you racist jokers when Sacha Baron Cohen's girl converted. Oops, he's a Jew isn't that why there's no fuss? Morons.

midnight rider said...

The post is from Jihad Watch, not our own writing. And Pastoirus did state there was another possible (and very likely) explanation.

Whereas there is no explanation for you being simply an antiisemitic piece of shit.