Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Israel getting the Republican/Tea Party Treatment for defying Obama

The crime is not being against a ‘deal’, the crime is being against Obama, WHO KNOWS WHAT IS BEST FOR YOU, you silly Israelis. Who YOU voted, for, and what you voted you want? Well, we have a certain person who knows better than you in your short sighted millions and history.
Every prediction made by Americans who happen to be Jewish and saw Obama for what he IS, is coming to pass. As for the rest of the Americans who happen to be Jewish and HAVE TO BE PROGRESSIVE FIRST BEFORE ALL ELSE, this is what you asked for.
This man’s Ambassador to the UN, Samatha Power, Mrs. Cass Sunnstein, called for the investment of Israel by US Troops to protect Palestine.
As you read this think of how close we are to the moment when Americans who are Jewish AND support Israel’s existence are accused of dual loyalties, or worse, in code and overtly.
Barack Obama, who has divided us along lines I long thought erased.
ERASED FOREVER.
But HE needs them. He needs those lines.
WHAT DID YOU EXPECT, EXCEPT FOR THIS?
Politico:
One way to measure just how tense U.S.-Israeli relations have become: Look at how prominent proxies for both sides are duking it out in public.
By that standard, the friendship is cratering, with supporters and opponents of a White House-backed nuclear deal with Iran rhetorically at one another’s throats.
A well-regarded Obama foreign policy surrogate with close White House ties, Colin Kahl, and the best-known media voice for pro-Israel forces in Washington, Josh Block, got into a nasty Twitter tangle over the weekend that laid bare how caustic the Iran debate has become between the two staunch allies.
“As usual, U don’t know what UR talking about & R advocating max alt[ernative] that’ll lead 2 war,” wrote Kahl, a top Pentagon official during Obama’s first term and the co-chairman of the president’s foreign policy board during his 2012 reelection campaign.

“There you go again - typical vile smear,” replied Block, a former spokesman for the influential American Israel Public Affairs Committee. “Hateful notion fm WH that supporters of talks 4 better terms R ‘warmongers’ & urge media,allies 2 smear critics as not acting 4 US interests.”
“Thanks Mr. Pot. Sincerely, Mr. Kettle,” Kahl countered later.
The bitter showdown occurred just outside the veil of officialdom, where diplomatic conventions and the desire to keep intact the broad bipartisan coalition supportive of Israel dictate that formal spokespeople for the White House, the Israeli government and the largest pro-Israel groups carefully measure their on-the-record comments.

The cause for the current fight: the Obama administration’s drive to strike an interim deal intended to halt and/or roll back Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for a limited easing of sanctions on Tehran. Despite intense Israeli objections, such a pact was almost agreed to at international talks with the Iranians a couple of weeks ago — negotiations that are set to resume on Wednesday in Geneva.
The new conflict comes in the wake of a series of pointed disagreements between President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in recent years over issues like the Israeli-Palestinian peace process and the U.S. response to the Arab Spring movement.
“It’s the worst I’ve ever seen,” said Leslie Gelb, president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations. “The government officials on both sides aren’t going to say they’re enraged, but they are, and their supporters will tell you that. People on the fringes in Israel are saying it, supporters here are certainly saying it and Obama supporters are saying it, but not with a swipe at Israel.”
“Both sides are fighting viciously here,” said the Brookings Institution’s Ken Pollack, a National Security Council staffer under President Bill Clinton. “That same polarization that we’ve seen with health care, immigration and gun control, we’re seeing it now with Iran.”

No comments: