'cookieChoices = {};'

The Right of the People to be Secure in their Persons, Houses, Papers, and Effects,
Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures,
Shall Not Be Violated


Saturday, June 15, 2013

Pamphlet to Hand Out at Protests and Elsewhere

The protest in Manchester
The following is a pamphlet someone (who wishes to remain anonymous) wrote for the protest in Manchester, Tennessee. It is meant to be printed on both sides and folded in half. You have the author's permission to use it in any way you want.

Basics of Islam pamphlet (PDF document)

Hand it out at your next ACT! for America or Q Society or English Defense League meeting. Hand it out at protests. Hand it out to your friends and family, at your synagogue, temple or church.

For more leaflets, check this out. Also see these informative flyers by Civilus Defendus. And this brochure by Islam Monitor.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Citizen Warrior at permanent link# 1 Comments

Nana (The Dreaming)

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Quiet (Chill from Sheila Chandra)

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Ever So Lonely

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

It's Alright Ma (I'm Only Bleeding)

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Muslim Moderates Terrorize France

Argenteuil France: Moderate Muslims Attending Anti-Islamophobia Rally Attack Police & Beseige Town Hall


"At a rally against Islamophobia linked to an attack on a veiled woman on May 20, young protesters have taken this afternoon, violently, to the Commissioner of Argenteuil, as well as a other responsible local police.
Thirty young people surrounded the two police officers and have dealt their punches and kicks. The police had to be exfiltrated in the town hall. 
Earlier, the deputy mayor of Argenteuil, Philippe Doucet, had come to explain to a crowd of a thousand people. Heckled and booed, he had escorted back to the mayor. 
By late afternoon, the lawn of the Town Hall was still occupied by protesters. " 


Clearly, France needs more Moderate Policing. 
A "full covered" niqab woman was stopped for identity purposes by cops in Argenteuil (France), when suddenly a mob of Muslims assaulted the cops. The situation went quickly out of control (cops had to leave the scene and come back with special units). Muslims mobbed the area after postings on Twitter, Facebook and other social media, urged all muslim people in the area of Argenteuil to come and protest against police.
The burka has been banned.
Argenteuil: affrontements avec la police après le contrôle d'une femme en niqab
Des heurts ont éclaté lors la femme, en voile intégral, a été contrôlée par la police.
Argenteuil: affrontements avec la police après le contrôle d'une femme en niqab Par LEXPRESS.fr, publié le 12/06/2013 à 14:41, mis à jour à  L'Express.fr (thanks to Golem)
Alors que les policiers procédaient au contrôle d'identité de cette femme en niqab, un attroupement s'est formé et a dégénéré en affrontement avec les policiers.
Google translate:
Argenteuil clashes with police after the control of a woman niqabBy LEXPRESS.fr, published on 6/12/2013While the police proceeded to the identity of the woman in niqab control a crowd formed and degenerated into clashes with police.
Argenteuil clashes with police after the control of a woman niqabClashes erupted when the woman, in full sail, was controlled by the police.REUTERS / Pascal RossignolAn identity that goes wrong control. Clashed Tuesday night police and bystanders in Argenteuil, Val-d'Oise, after control of a woman wearing the full veil, said on Wednesday a source familiar with the matter. While the police proceeded to the identity of this woman control a crowd formed and degenerated into clashes with police, the source said.300 women verbalized in a yearThe law of 11 October 2010 prohibits hide her face in the public space. Violation of this prohibition is punishable by a maximum fine of 150 euros. One year after the entry into force of this Act, April 11, 2011, about 300 women had been fined.On May 20, a young woman wearing the hijab (veil covering the hair but revealing the face) was attacked on her way home in Argenteuil. President of the National Observatory against Islamophobia, Abdallah Zekri announced its desire to become a civil party in the case.WithWarning moderation.The content of this article may give rise to unacceptable comments on our site. All messages will be moderated racist, and the author be liable to banishment. For the good performance of the debate, thank you to discuss in courtesy and respect for others. If you think a comment violate the charter, thank you for the report rather than respond and escalate the conversation.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 3 Comments

Obama IRS Targeted, Infiltrated and Harassed Christian Churches

Speaking on condition of anonymity, sources have told The Examiner that the Obama administration has allegedly engaged in a top secret, highly classified program of infiltratingChristian churches in order to snoop on their activities.

Among the targets were Billy Graham's organization, Samaritan's Purse, and an 180 year old Baptist paper.

The Obama IRS implemented a program to infiltrate and target conservative, evangelical Christian churches.

The Examiner reported:
On Thursday the Examiner provided an exclusive report indicating that the Obama administration had implemented a covert program beginning in 2009 that was intended to spy on conservative, evangelical Christian churches. 
That program involved infiltration — sending in government operatives to join churches for the purpose of data collection. The government snoops would keep their eyes and ears open for criticism of the Obama administration, talk of Tea Party participation, conversations about gun ownership, and a number of other issues. 
But a special report issued today by Fox News indicates that the program went far beyond infiltration and snooping. The IRS was used to harass Christian churches if they were identified as places where large numbers of anti-Obama citizens congregated for worship. 
The Obama administration, according to the report, considered any public criticism of administration policies to be political in nature and should therefore impact whether or not these congregations were allowed to gain or keep their tax exempt status. 
But pastors have long maintained that there are a myriad of areas where political and moral/spiritual issues overlap, and thus, the pastors feel obligated as the guardians of spiritual truth to speak out concerning these issues. 
Abortion, for example, is both a political and a spiritual issue. Most conservative, evangelical Christians believe that Biblical principles are abundantly clear concerning the sanctity of human life. And many pastors thus feel constrained by their calling to condemn abortion as a hideous and barbaric assault on the sacredness of human life.

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Infidels Criticize Islam, Muslims Respond With The Eloquence We Have Come To Expect

Tommy Robinson appeared on a BBC show a week or two back. This young gentleman took exception to some of the points Tommy Robinson made.

A young lady commented on Facebook that she doesn't trust most Muslims because she was once attacked by people of the Islamic faith. At the same time, she asserts she does not dislike Muslims because of race. She was apparently, attempting to make the classic distinction between the general behavior of those who ascribe to a particular ideology, and their racial makeup. Ok, fair enough.

This gentleman believes he has another way of looking at things which bears on the legitimacy of such distinctions.

Vlad Tepes comments:
I should like to add, that if US soldiers gang raped someone it would be a crime as it would not be sanctioned or ordered as part of any US policy or military policy and both civilian and military courts would send soldiers or other Western officials away to jail for a long time for such activities. 
WHen muslims gang rape girls in the UK there is not one mosque or muslim organization that condemns it outright and in fact it is sanctioned both institutionally and scripturally. So it is not a crime but in fact is policy. And herein lies the crucial difference.

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 4 Comments

About Inspectors General

(with a hat tip to Asylum Watch)

About Inspectors General:
...Established by the Inspector General Act of 1978, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) examines all actions of a government agency or military organization. Conducting audits and investigations, either independently or in response to reports of wrongdoing, the OIG ensures that the agency’s operations are in compliance with the law and general established policies of the government. Audits conducted by the OIG are intended to ensure the effectiveness of security procedures, or to discover the possibility of misconduct, waste, fraud, theft, or certain types of criminal activity by individuals or groups related to the agency’s operation. Misuse of agency funds or equipment are often revealed by OIG audits....
Obama's approach to inspectors general:
...Over the past few years Barack Obama has attempted to starve the beast by refusing to fill vacancies in the ranks of Inspectors General as they have arisen. The White House been routinely chided for years over its negligence. Timothy Smith of the Washington Post reported in May of 2011 that "there were 10 IG vacancies, including five at cabinet-level agencies. Four of them had been vacant for more than 3 years."...
America's system of government has many checks and balances. Obama is deliberately thwarting our system of checks and balances and, at the same time, declaring that Americans need not worry about tyranny.

Wake up, America! This is what you've got sitting in the Oval Office:

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch at permanent link# 0 Comments

'Man Of Steel' Review

He wouldn’t WHINE about being a lonely alien who was bound to be misunderstood, although the BEST parts of the movie are before you realize he is a whiner.
Music is among Hans Zimmer’s best efforts.
The other Zod  (Terence Stamp) was better, which bothers me because I think Shannon is GREAT.
Stamp’s Zod is sadly authoritative, malevolent and only later CRAZEEEE
Shannon’s Zod is completely whacked out from the beginning
And you REALLY MISS ‘Son of Jor-EL come and kneel before Zod’.
After the first two fistfights and destruction of Kansas during the second round, FIGHTS GOT BORING, loud and pointless. In fact during the battle with the metal tentacle thing in the Indian Ocean no one could figure out what was happening and why. This never happened during any of Michael Bay’s assault on all senses.
Too bad. 
Cavill is good. Amy Adams is still a princess. Is that bad? I don’t know. However she gives Kal-El a kiss which clearly leaves him in need of a room and a DO NOT DISTURB sign. Fishburne is underutilized, and Perry White in this story is wasted.
A little lighter shade on the suit, please.

The sequel should feature a VERY HOT relationship between the clearly attracted to each other Faora-Ul and Colonel Nathan Hardy.
Above is pretty fair representation of their first date. We all know how those kinds of dates turn out.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Epaminondas at permanent link# 0 Comments

Republican Party does same things expects new results

Consider what the House GOP is up to right now. House Republicans recently passed an immigration amendment, pushed by anti-reform diehard Steve King, that would effectively mandate the deportation of the “DREAMers” who were taken to the U.S. as children. House Republicans are planning a vote next week on a measure that would ban abortions after 20 weeks, after defeating amendments that would exempt cases of rape or incest. And yesterday, House Republicans approved a version of the 2012 National Defense Reauthorization Act that contains what The Advocate calls “three controversial, antigay amendments, one of which is aimed at delaying repeal implementation of don’t ask, don’t tell.”

Why did we win WW2 and become the greatest nation in history? Who were those people fighting? Might they have been the children of those arriving from 1890-1924? And why did those people come here?
Who filled out the ranks of the Union army as FODDER at Fredicksburg? At Chancellorsville? At Antietam? When things SUCKED. And why did those people come here?
Who were Neils Bohr, Albert Einstein, Edward Teller, Hans Bethe, Enrico Fermi, John Von Neumann, Leo Szilard, Eugene Wigner, Joseph Pulitzer, Andrew Carnegie, Nicola Tesla, oh and try Bobe Hope and Levi Strauss for fun? And why did those people come here?
Get real, we can’t even figure out how to deport ARRESTED CRIMINALS who also happen to turn out to be here illegally NOW. Certainly at not less than a million dollars per case. If we bother.
REEEEEEEEDIKULOUS! It's EASY to stake out a truly classically liberal case here .. BORDER SECURITY#1, immigration back to PRE-1924 (wide open), NO PUBLIC AID OF ANY KIND for 5-7 years for immigrants (or until citizenship). If you were BROUGHT here as a minor, you can get a VERY fast track. A real, and TOUGH national E-verify in which EMPLOYERS GO TO JAIL. 
Rape? I don’t have a HUGE problem with 20 weeks (that’s getting to the point of the youngest fetus actually saved into life, although an arbitrary number is IMHO, STOOOOPID) , but to force a women to have a child in cases of rape or incest? Sorry dudes, YOU ARE INSANE.
Repeal 'don’t ask don’t tell'? How about if we just have NO POLICY about it? We just DON’T GIVE A SHIT?
Meanwhile half the republican party in congress want to kick the shit out of Assad (probably because of Iran and Hizballah and throw Russia in for good measure) in favor of Al Qaeda (Nusra) and half want us to ignore everything. I mean WTF? Half think the NSA actions are needed and half think they are wiping their asses with the Bill of Rights? [Here's a clue -they are.]
And here is the good news… the executive branch is WORSE. But that’s not a Republican problem…. YET. Maybe it will NEVER BE.
Marco Rubio himself can’t make up his mind about his own bill.
Lindsay Graham believes in freedom but want to troll my calls and search results, and then he thinks HE IS MY PARTY?
We are in a period of loosely organized (by HUGE, STUMBLING AND MYOPIC TBTF corporations and institutions) nearly purposeless non benevolent ANARCHIC decay, in which I see a likeness to a cube of sugar in the bottom of a cup of tea. You can see it’s shape, but ….one vibration and …
Eric Cantor, WAKE THE FUCK UP. Someone over there had better have a cup of coffee.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Epaminondas at permanent link# 4 Comments

How Do You Get Someone to Take a Look?

I remember listening to a recording of a humorous speaker using the analogy of a guy who slowly loses his hair until he has only one hair left on his head. He shampoos that hair and combs it lovingly every day. But one morning when he wakes up, he looks down at his pillow and sees what was his last remaining hair sitting there on the pillow. And he cries out, "My God! I'm bald!"

When I look at all the information pouring in from Turkey to Bangladesh, from Britain to Australia, about the relentless encroachment of orthodox Islam, it seems that anyone should be able to easily see that Islam is a dangerous ideology and something should be done about it.

People who don't see this seem like the guy with one hair left, unwilling yet to recognize that he is going bald.

But then I realize that all this "information pouring in" is not being seen by those who are still unacquainted with Islam. If the only thing you read was the Huffington Post and the New York TimesTime Magazine and Newsweek, and all you watched was CNN and MSNBC, you would feel that you had a very good grasp of what's going on in the world, and yet you would have a very different view than readers of Jihad Watch or Citizen Warrior. From that point of view, anyone who thinks Islam is the problem would appear much like the sexist, racist bigots of yesteryear, so you wouldn't listen to them, further cutting you off from your last remaining available source of the information that could potentially pour in.

How do we open this closed door? If you try forcing the door open, the person could respond by reinforcing the door.

It's possible the door cannot be opened from outside. Maybe it has to be opened from within.

What would motivate a person unacquainted with Islam to open the door to the hideous, frightening, enraging information waiting to pour in and forever shatter his innocenceThat is the question we should all be pondering. That is what should be keeping us up at night.

I want to hear it. What can you say or do that will motivate an unacquainted person (a person who thinks Islam is a religion of peace) to open his door and look on the other side? Because we don't really have to convince people. Once someone sincerely tries to find out whether or not Islamic doctrines are peaceful, they will discover the disturbing nature of Islam.

We've heard from many people over the years telling us that they were tired of hearing a particular person in their lives speak "badly" about Islam, so they started reading up on it so they could prove the person wrong. But of course, they discovered the terrifying truth.

This makes our task easier, in a way. We don't have to convince people that we know what we're talking about. We only need to make them curious enough to look into it. The facts speak for themselves.

So again I'm asking you — how can this be done? What have you tried before that worked? What do you think might work? Leave your answer in the comments below or email it to me and I'll post it for you (anonymously unless you tell me to post your name), and later I'll compile these answers into a post that future newbies can use as a resource — because once they become acquainted with Islam, the first thing most people want to do is share their mind-blowing new understanding with their friends and family, most of whom will think they've lost their minds. They will need help. Let's give it to them.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Citizen Warrior at permanent link# 5 Comments


Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 3 Comments

Blind Willie Johnson

Nobody on Earth Can Take a Mother's Place
Motherless Children Have a Hard Time
Fatherless Children Have a Hard Time

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 1 Comments

Tangled Up In Blue

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 6 Comments

Tried So Hard

The Flying Burrito Brothers

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

"It all started with a third-rate break-in into a reporter's computer..."

From Ace of Spades:
Is it too early to speculate about the Sharyl Attkisson hack? You're darned right it isn't. 
When she first tweeted this, I thought (and maybe wrote) "Aw, gee, all she's done is set herself up to be discredited. If she's right, she's merely informed us slightly early about it, and if she's wrong, her enemies get to label her a paranoid." 
Well, I guess we're over that hump.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Friday, June 14, 2013

I Thought This Was Appropriate For Today

Bookmark and Share
posted by Nicoenarg at permanent link# 4 Comments

Is The Obama Administration Using Intimidation To Prevent Inspectors General (Including IG Investigating IRS) From Doing Their Jobs?

Among all the unanswered questions about the IRS’s illegal targeting of conservative organizations, one is most crucial: Who ordered this extreme scrutiny? 
Amazingly, IRS inspector general J. Russell George, responsible for the investigation asking those questions about the IRS, has testified that he did not obtain that information.
Details of that testimony are interesting. Representative Tom Graves (R., Ga.) asked, “Have you asked the individuals who ordered them to use this extra scrutiny to punish, or penalize, or postpone, or deny?” George turns around to confer with his assistant. Just the fact that the inspector general had to confer to know the answer to this crucial question is amazing. George’s assistant says something to him that is not recorded, but one can see the assistant shaking his head back and forth. Then George responds publicly to the question, saying, “During our audit, Congressman, we did pose that question and no one would acknowledge who, if anyone, provided that direction.” 
Anyone who knows anything about the rights and responsibilities of an inspector general has to be shaking his head in disbelief at George’s explanation. First, every employee of the government has the responsibility to cooperate with and provide information to an IG concerning his work. 
Second, George was particularly careful to limit his answer to the “audit phase.” Every IG has two procedures to obtain information. One is audit procedure, to which IG George referred. That’s generally limited to accounting analysis, to determine whether there may be reason to open an investigation. Once there is reason — and there clearly was reason here, given the obviously illegal conduct — the IG opens an investigation, in which investigators, not auditors, pose the questions, the department employees are placed under oath, and, as a federal court has approved, informed that “failure to answer completely and truthfully may result in disciplinary action, including dismissal.” The question is why George’s office didn’t do this immediately. 
From my personal experience as an IG of another agency, I suspect the answer. I do not blame IG George personally, as he is a career civil servant who depends on a steady salary and, thereafter, a pension. 
But I learned, through being fired by the Obama administration, that performing one’s responsibilities as one should, and potentially adversely affecting the administration’s image, is not the way to keep one’s job. (Fortunately, I was not dependent on my federal IG salary.)
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 2 Comments

Jihawg Ammo: Pork-Infused Bullets Fer Killin' Muzzlems

Don't try this at home. The people are professionals.
(AmmoLand) —  You’ve probably already heard about the bizarre, Islamist slaughter of an off-duty British soldier in broad daylight on a busy street in London in May 2013.
The two assailants struck the victim with a car then jumped out and began hacking and slashing him with knives and a meat cleaver. The murderers then strutted around the victim’s body for 15 to 20 minutes until armed police arrived, upon which the self-proclaimed jihadists launched an assault on the police and were shot. 
Most strange is the way that the attackers waited around after the slaughter, strutting and bragging, but not particularly threatening or attempting to harm any of the onlookers, until armed police units finally arrived, at which point the murderers commenced what could only be characterized as a suicide attack – having brought knives to a gunfight.
Many have asked why the attackers just waited around for the armed police. Why didn’t they flee or continues attacking others, as one might expect from a couple of crazed murderers? What were they waiting for? 
The answer to that question is very significant. These men were waiting for their tickets to Paradise – and 72 virgins. They engaged in their act of jihad, killing an “infidel aggressor, enemy of Islam,” and then waited around for the armed police to show up so they could die in battle for Allah’s glory, martyrs, and therefore elected for special rewards in Paradise.  [...] 
A company in northern Idaho has come up with a culturally sensitive solution. Jihawg Ammo has developed a proprietary system for infusing ballistic paint with pork. The special pork-infused paint is then applied to the bullets of loaded ammunition. The inclusion of pork in the paint makes the bullets haraam, or unclean. Under Islamic law, anyone who comes in contact with any haraam item is then unclean, and must engage in a cleansing ritual. No unclean person can be admitted into Paradise. Do not pass Go. Do not collect 72 virgins. 
The objective of Jihawg Ammo is not to insult Muslims, nor even to send a terrorist to Hell. The objective is to serve as a deterrent – to place the promise of instant passage to Paradise into doubt in the minds of would-be jihadists. Without the promise of Paradise, how many Muslim literalists would be willing to lay their lives – and eternal souls – on the line in order to engage in acts of terrorism?

Only kill the ones tryin' to kill you, ya' hear? That's the way it works.

If you try to workin' it anuther way, we's gon' disown ya'. Cuz we don' tol' ya not to do that.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 6 Comments

Guy Clark
Randall Knife

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by midnight rider at permanent link# 0 Comments

Santa Monica School Shooter, John Zawahri Was a Christian From Lebanon (not a Muslim) - Was Not Legally Allowed to Own a Gun

The Christian-Lebanese guy John Zawahri (who most everyone on the counter-jihad blogosphere thought was Muslim) was legally not allowed nor able to buy guns. In fact he applied to obtain guns but was denied because he was crazy.

In 2006, he threatened to kill students at his High School.
Since he could not buy weapons, he built his own rifle with parts he could legally buy. And turned an antique pistol into a modern, functional one.

The media claimed that the rifle he used was AR15 but they and the police at the time lied without evidence since AR15 seems to be the new enemy of liberals.

Anyway, here's an article:

From the New York Daily News:
(Santa Monica Police Chief) Seabrooks said investigators believe mental illness played a role in the killings, but she didn’t give details. “We know his was a troubled life and that he experienced mental health challenges,” Seabrooks said. 
“We believe that his mental health challenges likely played a role in his decisions to shoot and kill both his father and his brother, to set fire to the family home, and to go on a 13-minute shooting spree spanning roughly 1.5 miles and which left five innocent people dead and three people injured.” 
Zawahri apparently built his own .223-caliber assault rifle, using it to shoot his father and brother before he set fire to their family home, officials said earlier Thursday.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

3 Year Old Boy Comments on Burqa-Clad Bitch: "Mommy, Mommy, What's That? A Ghost?"

Out of the mouths of babes.

Women who wear Portable Concentration Camps in public are backed up by Jihadists maniacs at home.

They are dangerous.

Every time you see a Burqa-clad bitch, you can be sure that the Jihad is encroaching and Sharia law is not far behind.

From Jawa Report:
Wrestling free from my grip, he tore over to her, arms outstretched, fingers pointing and yelling at the top of his voice: "Mummy! Mummy! What's that? What's THAT?"  
I smiled apologetically in the direction of the woman's face (her eyes not being visible behind the fine mesh of her veil) and tried to drag the kid away. 
Of course this only made him more determined. To my utter mortification, he started tugging on her burqa — even trying to crawl underneath it while giggling: "It's a ghost! I want to play too, mummy. Help me get under the sheet!"
Jawa has a little challenge for you concerning the Burqa-clad Jihadist bitch. 
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 2 Comments

Is the ANYTHING the LEAST BIT surprising about this: U.S. Agencies Said to Swap Data With Thousands of Firms

Thousands of technology, finance and manufacturing companies are working closely with U.S. national security agencies, providing sensitive information and in return receiving benefits that include access to classified intelligence, four people familiar with the process said.
These programs, whose participants are known as trusted partners, extend far beyond what was revealed by Edward Snowden, a computer technician who did work for the National Security Agency. The role of private companies has come under intense scrutiny since his disclosure this month that the NSA is collecting millions of U.S. residents’ telephone records and the computer communications of foreigners from Google Inc (GOOG). and other Internet companies under court order.
Many of these same Internet and telecommunications companies voluntarily provide U.S. intelligence organizations with additional data, such as equipment specifications, that don’t involve private communications of their customers, the four people said.
If we do nothing, it’s ALL OVER. And not just in the USA.
We all need new PERSONAS
Bookmark and Share
posted by Epaminondas at permanent link# 0 Comments

Islamic Supremacist Nominated as UC Student Regent

With thanks to Will at THE OTHER NEWS:

UC Berkeley senior who is a venomous supporter of the jihad against Israel and member of several Islamic supremacist groups with links to jihad terror has been nominated to become the University of California student regent for the 2014-15 academic year.
The student regent participates in a board that sets policies for the entire University of California system, which consists of ten campuses throughout the state. Sadia Saifuddin is expected to be confirmed as student regent by the full Board of Regents next month.
The hijabbed Saifuddin would be the first Muslim student regent. “My faith,” she explained, “is a big part of my life. What I love the most about Islam is that it preaches tolerance and love, which is the reason that I have close friends and networks outside of the Muslim community as well.”

Yet Saifuddin’s record at UC-Berkeley is hardly one of tolerance and love. She co-sponsored a BDS resolution in the Berkeley student Senate, calling on the entire University of California system to divest companies that do business with Israel, based on the spurious premise that Israel is “occupying” Palestinian territory.
     About SJP                              UC Berkeley Muslim Student Association
Saifuddin, a member of both Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and the Muslim Students Association (MSA), also spearheaded “A Resolution Condemning Islamophobic Hate Speech at the University of California,” which the student Senate passed unanimously. Saifuddin herself wrote the resolution, which claimed that “since September 11, 2001, Islamophobia has become the latest ‘hazing’ technique across the United States and has created a chilling effect for Muslims, Arabs, and South Asians in their communities, work-environments, and campuses,” and that “according to a Gallup Study, 60% of of [sic] Muslim Americans say that Muslims face prejudice from Americans.”
In fact, the very concept of “Islamophobia”  is a blunt instrument in the hands of Islamic supremacists, designed to intimidate non-Muslims into thinking that resisting jihad terror is “hateful.” And reality does not back up its existence: the British journalist Brendan O’Neill gave the truth behind such claims in theTelegraph last April, in the wake of the Boston Marathon jihad bombings:
In the years since 9/11, the American public has been admirably tolerant towards Muslim communities. According to federal crime stats collected by the FBI, in 2009 there were 107 anti-Muslim hate crimes; in a country of 300 million people that is a very low number. In 2010, a year of great terrorism panic following the attempt by Pakistani-American Faisal Shahzad to detonate a car bomb in Times Square in NYC, there were 160 anti-Muslim hate crimes. In 2011, there were 157. To see how imaginary the Islamophobic mob is, consider a state like Texas, fashionably mocked as a backward Hicksville full of Fox News-watching morons: there are 420,000 Muslims in Texas, yet in 2011 there were only six anti-Muslim hate crimes there. It simply isn’t true that mad racist Yanks are biting at the bit to attack Muslims.
No actual hate crimes are ever justified. In light of her hysterical exaggeration of the supposed “climate of hate” against Muslims in America since 9/11, however, clearly Saifuddin is joining Islamic supremacist advocacy groups such as the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in using hate crimes to deflect attention from the reality of jihad activity and bully Americans into thinking that it is wrong and bigoted to oppose jihad terror and Islamic supremacism. Hamas-linked CAIR and other Muslims have not hesitated to fabricate “hate crimes.” CAIR and other groups like it want and need hate crimes against Muslims, because they can use them for political points and as weapons to intimidate people into remaining silent about the jihad threat.
Saifuddin’s resolution makes clear its objective to stymie counter-terror efforts when it complains that “Muslim students have been targeted for surveillance by the FBI in Orange County, who said that they are paying particular attention to Muslim students at UC Irvine and UCLA,” and that “this surveillance is occurring on the East Coast as well, with the New York Police Department surveillance of Muslim students at Yale, Columbia, Syracuse, Rutgers, New York University, and Brooklyn College.” It asserts that “these racist and selective surveillance procedures are justified by figures in mainstream media, such as David Horowitz, who defines the core mission of the MSA to ‘advance the Islamic Jihad against the Jews and Christians of the Middle East, and ultimately against the United States.’’
Logo of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
Logo of the David Horowitz Freedom Center. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Saifuddin offers no evidence to counter Horowitz’s assertion or explain why surveillance of MSA members, who are Muslims of all races, is “racist.” In reality, Horowitz is correct. 
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 3 Comments

Older Posts Newer Posts