The Guardian’s April 14th, 2014 article, “NarendraModi: Britain can't simply shrug off this Hindu extremist: The UK will alsosuffer if India elects this far-right activist. We must sever our links withhim,” is a hit piece. Narenda
Modi is a Hindu Nationalist. But
that does not make him evil. We who
defend the West should pray for his victory in India’s upcoming Prime Minister
election.
Narendra Modi is pro-Hindu and he understands the
dangers of Islam. Does that make
him a racist? Hitler? No. It makes him a rational culturist. If elected he will not put Muslims in gas
chambers. He will, however, guard
India’s borders against relentless Islamic immigration designed to re-subjugate
India to Islam. He will enact
policies that affirm India’s Hindu identity.
India is run by the multicultural party “Congress.”
As part of their multiculturalism, they create special electoral and employment
set-asides for minorities (mostly Muslims). They fund mosques, but not Hindu temples. And, whenever you mention that Islam is
dangerous, they call you “racist” and “communal,” (note that Muslims are not
racist or communal if they promote their culture - sound familiar?). Congress’ relentless multiculturalist
policies created the need for Mod’s culturist BJP party.
The Guardian’s hit piece blames Modi for the 2002
Gujarat “pogroms” (actually riots).
Gujarat is a state in India.
These riots started when Muslims chased Hindu Nationalists onto a train
and set it on fire killing 58 people.
In the ensuing riots, 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus were killed
(wikipedia). Modi was the
Chief Minister of Gujarat at the time and set a curfew the day after the train
conflagration. An official inquest
cleared Modi of charges that he aided in the violence.
READ THE REST HERE:
No comments:
Post a Comment