Thursday, May 08, 2014

Why Did the Press & Political Establishment (But I Repeat Myself) Only Begin Caring about Boko Haram When They Began Kidnapping Girls?


This focus on Boko Haram from both the media and the government is an unqualified good. The press arguably increased the pressure on global governments to do something about this backwards group of terrorists. But Boko Haram is not a new phenomenon. It was not long ago that some – including this author – were asking why this group’s atrocities were not generating any attention in the press. 
On February 25, between 40 and 59 children were killed by the fundamentalist militant group. Early that morning, Boko Haram terrorists attacked a boarding school and shot many of children, aged 11 to 18, while they slept. Some of the students were gunned down as they attempted to flee. Others had their throats slit. In some buildings, Boko Haram militants locked the doors and set the building alight. The occupants were burned alive. 
All of the victims were boys. Reports indicated that the young girls the militants encountered were spared. According to the BBC, the militants told the girls to flee, get married, and shun the western education to which they were privy.
CLICK ON THE TITLE TO READ THE WHOLE THING.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why did Amnesty International only start to care about C.A.R. when the Muslims started losing (the fight they started).

Pastorius said...

I'm sure you mean, "C.A.I.R."

Anonymous said...

Central African Republic

Pastorius said...

Oh, sorry.

Right.

That makes sense.