Huffington Post and Mohammed the Pig's Bitches

Radiant Pig

A while ago Pasto brought this article to my attention in which the idiot writing the article concluded that Mohammed was a champion for human rights. The article, of course, is poorly written with the state of research being utterly horrible. What's worse is that the idiot writing the article, Craig Considine, was (at the time of writing) a PhD candidate at Trinity College in Dublin and also called himself an "interfaith activist". I know for sure I would not be recommending Trinity College, Dublin to anyone seeing that the idiots studying for PhD there don't even know how to research.

Anyway, before I explain what is so horrible about the article in question I just want to clarify that far from being a cheerleader for human rights, Mohammed was a murderer, rapist, slave-trader and a warmonger who only cared about himself. He started out trying to unite some Arab tribes against the Byzantines and the Persians but once he moved to Medina his life and actions were all about himself. He was an asshole, a pig and a piece of turd who deserves ZERO respect from human beings.

The following is some of the laughable idiocy displayed by this Craig Considine that I found completely misleading:

Muhammad's beliefs on how to treat religious minorities make him a universal champion of human rights, particularly as it pertains to freedom of conscience, freedom of worship, and the right for minorities to have protection during times of strife.

Right...let's see what he's referring to:

Muhammad initiated many legal covenants with Christians and Jews after establishing his Muslim community. For example, in one covenant with the Christian monks at Mount Sinai, Egypt, Muhammad called on Muslims to respect Christian judges and churches, and for no Muslim to fight against his Christian brother or sister. Through this agreement, Muhammad made it clear that Islam, as a political and philosophical way of life, respected and protected Christians. 

The "many legal covenants" that this idiot is referring to are only the couple of them that are listed in the article. I haven't read the book that he refers to in the article because I have no interest in wasting my money and also the level of scholarship of that book is evident from the couple of cases that this lunatic discusses in his article.

So let's see, the so-called covenant with the Christian monks at Mount Sinai. Hm interesting. There are a couple of things wrong with this so called covenant. One, Mohammed didn't rule shit in the Mount Sinai area, it was under the rule of the Byzantines. So the only thing this "covenant" would prove is that Mohammed was a piece of turd who was promising something he had no power to promise since Mohammed hated the Byzantines (called them Romans and wanted to wage war against them). Another thing, if this covenant exists, is that Mohammed thought that Christian monks were just waiting to convert to Islam and all they had to do was listen to the Quran and they'd be all Muzzie-like. For example, the pig semen covered Quran says:

Strongest among men in enmity to the Believers wilt thou find the Jews and Pagans; and nearest among them in love to the Believers wilt thou find those who say: "We are Christians:" because amongst these are men devoted to learning and men who have renounced the world, and they are not arrogant.  And when they listen to the revelation received by the Messenger, thou wilt see their eyes overflowing with tears, for they recognise the truth: they pray: "Our Lord! we believe; write us down among the witnesses. (Sura 5:82-83)

Now of course Mohammed was an idiot and a narcissistic bastard so he thought such stupidity but just to drive home the point that he was only talking about monks and not all Christians there, check out the following verse from the Quran:

O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: they are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust. (Sura 5:51)

Mohammed hated all Jews, Christians and pagans except for the monks who he thought were going to bend over for him as soon as he told them what the Quran had to say.

Anyway, so that covenant, if it existed, was based on that understanding by Mo the pig. However, the biggest problem is that no Islamic text, not the Bukhari and Muslim hadiths, nor Ibn Ishaq's Life of Mohammed or anything else refers to this so called covenant. In other words, if you take the earliest texts of Islam its as if Mohammed made no such treaty! GASP!

Moving on:

Similarly, in the Treaty of Maqnah, the Prophet stated Jews "may be in peace... you are in security [under Muhammad's rule]... Towards you is no wrong and no enmity. After today you will not be subject to oppression or violence".

This is the height of hypocrisy and lack of knowledge by this clown named Craig Considine. Let's see what the treaty of Maqna really said:

The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, wrote to Banu Janbah, the Jews of Maqna, and. to (other) people of Maqna, near Aylah: After that, your messengers, while returning to your village, have come to me. On this letter of mine reaching you, you will be safe, with the guarantee of Allah and the guarantee of His Apostle. Verily, the Apostle of Allah is forgiving your shortcomings and sins. Under the guarantee of Allah and the guarantee of His Apostle there will be no cruelty or oppression on you. Verily, the Apostle of Allah, will defend you, against which he defends himself: Verily, for the Apostle of Allah will be the booty which you receive on making peace (with some party) and every slave you get, as well as animals and other objects, except that which the Apostle of Allah or his envoy remits. Verily, it is binding on you to pay one-fourth of the yield of your date palms, and one-fourth of your game from the rivers, and one-fourth of what your women spin, besides that you will be exempt from jizyah and forced labour. If you would listen and obey, it would be for the Apostle of Allah to honour your respected persons and to excuse your mistakes. After that, to the believers and those who submit (muslimin), he who does good to the people of Maqna will be treated well and he who ill-treats them will suffer the consequences. Verily, there will be no Amir on you except one from among you or from the people of the Apostle of Allah, peace be on you. (Tabaqat Ibn Sa'ad)

Now, of course, all of this sounds good to you if you're an enabling piece of shit like Craig Considine but anyone with half a brain will realize that this treaty is no different than any imperialist power taking over your land and giving you protection on its terms, in return for shit they demand. Check out the highlighted parts. If this makes Mo the pig a champion of human rights then every emperor and conquering king and general that ever existed is a human rights champion. I mean, this really is no different than saying to a woman, I will protect you from others as long as you let me rape you whenever I want for as long as you exist. Apparently, Craig Considine thinks such rapists are human rights champions. What a low-life piece of turd this bastard Considine is.

In the Constitution of Medina, a key document which laid out a societal vision for Muslims, Muhammad also singled out Jews, who, he wrote, "shall maintain their own religion and the Muslim theirs... The close friends of Jews are as themselves." In safeguarding the rights of Jews, Muhammad made it clear that a citizen of an Islamic state did not have to follow Islam and that Muslims should treat Jews as they would their own friends. 

 WTF? I don't think he understood what the so called Constitution of Medina says. This document starts with a clear statement that says that the Ummah are the Muslims, both those that followed Mohammed the pig from Mecca and those that welcomed him in Medina. He mentions that the Jews can have their own leaders and live in Medina but the problem is that the Jews were already living in peace in Medina and didn't take part in all the wars going on between the Meccan and Medinian Arabs. This constitution made it so that the Jews were now required to support the looting and murdering and raping carried out by Mohammed and his bandits. For example, point 19 states that: "No separate peace will be made by anyone in Madinah when Believers are fighting in the Path of Allah." This made it obligatory for Jews to fight for Muslims, otherwise they would be considered as aiding the enemy. Point 20 says "The Jews will contribute towards the war when fighting alongside the Believers".  This was a death sentence to the Jews who, thus far, had kept themselves separate from the Arab infighting and were a thriving community in Medina with no intent for warmongering at all.

Lastly, people love to quote that the constitution said: "The Jews of Bani Awf will be treated as one community with the Believers. The Jews have their religion. This will also apply to their freedmen. The exception will be those who act unjustly and sinfully. By so doing they wrong themselves and their families." But the problem is that Mohammed was clear that he and his imaginary gay friend called Allah were the supreme authority in Medina: "When you differ on anything the matter shall be referred to Allah and Mohammed."

At this point some might say that that is how a nation functions, with the leader deciding important matters but the effed up part is that Mohammed wasn't a leader of Medina, he wasn't even Medinian. Some idiots from Medina went and asked him to lead them against Mecca. The Jews had no part in this. All this BS was imposed on them such as you would do to an occupied people. Later Mohammed massacred the Jews because they didn't want to wage war on others on his behalf. And Craig, the piece of turd, Considine wants us to take this damn document of slavery and say "HALLELUJAH, human rights!"? What a dumb, brain-dead asshole!

Lastly:

"An Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab, nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab... a white person has no superiority over a black nor does a black have any superiority over white except by piety and good action."

Yes. So awesome that he refused to free Bilal, a black slave that he owned. Apart from that, the saying that everyone is equal in Islam is nothing new as everyone is equal in XYZ. Romans, long before Mohammed, respected people based on Roman citizenship and not race. What the fuck is so new about any of this? Mohammed wanted the help of all he could get to fight against the Persians and the Byzantines, and hence those who pledged their allegiance to Mohammed by giving up all their freedoms, became equal in his eyes.

You could say that all were equally enslaved by Mohammed. In the end, his narcissistic attitude didn't let him not enslave people of certain races. He wanted power over all.

It seems to me that this idiot Craig Considine wants to be one such slave. Its probably only a matter of time before he flies over to Syria to get the jihadis there to widen his anus so he can plant a bomb inside.

Anyway, this was my analysis. Hope Craig the idiot Considine reads this article and learns a thing or two about research. And if not, sends me a death threat designed after Mohammed's example.