All of us, every single man, woman, and child on the face of the Earth were born with the same unalienable rights; to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And, if the governments of the world can't get that through their thick skulls, then, regime change will be necessary.
Friday, September 18, 2015
We all knew Ronnie, Mr. Obama, and you’re no Reagan
Obama Blocks Navy from Sailing Near Disputed Chinese Islands
Failure to assert passage rights in South China Sea bolsters Beijing’s illegal maritime claims
In
1986 Libya announced that the entire Gulf of SIdra was their
territorial waters. Reagan then did what every commander has done since
1789, he ordered the US Navy to sail directly across the international
waters claimed to ENFORCE freedom of the seas.
But not Mr Obama,
whose mantra is to AVOID anything uncomfortable like confrontations
based in American interest, or our allies NEEDS.
Hello Japan.
Hello Israel,
Hello
Australia (who now openly discus whether China is more important to
them than the USA and who thinks WE are the biggest threat to peace)
Just THIS LAST WEEK, the Chinese military asserted that the entire SOUTH CHINA SEA was CHINESE
GERTZ:
The
Obama administration has restricted the U.S. Pacific Command from
sending ships and aircraft within 12 miles of disputed Chinese-built
islands in the South China Sea, bolstering Beijing’s illegal claims over
the vital seaway, Pentagon leaders revealed to Congress on Thursday.
“The
administration has continued to restrict our Navy ships from operating
within 12 nautical miles of China’s reclaimed islands,” Senate Armed
Services Committee Chairman Sen. John McCain (R., Ariz.) said in opening
remarks criticizing the failure to guarantee safe passage for
international commercial ships in Asia.
“This is a dangerous mistake that grants de facto recognition of China’s man-made sovereignty claims,” he said.
The
South China Sea is a strategic waterway used to transport $5 trillion
annually in goods, including $1.2 trillion in trade to the United
States.
David Shear, assistant defense secretary for Asian and
Pacific affairs, sought to play down the restrictions on Navy ship
transits close to the islands. According to Shear, a regional freedom of
navigation exercise took place in April and the tactic is “one tool in a
larger tool box … and we’re in the process of putting together that
tool box.”
Shear acknowledged that “we have not recently gone
within 12 miles of a reclaimed area,” noting the last time a Navy ship
sailed that close to a Chinese-built island was 2012.
The
disclosure undermines statements made Wednesday by Defense Secretary Ash
Carter who said the United States would not be coerced by China into
not operating ships or aircraft in Asia. Carter said the United States
“will continue to protect freedom of navigation and overflight.”
Shear
insisted that in recent years the U.S. military has challenged “every
category of Chinese claim in the South China Sea, as recently as this
year.”
Blocking China from militarizing the new islands could
include a range of options, including freedom of navigation operations,
he said.
McCain, however, noted that the U.S. restrictions on
close-in island military flights and ship visits were continuing despite
the provocative dispatch of five Chinese warships in an unprecedented
deployment to waters within 12 miles of Alaska’s Aleutian Islands—at the
same time President Obama was concluding a recent visit to the state
earlier this month.
A visibly angered McCain told Shear the best
way to assert that international waters around the islands do not belong
to China would be for American ships to make 12-mile passages by the
disputed islands. “And we haven’t done that since 2012. I don’t find
that acceptable, Mr. Secretary,” he said.
Adm. Harry Harris,
commander of the U.S. Pacific Command, was asked if he is authorized to
order ships to travel within 12 miles of any of the man-made islands and
answered, no. Harris also said no U.S. surveillance aircraft have flown
directly over any of the islands.
Asked why not, Harris stated:
“I’ll just [say] that Pacom presents options, military options to the
secretary. And those options come with a full range of opportunities in
the South China Sea, and we’re ready to execute those options when
directed.”
The restrictions appear to be an element of the Obama
administration’s conciliatory policies toward China that have increased
in the months leading up to the planned visit to Washington next week by
Chinese President Xi Jinping.
The administration also has not
taken steps to penalize China for large-scale hacking of U.S. government
and private sector databases, although sanctions are planned.
China
has been building islands on several reefs within the South China Sea
for the past several years near the Paracels, in the northwestern sea,
and near the Spratlys, near the Philippines. Several nations, including
Vietnam, Philippines, and Malaysia have challenged Chinese claims to
maritime sovereignty.
After ignoring the island building for
several years, the Obama administration earlier this year began pressing
the Chinese to halt the construction. The U.S. appeals were ignored.
A Chinese admiral recently declared that the entire South China Sea is China’s maritime territory.
“The
South China Sea is no more China’s than the Gulf of Mexico is
Mexico’s,” said Harris, who described himself as critic of China’s
maritime behavior and large-scale military buildup.
Harris made
clear implicitly during the hearing he did not agree with the
restrictions on transit near the disputed islands but has been overruled
by the president and secretary of defense.
“I think that we must exercise our freedom of navigation throughout the region …,” Harris said.
Pressed
for his views on whether close passage of U.S. ships in the sea should
be permitted, Harris said: “I believe that we should [be] allow[ed] to
exercise freedom of navigation and flight—maritime and flight in the
South China Sea against those islands that are not islands.”
Asked
if he has requested permission for close-in island transits, Harris
would not say, stating only that he has provided policy options for
doing so to civilian leaders.
Harris said Pacific command surface
ship commanders and crews, as well as Air Force pilots and crews, have
orders when operating near China to “insist on our right to operate in
international airspace and maritime space” and to respond professionally
when challenged by Chinese warships or interceptor jets.
The
four-star admiral warned that more incidents, such as the dangerous
aerial intercept of a P-8 surveillance jet by a Chinese jet in 2014, are
possible after China finishes building runways on Fiery Cross Reef and
two other reefs.
With missiles, jet fighters, and warships
stationed on the islands, “it creates a mechanism by which China would
have de facto control over the South China Sea in any scenario short of
war,” he said.
In a conflict the sites could be easily targeted,
but “short of that, militarization of these features pose a threat, and
certainly it poses a threat against all other countries in the region,”
he said.
Shear also said the island militarization is a concern.
“The
Chinese have not yet placed advanced weaponry on those features and we
are going to do everything we can to ensure that they don’t,” Shear
said. “This is going to be a long-term effort. There are no silver
bullets in this effort. But we’re certainly complicating Chinese
calculations already.”
Shear said U.S. forces are continuing to operate freely in the region and have deterred Chinese coercion of regional states.
“That we freely operate in the South China Sea is a success? It’s a pretty low bar, Mr. Secretary,” McCain said.
China’s
dispatch of five warships to waters near the Bering Strait followed
recent joint exercises with the Russians, after which the Chinese ships
sailed near Alaska to demonstrated the ships’ ability to operate in the
far north, Harris said, noting that he viewed the timing to the
president’s Alaska visit as “coincidental.”
Sen. Dan Sullivan,
(R., Alaska) said the Chinese action was a “provocation” and criticized
the administration’s weak response. The Pentagon dismissed the Chinese
ship transit as legal under international law.
“I thought it was
more of a provocation and a demonstration of their interest in the
Arctic,” Sullivan said. “I’m not sure that this White House would
recognize a provocation if it was slapped in the face, and we need to be
aware of that.”
Harris also said he is concerned by China deploying submarines, including nuclear missile submarines, further from its shores.
“We’re
seeing Chinese submarine deployments extend further and further, almost
with every deployment,” he said. “It has become routine for Chinese
submarines to travel to the Horn of Africa region and North Arabian Sea
in conjunction with their counter piracy task force operations. We’re
seeing their ballistic missiles submarines travel in the Pacific at
further ranges and of course all of those are of concern.”
China’s claims to have halted island construction and militarization on some 3,000 acres are false, McCain said.
“Recently
released satellite images show clearly this is not true,” the senator
said. “What’s more, China is rapidly militarizing this reclaimed land,
building garrisons, harbors, intelligence, and surveillance
infrastructure, and at least three air strips that could support
military aircraft.”
Surface-to-air missiles and radars also could
be added enabling China “to declare and enforce an air defense
identification zone in the South China Sea, and to hold that vital
region at risk,” McCain added.
Shear said the island building is nearly completed.
Meanwhile
in the House, Rep. J. Randy Forbes (R., Va.), chairman of the House
Armed Services subcommittee on seapower, led a group of 29 members of
Congress in writing to President Obama and Carter, the defense
secretary, urging the lifting of the restrictions on naval and air
operations near the disputed islands.
“The longer the United
States goes without challenging China’s unfounded claims to sovereignty
over these artificial formations—and to territorial waters and exclusive
economic rights in the surrounding water—the greater the consequences
will be for regional security,” the lawmakers stated in the Sept. 17
letter.
“It is our belief that the Defense Department should act
immediately to reaffirm the United States’ commitment to freedom of
navigation and the rule of law.”
No comments:
Post a Comment