Whenever Any Form of Government Becomes Destructive To These Ends,
It Is The Right of the People to Alter Or To Abolish It,
And To Institute New Government

click.jpg

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Co-Founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, Shows That Anthropogenic Global Warming Is a Hoax



Patrick Moore states:
"How about the United Nations Inter-governmental panel on Climate Change? Unfortunately, they are totally conflicted by their own mandate. 
See, their brief is to focus on 'a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere'. They are not required to consider the many natural factors that affect the climate. So, if the IPCC were to find that humans were not the main cause of climate change - or - that the changes were beneficial, there would be no need for them to exist."

True. But also consider:
UN IPCC Official Admits 'We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy' 

Now think about it for a second. If one wanted to redistribute wealth through taxes, what would one choose to tax?

See this clip from the video in which Patrick Moore reveals:
"Is the earth warming. Well, yes. There's been slight warming in the past 300 years since the peak of the little ice age.
But guess what? There's no scientific proof that this is caused by carbon dioxide and simply asserting a hypothesis does not prove it to be true.
But that doesn't stop environmentalists, activists, and the most troubling, politicians from calling carbon dioxide a toxic pollutant that will destroy life and bring civilization to its knees. It's so bad, that governments say we need to tax it."
****
Perhaps they could have opted to tax every grain of sand instead . It would have made just about as much sense.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link#

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Patrick Moore states:
"How about the United Nations Inter-governmental panel on Climate Change? Unfortunately, they are totally conflicted by their own mandate.
See, their brief is to focus on 'a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere'. They are not required to consider the many natural factors that affect the climate. So, if the IPCC were to find that humans were not the main cause of climate change - or - that the changes were beneficial, there would be no need for them to exist."

True. But also consider:
UN IPCC Official Admits 'We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy'

Now think about it for a second. If one wanted to redistribute wealth through taxes, what would one choose to tax?

See this clip from the video in which Patrick Moore reveals:
"Is the earth warming. Well, yes. There's been slight warming in the past 300 years since the peak of the little ice age.
But guess what? There's no scientific proof that this is caused by carbon dioxide and simply asserting a hypothesis does not prove it to be true.
But that doesn't stop environmentalists, activists, and the most troubling, politicians from calling carbon dioxide a toxic pollutant that will destroy life and bring civilization to its knees. It's so bad, that governments say we need to tax it."
****
Perhaps they could have opted to tax every grain of sand instead . It would have made just about as much sense.

Thursday, September 22, 2016 1:49:00 am  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home