At this point, with 40% reporting, Trump is ahead of Hillary by 2%.
LA Times predicted 3%.
All other polls (except for IBD) had Hillary up between 3% and 12% for the past few weeks.
If Trump wins the popular vote (even if he loses the election, which he easily could even at this point), what will the History books say about the clearcut collusion of the media - even to the point of FALSIFYING POLL RESULTS?!!?!!??!??!???
Has this kind of shit ever happened before in the history of our nation?
What have we become?
FROM GATEWAY PUNDIT:
The New York Times presidential predictor page is showing Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump with a 73 percent chance of winning the presidency as of 9:12 p.m. CST.
UPDATE - WOWZA!!!
Attn fellow reporters: It is time to write an alternate lede pic.twitter.com/hkj4kORcHr— Rebecca Berg (@rebeccagberg) November 9, 2016
3 comments:
My personal prediction - now shared for all of my adoring fans - was a 5 point spread between Trump and Clinton.
* The peasants beyond the moat have spoken.
Always on Watch - I am gonna collect on that bet I made with you in June of 2015.
I don't think Trump is going to get 5%.
I think he may pull off a 1 1/2% win. He may lose the popular vote by up to 1%.
At this point, however, it looks like he will win the electoral.
This is a very weird election.
NBC has Trump ahead by 3 million in the popular vote.
Post a Comment