New Peer-Reviewed Study Asks: Were COVID Injections Engineered to Harm?

Here is a Peer Reviewed papers about vaccine harm. This paper makes the case that the mRNA injections were in fact, created to be harmful. That they are indeed a weapon. That this was not incompetence, but malice.

Here is an article about the study.

A few paragraphs:

We’ve spent years documenting the injuries, studying the mechanisms, and tracing the signals. There’s no doubt the harm caused by the COVID-19 virus and its mRNA countermeasures is real—but what if it wasn’t incidental but engineered?

It’s a bombastic claim, but not without evidence:

• In 2018, a DARPA-funded proposal outlined a plan to insert a furin cleavage site into bat coronaviruses—exactly the feature that later appeared in SARS-CoV-2.
• In early 2020, emails and meeting notes show top scientists coordinated efforts to suppress lab-origin discussions, later authoring the now-debunked Proximal Origin paper.

A new peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons raises that exact possibility. Co-authored by IMA Chief Scientific Officer Dr. Paul Marik alongside a dozen other high-credibility researchers and clinicians, the paper lays out extensive, interdisciplinary evidence that both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines bear hallmarks of deliberate design—and that their global rollout has resulted in catastrophic health outcomes.