They’re at it again. Muslims playing the victim card, though this time low-keyed.
A New Jersey Muslim group is launching a nationwide effort to record complaints about Muslims being wrongfully detained or questioned at airports to determine where the worst problem areas are. The group has received several complaints from Muslims using airports in New Jersey and New York that they were detained and questioned for hours when attempting to return to the country from abroad. The group has received several complaints from Muslims using airports in New Jersey and New York that they were detained and questioned for hours when attempting to return to the country from abroad.
Nowhere in the article does the Muslim group give a hint on why Muslims returning to this country. How about these for recent reasons? The reality vs the perception?
The Muslim teacher suspended for refusing to work without her veil is connected to a hardline mosque where the ringleader of the July 7 bombers worshipped, it has emerged. The family are known to worship there and may have encountered Khan before his terrorist act. However, there is no suggestion that Miss Azmi or anyone in her family have any connection with terrorism. The mosque is run by Tablighi Jamaat, a radical Islamic movement believed by intelligence agencies to be a fertile source for recruiting young extremists. Two months ago, Tablighi emerged as a link between several of the men arrested over the plot to use liquid bombs to blow up transatlantic airliners. Richard Reid, the jailed shoebomber who tried to blow up a flight to America, also attended mosques run by the group.As a woman, Miss Azmi is more likely to pray at home than attend the mosque, although it does have a room reserved for females. But her father, Dr Mohammed Mulk, is understood to be a regular, and is named as a joint headmaster of the mosque's school, Jaamia Talimul Islam.
Gee. Do you think she got her radical ideas from her father and the preaching in that mosque that produced a homicide bomber? And another reality check.
A leading British Muslim was kicked off a flight to the USA because of his links to an 'extremist' youth group. Kamal Helbawy, 67, a founding member of the Muslim Association of Britain, was told by airline staff he was barred from flying to New York shortly before the plane was due to leave London Heathrow. Egyptian-born Mr Helbawy has previously been criticised for his links to the increasingly radical World Assembly of Muslim Youth - which he co-founded several decades ago.
And I just couldn’t pass up this parting remark in the article.
Some police leaders have called for tolerance and claimed there is a danger of creating an offence of 'travelling while Asian'.
Or is it North African, Middle-Eastern – oh, heck – Muslim!
But believe it or not, there are some who do believe it’s the Muslims fault that they are being singled out. Does it come from non-Muslims? Nope. Surprise! Surprise! Egypt.
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak is urging Muslims to accept some of the responsibility for the way Islam is seen around the world. Many Muslims are angry about drawings in the West mocking the prophet and about accusations that Islam encourages terrorism. But Mubarak asked what Muslims had done to confront terrorists who say they act in the name of Islam. "Shouldn't we Muslims shoulder part of the responsibility of these wrong ideas about Islam? Have we fulfilled our duty in correcting the image of Islam and the Muslims? What did we do to face a terrorism that wears Islam's cloak and targets the lives of the people," Mubarak said in the remarks that were televised live. Muslims have strayed from the essence of Islam and need to return to its principles of "forgiveness, righteousness and reform," he said.
I’m afraid Mubarak is trolling for the Anwar Sadat Assassination Award.
3 comments:
Dear friends of the Infidel Bloggers Alliance
the Pope was lately heavily criticized and hardly well-known itself publicly to his speech. We want to change that and for the Vatikan a Petition submit and the Pope support.
Who has homepage, blog etc., a banner can bring in there:
http://www.antiislamisten.de/html/copy.html
We ask all, which attach importance to free expressions of opinion, to sign the Petition:
http://www.gopetition.com/online/9659.html
Blog-Team "die Realität"
Switzerland
De Paul University's Future?
http://FrontPage magazine.com
Thursday, October 19, 2006
Britain's Surrender to Radical Islam
By Denis MacShane
Telegraph.co.uk | October 19, 2006
At long last, the debate on Islamism as politics, not Islam as
religion, is out in the open. Two weeks ago, Jack Straw might
have felt he was taking a risk when publishing his now
notorious article on the Muslim veil. However, he was pushing
at an open door. From across the political spectrum there is
now common consent that the old multicultural emperor, before
whom generation of politicians have made obeisance, is now a
pitiful, naked sight.
The 10,000 Muslims in my constituency of Rotherham can only
benefit from removing the dead hand of ideological Islamism –
allowing their faith to be respected and their children to
flourish in a Britain that finally wakes up to what must be
done. Despite the efforts of extremists to prevent any sort of
rational debate about the place of Islam in Britain, it is at
last happening.
A fight-back is beginning to reclaim Britain from the grip of
those who refuse to acknowledge the centrality of British
values of tolerance, fair play and parliamentary democratic
freedoms – notably those of free speech and respect for all
religions, but supremacy for none. Voltaire noted this
attribute of the English three centuries ago, when he wrote:
"If there was just one religion in Britain there would be
despotism. If two, there would be civil war. But as there are
30, they all live at peace with each other."
It is worth returning to Voltaire on this issue. The struggle
is not between religion and secularism, nor between the West
and Islam, and still less between Bush-Blair and the Taliban
or Iraqi insurgents. It is the ideologisation – an ugly word
for an ugly thing – of religion that needs confronting. Return
to Voltaire who noted, "Neither Montaigne, Locke, Boyle,
Spinoza, Hobbes, or Lord Shaftesbury lighted up the firebrand
of discord in their countries; this has generally been the
work of divines, who, being at first puffed up with the
ambition of becoming chiefs of a sect, soon grew very desirous
of being at the head of a party."
The row ignited by Jack Straw has, so to speak, ripped away
the veil over the failure of British policy-makers since the
1980s to come to grips with growing ideological Islamism in
our midst.
In David Blunkett's diaries, he refers to the arrest of the
Finsbury Park radical Islamist imam, Abu Hamza, in January
2003. Mr Blunkett records: "We had been to-ing and fro-ing on
this for months." For months! For years, every other
politician in Europe had been complaining about the failure of
Britain to act against Hamza and the other ideologues of hate
who were turning young Muslim minds – long before 9/11 or the
Iraq conflict – into cauldrons of hate against democracy, and
some, tragically, into self-immolating killers of innocent
men, women and children.
Where Blunkett and previous ministers failed to act, it has
taken a young, devoutly religious Christian politician, in the
form of Ruth Kelly, who knows the difference between private
faith and public politics, to come forward and to speak en
clair to organisations and ideologues who believed that their
world view would – and should – overcome British values and
traditions.
An all-party commission on anti-Semitism that I chaired
reported recently. Our most worrying discovery was the
complacency on many university campuses about harassment of
Jewish students. Jew-baiting behaviour that would have had the
Left outraged in the 1930s is now actively encouraged by an
unholy alliance of the hard Left and Islamist fundamentalists,
and the odious anti-Semites who have infiltrated some
lecturers' unions. Ruth Kelly, whose fealty to her faith
matches that of any deeply religious British Muslim, is right
to make clear there are now limits which must not be
overstepped.
As a Foreign Office minister, I tried to get Whitehall to take
the issue seriously. I argued that diplomats who spoke
relevant languages should go and talk, discuss and report back
to ministers.
Chinese walls in Whitehall prevented effective
inter-departmental co-operation. The Home Office, in addition
to allowing Hamza to poison the minds of a generation, refused
to return to France Rashid Ramda, who was wanted for
questioning in connection with the 1995 Paris Metro bombings –
a foretaste of our own 7/7. I hated having to go on French
television and waffle defensively at a policy of not
extraditing this evil man. But the prevailing culture was to
deal with religious leaders, not elected politicians.
Whitehall sought the advice of friendly theologians from
Cairo, or Muslim ideologues such as Tariq Ramadan. This denied
political space to British citizens of Muslim faith, women as
well as men.
Late in 2003, I made a routine speech to my constituency. It
followed the murder of British and Turkish men and women at
our consulate in Istanbul by Islamist terrorists. At the same
time, a young South Yorkshire Muslim had gone to Israel and
killed himself in a suicide bombing attack.
The two events led me to make a speech in which I said: "It is
time for the elected and community leaders of British Muslims
to make a choice: it is the democratic, rule of law, if you
like the British or Turkish or American or European way –
based on political dialogue and non-violent protests – or it
is the way of the terrorists against which the whole
democratic world is now uniting." I thought my remarks were
banal. After 7/7, everyone used them.
But, three years ago, the chairman of the Commission for
Racial Equality, Trevor Phillips wrote a whole page in the
Observer denouncing me. The Foreign Office and Downing Street
would not allow me to defend my position. It was an ugly,
uncomfortable time, as no one in Whitehall or the media showed
any support for efforts to get a debate going on issues that
today rightly predominate. Red boxes are here today and gone
tomorrow. But if a minister is to be dismissed for telling the
truth, even if the telling of the truth is not perfectly
timed, then this or any government is in trouble.
Islamist politics is now one of the most important issues for
the future of democracy. Getting the right answers will define
the world's future. All main parties, other than the odious
BNP, rightly shun Islamophobia. British Muslims will be
welcome at Eid parties in the Commons to celebrate the end of
Ramadan. But we have to find answers to calls for censorship,
to celebrations of jihadist terror, or a religiously ordained
world view that denies equal rights for women or gays here and
in Afghanistan.
Some difficult politics lies ahead. It is bizarre that neither
David Cameron nor Sir Menzies Campbell have spoken. At some
stage, the metro-populism of Notting Hill will have to engage
with the worries of British citizens who understand a problem
long before Whitehall gets it.
There is a new generation of British Muslims who want to
engage in politics and reclaim the issues that concern their
communities from religious-based outfits or those who see
their task as importing foreign conflicts into domestic
British politics.
They must be encouraged before it is too late. From Margaret
Thatcher, until very recently Tony Blair, political leaders
have been in denial. It is time to wake up.
Click Here to support Frontpagemag.com.
Denis MacShane is Labour MP for Rotherham and worked at the
Foreign Office as PPS and minister, 1997-2005.
Copyright©2006 FrontPageMagazine.com | Privacy Policy
As of this date, we still have not had a reply from representatives of United Muslims Moving Ahead and even Professor Finklestein has been Silent!
Now what a way to treat an old Blue Demon!
Perhaps they're busy memorizing the Muslim Peace book -
Koran 47:4
When you meet the unbelievers in the Jihad strike off their heads and, when you have laid them low, bind your captives firmly. Then grant them their freedom or take ransom from them, until War shall lay down her burdens.
Koran 52:1-52:15
On that day they shall be sternly thrown into the fire of Hell, and a voice will say to them: 'This is the Fire which you denied...Burn in its flames. It is the same whether or not you show forbearance. You shall be rewarded according to your deeds.'
Koran 69:30-37
We shall say: 'Lay hold of him and bind him. Burn him in the fire of Hell, then fasten him with a chain seventy cubits long. For he did not believe Allah the tremendous, and urged not on the feeding of the wretched. Today he shall be friendless here; filth shall be his food, the filth which sinners eat...
Koran 9:5
"Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolators wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful."
Koran 9:73
Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their Home: an evil fate.
Let us pray (That uniquely CATHOLIC prayer)
St. Michael, the Archangel, Defend us in battle. Be our defense against the wickedness and snares of the Devil. May God rebuke him, we humbly pray. And do Thou, O heavenly host, through the Power of God, THRUST INTO HELL SATAN, and all the EVIL SPIRITS THAT PROWL ABOUT THE WORLD SEEKING THE RUIN OF SOULS AMEN.
Fear not, for I am with you. I have called you by name, you are Mine. When you pass through the waters, I shall be with you. When you walk through the fire, you shall not be burned, nor shall the flames scorch you. For I am the Lord, your God, the Holy One of Israel, your Savior." Isaiah 43:1b-3a
Remember MOHAMMED The obliterator."! (nickname given by Tabari)
"I say to our enemies: We are coming. God may have mercy on you, but we won't." Senator John MacCain
Praise the Lord and God Bless America,
Zionist/Infidel/Neocon/Crusader/Jew/Kafir
George M Weinert V
George M Weinert V
American Jihad Blog
Terror Web
Islamsux Blog
Queer Jihad Blog
Fine commentary by Walid Phares on the Newsweek "Caliwho" sleight-of-hand. Link is http://hnn.us/articles/31036.html or just check Phares' website.
Post a Comment