Thursday, February 07, 2008

Archbishop Of Canterbury: Sharia Law In The UK Unavoidable


The Archbishop Rowan Williams is digging out quite a niche for himself in this world. He will be remembered as among the biggest traitors and stooges in history; right up there with Benedict Arnold and Judas Iscariot.

Now, he is saying that it is unavoidable that the UK will have to adopt certain parts of Sharia law (thanks to Vadim of World Divided):


Dr Rowan Williams told Radio 4’s World at One that the UK has to “face up to the fact” that some of its citizens do not relate to the British legal system.

Dr Williams argues that adopting parts of Islamic Sharia law would help maintain social cohesion.
Dr Williams said an approach to law which simply said "there's one law for everybody and that's all there is to be said, and anything else that commands your loyalty or allegiance is completely irrelevant in the processes of the courts - I think that's a bit of a danger".



Vadim comments:


I have never seen such a miserable display of appeasement, dhimmitude and lack of back bone by the leader.

What the Archbishop and others like him do not realize is that this kind of attitude will lead the common citizens of the UK to taking the law to their own hands, after being betrayed by their religious and political leaders.

Speaking of religious leaders, I am not sure about how the Archbishop is elected, but I wonder if there is one Christian in UK who thinks that this person, Dr. Williams, is the right one to lead the Church, unless the goal of the Church is a complete surrender of its religious and historical assets and values in the Kingdom.


I think Rowan Williams ought to not only be relieved of his duties, but, as his duty involves not only clerical responsibility a responsibility to the leadership of the state as well, he ought to be tried for treason,

AND HUNG UNTIL DEAD.
Sharia law is Islamic law. As such, it is the law of the land in Islamic nations. It is, in fact, the constitution of Saudi Arabia. As such, Rowan Williams is here advocating for superimposing the Saudi Arabian constitution over the British charter of government. This is treason.
All those Brits who go about their daily lives, working, paying taxes, and abiding by the rules, must feel awfully let down by their government when a high official of said government can openly commit treason, and not even a peep is heard.
This is an example of the complete British governments complete neglect of responsibility to its own stated principles.
When the government doesn't live up to its own obligations to its citizens, then, one has to wonder, should not the citizens must take matters into their own hands?
Rowan Williams must be removed from office. We can not allow anymore of this.
By the way, for those of you keeping score at home, this makes three completely insane stories to have come out of merry old England in the past week;
and now,
3) Rowan Williams bends over and begs for prison sex.
A false argument.

If a Muslim couple wants to take their disputes to a imam, a group of elders, or whatever, there is nothing preventing them from doing this right now, if they both agree to abide by the ruling. I could do the same right here with my preacher. This is not really what they are asking for with shariah law.

Years ago we had a Muslim poster here for a few days insisting that things like requiring the veil weren't wrong because it is what the people wanted. If it was what every single woman wanted, there would be no need for a requirement, they just would. Requirements imply punishment, and punishment means forcing it on people who don't want it.

There will be punishments for those who don't use the shariah courts, and of course, no one talks about those laws of shariah that directly conflict with the law of the land in England.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

DUTCH COURAGE

Netherlands to ban the burqa (could you imagine Gordon Brownlips doing that here?)

"Earlier, the cabinet agreed that burqas would be banned for government workers and at schools. On Friday, the government is expected to announce that burqas will also be banned from public transport. And for those of you cynical enough to believe that all of this has anything to do with Islamophobia, the ban, if introduced, will also apply to balaclavas and crash helmets.

De Volkskrant writes that a ban on burqas was first proposed by Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders in 2005, but the previous cabinet never got round to it as a result of internal divisions.

The current government coalition has decided against a general ban on burqas, arguing that a ban is only justified when the garment in question ‘seriously hampers integration and communication’.

However, when this is the case, societal interests outweigh religious freedoms such as the wearing of burqas."


http://www.expatica.com/nl/articles/news/RNW-Press-Review-_-Thursday-7-February-2008.html

Meanwhile, unbelievable dhimmitude from the tree-hugging Archdruid of Canterbury.

Pastorius said...

Najistani,
Thanks for the link.

At what point do the citizens of the UK take Rowan Williams from his office and tar and feather him in the street?

At what point do the citizens of the UK decide that they will no longer tolerate this man's relentless sedition?

Pastorius said...

By the way, this is the smoking gun, but he has been hinting in this direction for years.

Anonymous said...

Pastorius, thank you for crossposting it.

When I read this interview I was stunned. There is no limit to what this man is ready to surrender to the Muslims...and for what? What does he achieve by that? How does he serve his parish better by allowing the Sharia in the UK?

I am an Israeli, but I feel very bad for my friends in UK. Now, after reading this, I begin to seriously worry about the future of their children in the UK.

Pastorius said...

I am an American, born and bred here.

But, my family is British, and they all live in the UK.

Some people may notice I write about Britain quite a bit. That's the reason for it.

Anonymous said...

Pastorius, as you rightly said in the article:
This man must be removed from his post, simple and clear. He's just plain dangerous for Britain.

Anonymous said...

Archbishop Of Canterbury: Sharia Law In The UK Unavoidable

You know what else is unavoidable? Death and Taxes.

Perhaps it's time he resign, preferably forcibly removed from religous protections, and get introduced to these most familiar un-avoidables.

Mark said...

To Vadim:

The Archbishop if Canterbury is not elected; he is appointed by the prime minister of the day.

Mark said...

This is the most depressing news coming out of the UK yet. It's coming to something when the Archbishop of Canterbury, the leader of the worldwide Anglican Communion, comes out with TOSH like this.

But then, what should we expect of such a weak man? He has weakness written all over his face.

Some of you might like to click onto my website, where you can listen to the idiot being interviewed by the BBC.

I am sorry to use such strong language; but I can think of no other way of describing the man.

The sooner we get rid of this Archbishop, the better it will be for all of us. He is danger not only to the Church, but to the country as a whole.

This utterance will do nothing if not embolden British Muslims who are already pushing hard for the introduction of Shariah law in the UK.

In any good, functioning society, there must be ONE law for ALL citizens. Anything else is TOTALLY unacceptable. But TOTALLY!

I wouldn't mind betting on it that there are many Muslims, especially Muslimatoon (plural of Muslimah), who will be horrified by this, since I feel sure that many have come to the UK to escape Shariah law in the first place.

This is the thin edge of the wedge. A few days ago, it was anounced that polygamous marriages are to be recognized by the state, and paid for in extra benefits by the taxpayers. Now this idiocy! Where will it all end? The only end I can see is in the Islamization of the country. Now that will be a sad end. But to use the Archbishop's own word, it seems that such a scenario will be 'unavoidable' if we go any further down this road.

The country is on a slippery slope!

Pastorius said...

It seems to me the people have to fight to take their country back from these strange people (like Rowan Williams) who believe it is theirs to give away.

Epaminondas said...

This is as if Tantawi and Qaradawi stood together to advise that buddhism is the way to go.

This complete idiot, this morally bankrupt COWARD, has emboldened abu Hamza and every single SOB who wants us and how we live dead.

Never mind a rail or tar and feathers, he is a traitor to every right won since 1215.

If there is not an outpouring of righteous indignation from britons everywhere ..it is the marker for the end.

Anonymous said...

was listening to a discussion about this issue on the BBC World Service when someone said that there were Jewish courts in the UK so why should there not be Sharia courts. I did not even know there were Jewish courts, with legal authority in Britain. Why on earth do British Jewish people have a separate court system, how did that come about?! I thought I lived in a secular country but apparently not! Just another reason, in my opinion, to abolish the House of Lords and give the British people the power!

Orthodox Jewish courts, what next, Mormon courts, Scientologist courts...?!?

Pastorius said...

Yeah, I don't know why there are Jewish courts in the UK. However, you and I both know that Jews are creating death and mayhem around the world.

And, by the way, you don't live in a secular country. You live in a country where the Anglican Church is part of the government.

But, having been there, I agree with you that it does SEEM like a secular country.