Sunday, April 05, 2009

Ayn Rand: Objectively Speaking

Perusing the new book arrivals at the Kansas State University library, I was pleasantly surprised to find a new hardback copy of Objectively Speaking: Ayn Rand Interviewed. This work, edited by Marlene Podritske and Peter Schwartz, contains transcripts of dozens of interviews of Rand. The book begins with a short interview from 1932 when Rand was working as an unknown scriptwriter in Hollywood. The largest section of the book is devoted to the period in the early and mid 1960s when Rand was interviewed on numerous occasions at American universities.

The last section contains interviews from both television and radio. The last part of the book provides fascinating discussions between Rand and such personalities as Mike Wallace, Johnny Carson, and Edwin Newman. This last is one of my favorites. Newman is critical, but not hostile. Unlike most mainstream media types today, Newman knows how to ask intelligent questions that cut to the heart of the matter. At the end of the interview, which took place in 1972 on NBC, Newman asks Rand on whether her novel Atlas Shrugged is "happening today." Rand's answer is just as relevant now as then:

Yes, I see the novel coming true in a more literal sense than I ever expected: the destruction of reason, the orgy of altruism, the demands for sacrifice of everybody to everybody else, complete intellectual chaos, the destruction of the independence of industry. The one thing I didn't predict, because I couldn't have reached that state of imagination, is the ecological crusade. That's the cherry on the cake - the attempt to obliterate industry openly, blatantly, consciously.
One could at that Rand did not anticipate the abject Western surrender to Islam under the guise of multiculturalism as the nuts on top of the cake.

This book is required reading for anyone interested in the ideas of Ayn Rand.

Crossposted at The Dougout

5 comments:

revereridesagain said...

Does the book come with a CD? I would love for people to be able to see those interviews as well as read them. Some of them can be found on the internet.

RRA BACK-IN-THE-DAY-RAND-STORY ALERT---

She appeared on Johnny Carson 3 times and gained one of the highest ratings of any guest. (She also carried her handbag onto the set 3 times!) The first interview she look petrified and by the third one she was a totally relaxed veteran. They are great to watch. At least once Carson cancelled the other guests and devoted the whole 90 minutes to her.

Please tell me they include the one where she teaches Phil Donahue the meaning of devotion and real class with her response to his trying to emotionally blackmail her into wishing for an afterlife following husband Frank O'Connor's death.

About 1968 she was going to be interviewed by some jerk in I think it was Cleveland and she cancelled when he sent her a question list that included, "Well, Miss Rand, since neither of us has ever had to go hungry..." This to a woman who was reduced to eating handfuls of dried beans to avoid starvation in the USSR. What really bugged her was that the guy hadn't even done his homework enough to know something about her background.

Anonymous said...

Does anybody else think there seems to be some "anti-Galt" going on? Ted Olson defending Koh (based on Koh's "academic standing," NOT his policies), the Danish PM apologizing for the cartoons, Michael Steele (almost anything he says publicly), the banks not marching down to federal court the nanosecond after the person currently occupying the WH (who seems to be running a protection racket - pitchforks, anyone?) purports to be able to REFUSE a repayment of TARP funds to the US Treasury????

Am I seeing a trend, or is this just ODS?

revereridesagain said...

Believe it or not it is going to take much more than this to light a fire under most of these people. The last talk Rand gave, I think it was in New Orleans, was her mopping up the floor with a bunch of business executives over their thinking it was in their best interest to suck up to government and line up for handouts.

They will evade and rationalize and minimize and deny and compromise and, in most cases, submit. Some of them thinks that's the "responsible" way to behave. Some are pragmatists who will try to go along with anything that even appears to "work" however temporarily. Many (certainly in the company for which I still nominally work) will try to accommodate any level of irrational dehumanizing nonsense to hold on to their jobs. They refuse to believe that this isn't the worst that can happen yet. They are ashamed to take a stand on principles even if they have any because their colleagues will call them "unprofessional". Most don't even want to try to consider the greater implications of what is happening. Some of them are already living in fear and that thug now occupying the White House has openly demanded that they obey or be thrown to the mob. Perhaps the most difficult attitude to surmount is "well, we've faced hard times before and everything worked out all right, it will this time too...".

But some day it won't.

revereridesagain said...

Interesting... started re-reading "Atlas" and who I'm getting very strongly for Dagny is Cate Blanchett...

Anonymous said...

Revereridesagain,

Sorry, no CD. The book doesn't include the Phil Donahue interview. But, it does have lots of lesser known ones.