All of us, every single man, woman, and child on the face of the Earth were born with the same unalienable rights; to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And, if the governments of the world can't get that through their thick skulls, then, regime change will be necessary.
Your comment, by the way, had nothing to do with what I posted.
This post is not a rah rah pro-America post. You must not understand the reference to the Book of Revelation which is laid into the post.
China can not make war with the US. The US's military is so superior to that of every other military on Earth that it is as if we are a force of invading aliens from another galaxy when we hit other countries.
We could turn China into liquid glass quicker than they could blink. And almost every bit of technology China does have they either stole from us, or bought from us, and you know it.
You're so busy with your hatred what has happened to America that your thoughts are clouded by it.
By the way, this war with the ME is a proxy war being waged on the US by China and Russia. The reason they wage proxy war is PRECISELY BECAUSE THEY COULD NEVER BEAT US IN A REAL WAR.
I suspect there is a much larger plan afoot at the Pentagon and State, with regards to China, than you would ever guess.
Bush began his first term with China as his priority. Because of 9/11 it appeared that he changed priorities.
The truly commanding objective - the underlying basis for budgets and troop deployments - is the containment of China. This objective governed White House planning during the administration's first seven months in office, only to be set aside by the perceived obligation to highlight anti-terrorism after
September 11, 2001; but now, despite President George W Bush's preoccupation with Iraq and Iran, the White House is also reemphasizing its paramount focus on China, risking a new Asian arms race with potentially catastrophic consequences.
Bush and his top aides entered the White House in early 2001 with a clear strategic objective: to resurrect the permanent-dominance doctrine spelled out in the Defense Planning Guidance (DPG) for fiscal years 1994-99, the first formal statement of US strategic goals in the post-Soviet era. According to the initial official draft of this document, as leaked to the press in early 1992, the primary aim of US strategy would be to bar the rise of any future competitor that might challenge America's overwhelming military superiority.
"Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival ... that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union," the document stated. Accordingly, "we [must] endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power".
So, put on your thinking cap, cuz you are a good thinker, and tell me why if the Bush Admin. wanted to contain China, we would buy unprecedented amounts of goods from China in what is essentially a trade for bonds.
We are in enormous debt to China.
So, what is the outcome of that?
If you owe the bank $10K, the bank owns you. If you owe the bank 10 billion, you own the bank.
What kind of position do you think China is in with regards to us, Michael?
And, by the way, the China policy had to be opposite of the USSR policy because China is a different animal. They have incorporated Capitalistic mechanisms into their evil Communist regime.
Therefore, we have to go about bankrupting them in the opposite way to that which we did with Russia.
Just when you think you've finally met all of the 'tards on this earth, Google finds another one for me. BTW...Sarah Palin is a hot MILF, but the only time conservatives will ever see her in the WH, is on her knees.
8 comments:
The object of war is subjugation and takeover.
Will we ever say "No" to the Saudis? We haven't for two decades.
And what about the Chinese?
And them there is the United Nations (of Global Tyranny).
We lost our country, the Republic our fathers fought and died for, decades ago.
Michael,
China could not make war with us.
What a joke.
Your comment, by the way, had nothing to do with what I posted.
This post is not a rah rah pro-America post. You must not understand the reference to the Book of Revelation which is laid into the post.
China can not make war with the US. The US's military is so superior to that of every other military on Earth that it is as if we are a force of invading aliens from another galaxy when we hit other countries.
We could turn China into liquid glass quicker than they could blink. And almost every bit of technology China does have they either stole from us, or bought from us, and you know it.
You're so busy with your hatred what has happened to America that your thoughts are clouded by it.
By the way, this war with the ME is a proxy war being waged on the US by China and Russia. The reason they wage proxy war is PRECISELY BECAUSE THEY COULD NEVER BEAT US IN A REAL WAR.
I suspect there is a much larger plan afoot at the Pentagon and State, with regards to China, than you would ever guess.
Bush began his first term with China as his priority. Because of 9/11 it appeared that he changed priorities.
I don't think that is so.
The truly commanding objective - the underlying basis for budgets and troop deployments - is the containment of China. This objective governed White House planning during the administration's first seven months in office, only to be set aside by the perceived obligation to highlight anti-terrorism after
September 11, 2001; but now, despite President George W Bush's preoccupation with Iraq and Iran, the White House is also reemphasizing its paramount focus on China, risking a new Asian arms race with potentially catastrophic consequences.
Bush and his top aides entered the White House in early 2001 with a clear strategic objective: to resurrect the permanent-dominance doctrine spelled out in the Defense Planning Guidance (DPG) for fiscal years 1994-99, the first formal statement of US strategic goals in the post-Soviet era. According to the initial official draft of this document, as leaked to the press in early 1992, the primary aim of US strategy would be to bar the rise of any future competitor that might challenge America's overwhelming military superiority.
"Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival ... that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union," the document stated. Accordingly, "we [must] endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power".
http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2009/05/bolton-on-china-and-middle-east.html
So, put on your thinking cap, cuz you are a good thinker, and tell me why if the Bush Admin. wanted to contain China, we would buy unprecedented amounts of goods from China in what is essentially a trade for bonds.
We are in enormous debt to China.
So, what is the outcome of that?
If you owe the bank $10K, the bank owns you. If you owe the bank 10 billion, you own the bank.
What kind of position do you think China is in with regards to us, Michael?
And, by the way, the China policy had to be opposite of the USSR policy because China is a different animal. They have incorporated Capitalistic mechanisms into their evil Communist regime.
Therefore, we have to go about bankrupting them in the opposite way to that which we did with Russia.
Just when you think you've finally met all of the 'tards on this earth, Google finds another one for me. BTW...Sarah Palin is a hot MILF, but the only time conservatives will ever see her in the WH, is on her knees.
Why are you spending your time googling "Sarah Palin is a hot MILF".
You must be some kind of Tard.
And, of course, you have not used a shred of critical thinking in your analysis of us, or at least you have not demonstrated any.
If you want to make a point, back it up with a series of facts.
Post a Comment