It is time to cast aside all remaining doubt. President Obama is not trying to lead America forward to recovery, prosperity and strength. Quite the opposite, in fact.In September of last year, American Thinker published my article, Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis. Part of a series, it connected then-presidential candidate Barack Obama to individuals and organizations practicing a malevolent strategy for destroying our economy and our system of government. Since then, the story of that strategy has found its way across the blogosphere, onto the airwaves of radio stations across the country, the Glenn Beck television show, Bill O'Reilly, and now Mark Levin.The methodology is known as the Cloward-Piven Strategy, and we can all be grateful to David Horowitz and his Discover the Networks for originally exposing and explaining it to us. He describes it as:The strategy of forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. The "Cloward-Piven Strategy" seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven were two lifelong members of Democratic Socialists of America who taught sociology at Columbia University (Piven later went on to City University of New York). In a May 1966 Nation magazine article titled "The Weight of the Poor," they outlined their strategy, proposing to use grassroots radical organizations to push ever more strident demands for public services at all levels of government.The result, they predicted, would be "a profound financial and political crisis" that would unleash "powerful forces ... for major economic reform at the national level."They implemented the strategy by creating a succession of radical organizations, most notable among them the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), with the help of veteran organizer Wade Rathke. Their crowning achievement was the "Motor Voter" act, signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1993 with Cloward and Piven standing behind him.
As we now know, ACORN was one of the chief drivers of high-risk mortgage lending that eventually led to the financial crisis. But the Motor Voter law was another component of the strategy. It created vast vulnerabilities in our electoral system, which ACORN then exploited.ACORN's vote registration scandals throughout the U.S. are predictable fallout.The Motor Voter law has also been used to open another vulnerability in the system: the registration of vast numbers of illegal aliens, who then reliably vote Democrat. Herein lies the real reason Democrats are so anxious for open borders, security be damned.It should be clear to anyone with a mind and two eyes that this president and this Congress do not have our interests at heart. They are implementing this strategy on an unprecedented scale by flooding America with a tidal wave of poisonous initiatives, orders, regulations, and laws. As Rahm Emmanuel said, "A crisis is a terrible thing to waste."The real goal of "health care" legislation, the real goal of "cap-and-trade," and the real goal of the "stimulus" is to rip the guts out of our private economy and transfer wide swaths of it over to the government to control. Do not be deluded by the propaganda. These initiatives are vehicles for change. They are not goals in and of themselves except in their ability to deliver power. They and will make matters much worse, for that is their design.This time, in addition to overwhelming the government with demands for services, Obama and the Democrats are overwhelming political opposition to their plans with a flood of apocalyptic legislation. Their ultimate goal is to leave us so discouraged, demoralized, and exhausted that we throw our hands up in defeat. As Barney Frank said, "the middle class will be too distracted to fight."These people are our enemies. They don't use guns, yet, but they are just as dangerous, determined, and duplicitous as the communists we faced in the Cold War, Korea, Vietnam, and bush wars across the globe, and the Nazis we faced in World War II.It is time we fully internalized and digested this fact, with all its ugly ramifications. These people have violated countless laws and could be prosecuted, had we the political power. Not only are their policies unconstitutional, but deliberately so -- the goal being to make the Constitution irrelevant. Their spending is off the charts and will drive us into hyperinflation, but it could be rescinded, had we the political power. These policies are toxic, but they could be stopped and reversed, had we the political power. Their ideologies are poisonous, but they could be exposed for what they are, with long jail sentences as an object lesson, had we the political power.Every single citizen who cares about this country should be spending every minute of his or her spare time lobbying, organizing, writing, and planning. Fight every initiative they launch. It is all destructive. If we are to root out this evil, it is critical that in 2010 we elect competent, principled leaders willing to defend our Constitution and our country. Otherwise, the malevolent cabal that occupies the government today will become too entrenched.After that, all bets are off.
By the way, yesterday Damien and I were discussing the question of whether the Left is in fear of Islam or totally down with the Jihad.
Here's evidence for the latter:
American Marxists Demand End to Attacks on Muslims: "Progressives Need to Stand With Our Muslim Brothers and Sisters Against US Colonial Wars and Occupation"....
My opinion is as follows:
Leftists see Islam as a challenge to the Conservative Capitalist American system. And, they see anything which is a challenge to our system as being a good thing.
Additionally, both Leftists and Islam are ultimately totalitarian, so they are fellow travellers.
The totalitarian approach is more important to both groups than is the fact that they don't fully agree on policy.
It's about power, more than policy, in my opinion. Both the Left and Islam are in it to control people from the top down.
Gateway Pundit shows us how well Obama's strategy is working:
It should be obvious by now that Barack Obama’s disastrous Cloward-Piven economic policies were not meant to lift the economy.
After all, ask yourself, what would Obama be doing differently today if he intentionally set out to destroy the American economy?He’s tripled the national deficit in less than one year.
He’s increased the national debt to $12 Trillion.
And he’s nearly doubled the unemployment rate since the Bush years.
30 comments:
There never was any point in trying to pretend he was anything but what he is. A lot of people gave him nearly a year's worth of a "chance". We are paying dearly for it and may pay more dearly yet in this nightmare assault by Marxism and Islam.
Yes, I'm one of the fools who was reserving judgment, to some extent.
I did always suspect the Ayers/Wright side was stronger than the Pragmatic side, but I was hoping for the latter.
He proved he was purely Ayers/Wright when he appointed Cass Sunstein, Van Jones and John Holdren in rapid succession.
That's when Obama absolutely lost me.
And when he decided to bring KSM to New York, I decided he is actually committing Treason.
He belongs in a prison cell, not in the Oval Office.
Pastorius,
By the way, I left a comment on story about Marxists demanding that we stop attacking Muslims that you linked to. American Marxists Demand End to Attacks on Muslims: "Progressives Need to Stand With Our Muslim Brothers and Sisters Against US Colonial Wars and Occupation"....
Here's my comment in response to the story.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
So they think that "Progressives Need to Stand With Our Muslim Brothers and Sisters Against US Colonial Wars and Occupation?"
One should ask the people in the Workers World Party, which Muslim countries we are trying to colonize? The people of Just about every Islamic country who's government has been overthrown by America, have been allowed to set up their own constitutional governments with provisions that would abhor the average American, and would never allow to be made law In the US. That doesn't make sense if we are trying to conquer and colonize their lands. When was the last time a colonial power allowed the colonized people to set up their own government, while they were trying to conquer and subjugate them?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you think?
Pastorius,
As for the claim that Obama is trying to intentionally destroy our economy, it could just be that he doesn't know that much about economics.
Damien,
The Leftists who claim that we are colonizing the Islamic world are convinced we went to war with Iraq for oil. To them it's an open and shut case. There is no room for argument. They are convinced.
Barack Obama believes that too. That's why he goes around the world apologizing for us. He believes we have done something very wrong.
Barack Obama has proven with the appointments of people like Cass Sunstein, John Holdren and Van Jones that he is with Ayers and Jeremiah Wright; HE HATES AMERICA.
Why else would he appoint Sunstein, Holdren and Jones?
Damien, Pastorious,
I've been following the Workers' World Party's propaganda blitz. They not only defend terrorists whom just so happen to be Muslims, they also supported the Detroit Imam whom was killed by the FBI.
Look up the National Lawyers Guild's defense of the late "Imam". The NLG is widely known as a "legal" front of the Communist Party USA. It today still defends Lynne Stewart. Also, Workers' World Party members such as Sara Flounders in a sick display happily defends the terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan as "resistance".
Even when that same "resistance" imposes murdering local homosexuals, putting women in their place and also murdering their own people. How the hell are the Feds not already on their case? Could anyone who is sympathetic to their views literally copy what happen in Fort Hood?
Pastorius,
I agree with you that the left is totally convinced that the second Iraq war was a for oil. Something that in and of it self, is pretty baseless. Saddam used weapons of mass destruction on his own people and he acted in a highly suspicious manner, that gave us good reason to suspect that he was still developing WMDs even through he had signed a treaty specifically forbidding him from doing so. He wouldn't let weapons inspectors do their job, even through he was required to by the same treaty.
The most convincing argument I ever heard, for the idea that this was nothing but a war for oil was put forth, by one of my professors. She said that she suspected it was all for oil, because the American oil company Exon Mobile was the first company to operate one of Iraq's oil fields after the downfall of Saddam. That's hardly convincing, because it could just as easily be explained away as a coincidence, and therefor proves nothing. Also it ignores the fact that the US, wouldn't go out of its way to play favors with companies based in nations like France that had opposed the invasion.
But, even if the claim that we were in Iraq just for the oil, turned out to be true, you still couldn't call it colonizing, because we let the Iraq people write their own constitution and set up their own government. My point is the absurdity of the whole idea. The new government of Iraq will hardly be a puppet of the US, and in the long run, might even turn out to be hostile to American interests in the region.
On my first couple of read-throughs of Rand's ATLAS SHRUGGED (many, many moons ago...) I couldn't get my head around her concept of what she called the "looters" deliberately trying to bring down the civilization. I certainly never thought I'd ever see it, but this is what we are witnessing. We must stop making excuses for them and claiming they don't know what they are doing. They do. We had better.
Pastorius,
Actually I forgot about Bush's Oil connects, but the claim that his administration sent us off to war for oil is still just a conspiracy theory with no real evidence.
Damien,
I agree, it is definitely NOT colonizing. The idea is patently absurd. However, it IS what the Left believes. We have to admit that to ourselves.
You said: I agree with you that the left is totally convinced that the second Iraq war was a for oil. Something that in and of it self, is pretty baseless.
I say: It is utterly baseless. All one has to do to know the truth is do the math.
The Iraq War has cost us at least 500 billion dollars. The Iraqi oil industry does not produce nearly that in revenues; something like $30 billion a year.
We don't share in the profit of that $30 billion a year.
We don't get first dibs on the oil either. We line up and make deals just like everyone else.
Additionally, the Iraq war has not resulted in less expensive oil, but has instead resulted in MORE EXPENSIVE OIL.
Also, think about this: The USA is the only nation on Earth to refuse to do business with both Iran and Iraq at the same time. We have not bought oil from Iran since 1979. We did not buy oil from Iraq from 1991-2003. That means for 12 years we were refusing to do business with two of the largest oil-producers in the world.
Why?
Because we are the only nation who actually DOES pursue a somewhat moral policy when it comes to who we buy and sell to.
Other nations do not.
That is why we can't get a vote in the UN to do something about Sudan. We are blocked every time.
Revere Rides Again, and Pastorius,
I still see no evidence that Obama is trying to destroy our civilization. That said, I don't like most of Obama's policies. But, I don't think its a good idea for us to assume the worst about someone because we disagree with their polices. Even if those policies are destructive, it doesn't mean that he actually wants to destroy America. This is not excuses making. I can't get into Obama's head, but I doubt that he would want to destroy the nation that he is in charge of.
Damien,
You see no evidence? Ok, what is another explanation for appointing Van Jones to his de facto Cabinet?
Van Jones himself admitted he is a "rowdy black nationalist".
What does that mean? What would you think if Bush had started appointing White Nationalists to his Cabinet?
Remember, "God Damn Amerikkka."
Here you go, Damien:
http://eye-on-the-world.blogspot.com/2009/11/makes-you-wonder-whose-side-are-they-on.html
Pastorius,
If Bush appointed a white Nationalist it would definitively make me angry and upset that I had voted for him.
That's an interesting article, by the way. I haven't read much of it yet.
Maybe I should clarify; when I say Obama wants to destroy our nation, what I mean is he is attacking the very institutions and ideas which make us what we are. He is a Leftist and an Islam-sympathizer. Both paradigms are antithetical to what the United States of America is all about.
If Obama is successful in pushing through ObamaCare, then the government will control 48% of the American economy. That is Communism.
If Obama pushes through Cap and Trade, the coal industry will be destroyed. We get more than 50% of our energy from coal.
What do you think the effect of destroying the coal industry would be?
A Green Utopia?
Or the USA as a third-world nation.
Soon, when I have a couple of hours, I am going to post a four page excerpt from Bruce Bawer's book While Europe Slept.
The excerpt is Bawer's testimony of what it was like to be in both West Germany and East Germany in the days after the Wall was torn down.
It is necessary to post this, because people don't seem to realize what Communism/Socialism does to the human spirit.
If Obama gets away with what he wants to do, he will destroy our country.
Pastorius,
Many of Obama's policies are counter to America's founding principals and has done a lot to weaken us, weather he realizes it or not, and I definitively don't support socialism.
Damien,
You will probably remember that I used to simply say Obama's policies are counter to the American Tradition.
My criticism of his policy has become more extreme as his extremity is revealed.
There was no excuse for the Van Jones appointment. That was an abomination.
Pastorius,
What makes you think I'm trying to excuse Obama's decision to appoint Van Jones?
I would have to answer your question with a question.
How can you say Obama is not trying to destroy America when he will appoint an outright, admitted RACIST to his de facto Cabinet?
Remember, "God Damn Amerikkka."
Ayers - unrepentant terrorist "I wish I would have done more".
Van Jones "rowdy black nationalist"
Connect the dots.
What do you think is in Obama's head?
Obama is revealing his extremities?!?!?
Now that's just sick. . .
:)
Did I write that?
LOL
Wtf is wrong with me?
Sometimes it's hard to think straight when you are as, ahem, extreme as I.
You hard right wing extremist being watched by Nappy and her Happy crew you. . .
I don't even want to think about it, man.
Post a Comment