There are many things on the World Wide Web that are not suitable for public viewing but that should be required viewing for journalists and political figures to alert them to the horrors that exist in some parts of the world. This should not be to incite but rather to rinse away their naïveté in dealing with a hostile culture and our potential enemies.
It is apparent that the mainstream media has no interest in covering stories that shed an unfavorable side of Islam and, frankly, this smacks of cowardice.
The elite will instead claim that the “vast majority” of Muslims are peace-loving and are just as horrified at the acts of a small number of radical terrorists. That may very well be true but even a fraction of a billion is a very large number and that number is growing and gaining influence around the world thanks to the stupidity and cowardice of what should be called the “lamestream” press and those in our government today.
While I like the idea behind Ms. Colon's article here (and congrats to Breitbart on his new site Big Journalism), the truth is, these facts about the Islamic world, these truths, these images SHOULD INCITE us.
They should incite us to want to kill.
Not to kill the next Muslim you see. But, to be sure, when a just human being is confronted with great injustice, he ought to be incited to kill the perpetrators of the injustice.
For instance, who among us would not like to have stood next to Adolf Hitler and choked the fucking life out of him?
And, this stuff about perhaps it being true that only a minority of Muslims are in agreement with Jihadism. That's crap. Maybe only a minority in the West. MAYBE.
But, in the Muslim world, it is the mainstream. That's why Jihadism and Jew-hatred and America-hatred is on their TV. That's why they elect Sharia-governments to represent them. That's why Jihadism is taught in their schools, their universities.
Enough of the equivocating language. It makes you look silly. Worse than silly.
Clearly, we do not know which Muslims among us support this kind of extremism. So, at this time it is impossible to know who to kill. But, one day, something will happen that will smoke them out, and then, it will be up to the government to kill them.
And, this is why not only should we be incited, but we ought to incite right back. We ought to incite Muslims, because it will smoke out the extremists. And, when the extremists are smoked out, then the ones who attempt to stand in the awkward middle will be left to decide what to do. They will have to make a decision.
These things have to happen. The time for equivocation has long since passed. Jihadism, Sharia, the stoning of gays, apostates, and adulterers, the incitement to genocide of Jews and Infidels, these are not acceptable. And, that should be stated in the most extreme of terms.
11 comments:
Fortunately most Muslim countries are not democracies. If they were democracies, Shariah law would be the law of the land everywhere and almost every government would be entirely hostile to the West. If Egypt had free elections, for example, there would be a good chance that the Muslim Brotherhood would be running the government. The Muslim Brotherhood, who boasts Ayman Al-Zawahiri as one of their top alumni, is banned under Mubarak's government and their supporters are routinely beaten and arrested.
Even in Muslim countries where Sharia is not the law of the land, it is extremely pervasive, as we saw the other day, when in Egypt, a bunch of Muslims killed Christian worshipers in church on Christmas.
Pastorius,
Your right Sharia and all it stands for needs to be condemn in clear cut terms. No beating around the bush.
And these guy certainly are not our friends.
pastorius is dead on and anyone with a brain who isnt completely distracted by the day to day life they have to get through knows something is up.
even people who dont pay attention have a gut feeling something is building.
the bottom line is two ways of life are coming to blows.
western judeochristian/modern secular and on the other side islamism and the ummah.
the fact of the matter is they cannot inhabit the same space. its one or the other and eventually that will become apparent to even the sleepiest of us.
O/T
..... .. evil
..... .. sick
..... .. dangerous
..... .. deadly patient
..... .. out to destroy human freedom
..... .. an ideology of war
..... .. crafted to deceive its intended victims
..... .. growing ever more extreme
..... .. a global cancer
..... .. not at all what most people imagine
..... .. a test
..... .. going to be destroyed
(you know, just helping out google
with its pathetic little oversight)
Answer in the form of a question;
what is "Islam is"?
Remember those insipid bus ads that blandly assert:
".... .. the Answer"
Well I rather like them now that I've taken a few moments to ponder the implied QUESTION:
"What should free men and women oppose with every fiber of thir being?"
Yeah, exactly. Thanks for that.
Anonymous,
And sadly, to some extent, we have to include the writer of this piece, Andrea Colon, in the ranks of cowards. She just couldn't quite spell out the truth, hard as she was trying.
It's just too politically incorrect.
Assuming the MSM even WANTED to cover this in the way it should be covered .. they would have to have the attitude that the American people would be the recipient of fright delivered by them.
That is a goal reserved only for that most heinous and villainous group of evildoers on earth ..
REPUBLICANS
TEA PARTY FRINGE
Those groups should frighten americans, not muslims who feel we are godless beer sucking fornicators
Post a Comment