Never Again and Again
and Again and Again

click.jpg

Thursday, January 28, 2010

The State of the Union? Ask the Voters in Massachusetts

boring_and_carter.jpgIn an address punctuated by a crazy call for increased drilling (Sarah Palin anyone?) I was struck, before being put into a sleep deep enough for a root canal, by a wonder that if George Soros was taking a hike on this guy, and Hillary was busy doing her hair, WHAT WAS NEXT?


It's hard to fathom he could be done.


I can't accept that.


But amid his calls to fight, fight, fight prior to this speech, and his stunningly inaccurate statement on the recent SCOTUS decision and demagogic smear of the justices AT SOTU, .. he just seemed deflated before the botoxed semi rictus of Pelosi's smile and the vapid dentifriced ketamine like gaze of Biden.


But he cannot be all done.


Can he? Not buying it.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Bookmark and Share
posted by Epaminondas at permanent link#

11 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I couldn't even watch it. I decided to watch Joy Behar gossip and denegrate conservatives, instead, knowing that I could read about it later.

Today, reports that we are paying off the Taliban! Infidel tax? (I refuse to use their words. It only adds to world Islmatization. So it is not "j**za," it is infidel tax. It is not a "h*j*b," it is a headscarf, got it? We should not use their words!!! Also pretty disturbed about the US Air Flight where a woman reports suspicious activity only to be ignored. I can't handle what I'm reading on a daily basis. Couldn't even look at him last night. How did he get there?

Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:42:00 pm  
Blogger Pastorius said...

The advantage to using words like Jizya and hijab is that it helps to educate dhimmis and ignorant Infidels.

If we do not point out the Islamic root of these ideas, the roots in the Krayon and the Hadith, then our dhimmis and ignorant Infidels will never learn.

Friday, January 29, 2010 1:51:00 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, gotta disagree with you Pastorius. If we use their words, they become part of the American lexicon. Not good. I don't speak Islam.

Instead, I will say "an Islamic tax charged to non-Muslims for being infidels, or other second-class citizens." Or, "an Islamic head scarf, or Islamic full-body shroud used to demean and denegrate the female gender and deny her identity." Or, "Islamic un-holy war." Or, "Islamic un-holy book." Or, ...

By qualifiying the American word with the term Islamic we do as you say, point out the root of these very sick ideas, without allowing their words to become a part of the American lexicon.

I'm very determined about this. I do not, will not speak Islam. I spit on Islam and anything Islamic. Big gooey wad of spit on Islam. Shame to Islam. I probably shouldn't use the word Islam, but instead that "sick, violent, mysogynistic, misanthropic, anachronistic, barbarian relio-political ideology of ethnic supremacy that takes the humanity out of human beings."

"Icklam," might be a shorter way of saying it? Maybe "sicklam?" Yeah, that's a really good one, says it all, "sicklam."

Friday, January 29, 2010 4:08:00 pm  
Blogger Pastorius said...

I see your point.

If you write a short piece on your idea, I'll post it here.

I think it is an idea worth discussing.

Friday, January 29, 2010 4:14:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you. I think it's an important topic to get out there.

I'll try and work on it.

Thanks.

Glen at TROP is also giving my agurment some thought. Yes, we should all think seriously about their terminology.

How would I submit any essay to you? I've looked quickly, but see no way of getting it you without replying to a post? I respect your privacy and would never want to do anything to compromise the wonderful work you and Paul:) are doing. He's Paul right? You're John? I am the Walrus:)

Friday, January 29, 2010 5:13:00 pm  
Blogger Pastorius said...

Yeah, I'm John, cuz I'm the one with the Asian wife.

;-)

You can email me at

cuanasblog@yahoo.com

Friday, January 29, 2010 7:23:00 pm  
Blogger Pastorius said...

By the way, that's interesting that you may be changing the minds of two guys who blog on this subject every freaking day of their lives.

You may really be on to something.

If it was just me, that would be one thing.

Problem we have here is this whole blog is predicated on taking their terminology and shoving it back in their faces. We are called "Infidel" Bloggers Alliance, after all.

Maybe we should change our name to Crusaders Alliance.

Reliapundit wrote to me last night and suggested we start calling ourselves "Crew Satyrs."

LOL

sa·tyr (str, str)
n.
1. often Satyr Greek Mythology A woodland creature depicted as having the pointed ears, legs, and short horns of a goat and a fondness for unrestrained revelry.
2. A licentious man; a lecher.

Friday, January 29, 2010 7:28:00 pm  
Blogger midnight rider said...

Well, we certainly fit # 2.

Friday, January 29, 2010 8:39:00 pm  
Blogger Pastorius said...

I do like the name.

I don't think we ought to rebrand ourselves at this point.

;-)

Friday, January 29, 2010 8:41:00 pm  
Blogger midnight rider said...

No, no rebranding. Infidel is not an Islam word. We used it to describe them during the Crusades themselves.

By the way, anon. you can also send stuff to me (Paul) (Saul?) at hobotramp@live.com . Send your submissions to us both, one of us will see it.

Friday, January 29, 2010 8:47:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10/4. I will try and work on getting my thoughts into a coherent argument. I definitely don't like the word creep, it's part of the whole shitlamization process, imo.

Also, I like Infidel Blogger's Alliance and agree that infidel is not an Islamic term.

Friday, January 29, 2010 10:37:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home