Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Talk of Repeal is absurd right now... we need a prez, about 50 more congressmen, and 19 more senators

CMON REPUBS, get with it.pelosi_eats.jpg


There are AT LEAST TWO marathons to win before repeal talk is realistic.

The message should be unified around how URGENT it is for Americans to BECOME CONSTITUTIONALLY INSPIRED to vote republican, and achieve the critical mass necessary to accomplish what needs to be done OR UNDONE.


BEFORE ENOUGH OTHERS BECOME HOOKED ON HEROINIZED GOVT SERVICES INJECTED BY THEIR CARDIOLOGISTS, ONCOLOGISTS, NEUROLOGISTS AND PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS


Those who wish for repeal should be working tirelessly not for repeal but for those whose election will achieve those ends.


That is a very different thing.


STFU McCain, et al.


TALK ABOUT THE ELECTION.


REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


8 comments:

Always On Watch said...

Those who wish for repeal should be working tirelessly not for repeal but for those whose election will achieve those ends.


That is a very different thing.


I concur.

WE THE PEOPLE are enraged right now. But rage won't accomplish anything in and of itself.

IMO, if violence breaks out, there we be no 2010 elections. Instead, there will be martial law.

BHO and the Dems are taking this passing of health care reform as just the first step. Next: immigration and Cap and Trade.

Epaminondas said...

I know many feel this way..."IMO, if violence breaks out, there we be no 2010 elections. Instead, there will be martial law." .. but I just cannot accept it.

I believe it would lead within months to guerrilla and civil war in the USA and perhaps a division of the republic

Pastorius said...

Yeah, I agree.

You know, I'm a lifelong registered Democrat. My ideas have, indeed, changed over the years. I used to think Republicans were stupid. And then I started (during the Bush years) to appreciate Republicans.

Now, quite frankly, I'm back to thinking they are stupid.

The idea of working on a repeal the bill movement when you couldn't even defeat the bill the first time is a desperate maneuver bordering on retarded.

The John McCain nomination was the result of the same absolute tone-deafness.

I hate the fucking Republican Party.

The only thing I hate worse, at this point, is the fucking Democratic Party.

Anonymous said...

I am sorry, but that made me laugh, Pastorius.

But to be fair, the McCain nomination was, at least in part, due to the (admittedly idiotic) "open primary" system.

One way, I think, to improve the quality of candidates, is to close the damn primaries. Then one has to register to vote and probably does keep the "independents" from picking the Repub nominees.

Ro

Pastorius said...

Ro,
You're right that the open primary system contributed to the McCain nomination, but if the Party were actually visionary, they would have been able to overcome that.

They did not put up a single viable candidate, in my opinion.

Epaminondas said...

"They did not put up a single viable candidate, in my opinion."

Looking back, it was Romney.
On the day that Lehman went down, it became quite obvious as McCain suspended the campaign ..it was Romney.

Of course that was months and months after the issue was decided.

Pastorius said...

I look at it from a Markteting standpoint, not from a rationality standpoint. Romney was not marketable.

He is not the story America wants to tell itself.

Obama was.

The Democrats figured that out. The Republicans are tone-deaf.

Epaminondas said...

From a marketing standpoint that's correct.
But I think more than that, it was Obama's being more NOT BUSH than McCain was.

Now, it appears that the Republicans must gravitate towards a NOT OBAMA, who has a good story. But it must be someone who we can be sure can PERFORM in office.

After all, Obama is easily young enough to lose in 2012, and rehabilitate and reinvent himself again and run after the next fiasco on the other side, especially given the way the media HATES anything near or right of center