Friday, June 11, 2010

Sources: Obama Administration to Support Anti-Israel Resolution at UN Next Week

From the Weekly Standard:

THE WEEKLY STANDARD has learned that senior Obama administration officials have been telling foreign governments that the administration intends to support an effort next week at the United Nations to set up an independent commission, under UN auspices, to investigate Israel's behavior in the Gaza flotilla incident.

The White House has apparently shrugged off concerns from elsewhere in the U.S. government that a) this is an extraordinary singling out of Israel, since all kinds of much worse incidents happen around the world without spurring UN investigations; b) that the investigation will be one-sided, focusing entirely on Israeli behavior and not on Turkey or on Hamas; and c) that this sets a terrible precedent for outside investigations of incidents involving U.S. troops or intelligence operatives as we conduct our own war on terror.

While UN Ambassador Susan Rice is reported to have played an important role in pushing for U.S. support of a UN investigation, the decision is, one official stressed, of course the president's. 
Go read the whole thing.

Epaminondas adds: Gee I am just so shocked. (here is a quote from Samantha Power, Obama Foreign Policy Advisor, on how to solve the Israel problem)
"What we don’t need is some kind of early warning mechanism there, what we need is a willingness to put something on the line in helping the situation. Putting something on the line might mean alienating a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import; it may more crucially mean sacrificing—or investing, I think, more than sacrificing—billions of dollars, not in servicing Israel’s military, but actually investing in the new state of Palestine, in investing the billions of dollars it would probably take, also, to support what will have to be a mammoth protection force, not of the old Rwanda kind, but a meaningful military presence. Because it seems to me at this stage (and this is true of actual genocides as well, and not just major human rights abuses, which were seen there), you have to go in as if you’re serious, you have to put something on the line."

3 comments:

Epaminondas said...

Gee I am just so shocked.

"What we don’t need is some kind of early warning mechanism there, what we need is a willingness to put something on the line in helping the situation. Putting something on the line might mean alienating a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import; it may more crucially mean sacrificing—or investing, I think, more than sacrificing—billions of dollars, not in servicing Israel’s military, but actually investing in the new state of Palestine, in investing the billions of dollars it would probably take, also, to support what will have to be a mammoth protection force, not of the old Rwanda kind, but a meaningful military presence. Because it seems to me at this stage (and this is true of actual genocides as well, and not just major human rights abuses, which were seen there), you have to go in as if you’re serious, you have to put something on the line."

Samantha Power

Total said...

So... has the UN done anything about the DPRK's unprovoked sinking and murder of the Cheonan and its sailors (which, by the way, happened all the way back in March)? Yeah, I thought so.

Pastorius said...

The Turks are not the chosen people of God, so people do not find anything wrong with them.

The fight against the Jews is a spiritual war. No matter how non-spiritual a person may be, no matter how rational a person may be, one has to admit there is no rational explanation for the world's obsessive hatred of the Jews over the past few thousand years. It is unrelenting, and it is always evidence of a disordered mind, or of chaos below the surface in a society on the edge of collapse.