Dear Mr. Holder,
Aren't you supposed to be protecting the rights of THE people, not just YOUR people?
Regards,
We THE People
Politico:
Eric Holder: Black Panther case focus demeans 'my people'
Attorney General Eric Holder finally got fed up Tuesday with claims that the Justice Department went easy in a voting rights case against members of the New Black Panther Party because they are African American.
Holder's frustration over the criticism became evident during a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing as Rep. John Culberson (R-Texas) accused the Justice Department of failing to cooperate with a Civil Rights Commission investigation into the handling of the 2008 incident in which Black Panthers in intimidating outfits and wielding a club stood outside a polling place in Philadelphia.
The Attorney General seemed to take personal offense at a comment Culberson read in which former Democratic activist Bartle Bull called the incident the most serious act of voter intimidation he had witnessed in his career.
"Think about that," Holder said. "When you compare what people endured in the South in the 60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, to compare what people subjected to that with what happened in Philadelphia, which was inappropriate....to describe it in those terms I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line for my people," said Holder, who is black.
Holder noted that his late sister-in-law, Vivian Malone Jones, helped integrate the University of Alabama.
"To compare that kind of courage, that kind of action, to say some Black Panther incident is of greater concern to us, historiclally, I think just flies in the face of history," Holder said with evident exasperation.
In a series of questions and comments earlier in the hearing, Culberson insisted that race had infected the decision-making process. "There’s clearly overwhelming evidence that your Department of Justice refuses to protect the rights of anybody other than African-Americans to vote," the Texas Republican said. "There's a double standard here."
"This Department of Justice does not enforce the law on the basis of race," Holder insisted.
Rep. Chakah Fattah, a Democrat from Philadelphia, said the Black Panthers "should not have been there." But he said the GOP was making too much out of a fleeting incident involving a couple of people.
"The most unethical thing a person can do is make allegations based on absolutely nothing," Fattah said. "The only issue of race is singling out this particular decision...That this rises to national significance is boguson its face."
4 comments:
He's right that the scope of the Voter Intimidation was not as large as in the South in the 60's.
to my knowledge, there was not large-scale organized voter intimidation of whites in Philadelphia or anywhere else in the country.
I'm sure Bartle Bull would agree with that, as would, I believe, Culbertson.
No one has asserted there was.
The point here is, that was a blatant act of Voter Intimidation, and that is a Federal Crime, and the Attorney General of the United States chose to look the other way, after a Conviction.
Now, he is playing the race card to try to shut people up.
Mr. Holder needs to learn the simple truth that having been personally oppressed does not make one immune from criticism on other matters.
And that was my point in posting this, he's playing the race card. I agree this was nothing like the south, but DoJ shoul;d not be looking the other way, either. Because give them an inch. . .
Yeah, I was just responding to the shit Holder said in the article. He makes a good point there. The Jim Crow crap was a big deal.
Doesn't mean white people have to suffer for it in 2008 when they want to vote.
Not all whites supported Jim Crow, but Jim Crow was large in scope, and stretched beyond mere law, right?
Post a Comment