Friday, March 25, 2011

Lord Help Us!

6 comments:

Always On Watch said...

"At the end of the day, when we say 'innocent people', we mean Muslims."

It's the us-vs-them mentality pervasive in Islam. Indeed, that mentality is the heart of Islam.

The West hasn't caught onto the reality of differing definitions.

abdooss said...

P,
Do you know Veena Malik?

She is our newest fighter against the Mullah!

(Just don't vote her as "Infidel Babe of the Week" or all will be lost)

Pastorius said...

Yeah, we posted on her the other day:

http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2011/03/pakistani-actress-to-mullah-there-are.html

She is hot, isn't she?

By the way, Abdoos, in the future, I would point to this post in the case of anyone attacking you, and claiming you are not more on our side than not.

I think I understand where you are coming from. But, you often mince words and disagree with us over seemingly unimportant points, and such disagreements make the other commenters distrust you.

But, that's ok, as long as you can handle it.

Maybe you're right. Maybe we should make her Infidel Babe of the Week.

abdooss said...

P,
You (and Dag) understand me better than the rest (the others will take offence at my attempts to pulling your legs).. and only you believe we can 'agree to disagree' !

Your side? Remember that I am a chess player? I believe in this 'match' (especially in the Middle East), it should be a 'draw' - with neither side winning nor losing. But if the deviant Mullahs have to go, so be it!

abdooss said...

P,
Not all Mullahs advocate terrorism and Jihad to mean killing all infidels only.

Extremists, moderate and .. you name it.

Pastorius said...

Abdoos,
You're the one who wrote: if the deviant Mullahs have to go, so be it!

Here's what needs to be done away with entirely,

1) stoning gays, apostates and adulterers to death,

2) any legal force or movement towards a social system in which women or non-Muslims are "second-class citizens"

3) any preaching of Jihad against the Infidel