Wednesday, March 09, 2011

Now What?

If it is definitely proven that the very ideology of Islam (caliphate, jihad, shari'a) is inherently violent, where does the West go from there? Ibrahim Hooper states in this essay:
The West, alarmingly, does not have a political history or language to justify an offensive against an ideological foe....

[...]

Now that Americans are becoming familiar with the perpetual and determined nature of its enemy — jihad, sharia, and the caliphate have a 1400-year legacy — who will take it to the next level by, not just highlighting the threat, but openly and boldly suggesting what steps the West needs to take to combat it, now and for the long haul? Where do you go from there?
We can speak the truth until our faces turn blue, but all that speaking is not action to curb the rise of the caliphate and shari'a law.

If all the present turmoil in the Middle East serves to establish some sort of caliphate, what will the West have to do to survive?

Mr. Ibrahim rightly points out in his essay:
A caliphate represents a permanent, ideological enemy, not a temporal enemy that can be bought or pacified through diplomacy or concessions -- economic or otherwise....

[...]

A caliphate is precisely what Islamists around the world are feverishly seeking to establish — before people realize what it represents and try to prevent it. Without active, preemptive measures, it is only a matter of time before they succeed....
Everything that I can think of to counter such a caliphate are Draconian solutions. Perhaps others here at IBA have more optimistic ideas on this topic.

1 comment:

Ray Boyd said...

"Everything that I can think of to counter such a caliphate are Draconian solutions. Perhaps others here at IBA have more optimistic ideas on this topic."

Sorry, can't be optimistic about this. Draconian is the ONLY solution and because our governments will never be draconian we are all doomed to become dhimmies.

On a similar note why is everybody rooting for the Libyan rebels when they constantly shout Allahah Akbar which means that if they were to win the civil war - for that is what it is - then certainly islamism will reign.

It takes a secular dictator to keep islamism down even if the people have restricted freedoms because as sure as eggs is eggs they will have even fewer freedoms under an islamic dictatorship.

I'm rooting for Gaddafi to win for the above reasons.