Saturday, March 19, 2011

This is why so many states are moving to ban Shariah in America
First it's this, something relatively minor (a dispute between trustees of an Islamic Center), then it's on to clash-of-civilization type cases.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

American Rose:

I'm sorry try-nono.com, but are you stupid? What is to understand about a supremacist religio-political ideology that is totalitarian? Really. You think we should try and understand someone who wants to chop your hand off for stealing or who says I am a lesser person than you because I am a woman? We did not fight a war of independence to have to understand some foreign element antagonistic to our way of life and our civil freedoms. Anyone who comes here, should adapt to our system of governance, not the other way around. You must not know much about pisslam?

Pastorius said...

AR,
I decided to erase his comment because I think his only purpose in being here was to promote his site.

Damien said...

Pastorius,

I won't hold my brief, but I hope people like Berry Lin, Morris Dees start to listen to us now.

Anonymous said...

comment worth repeating from WeazelZippers:
"This case smells to high heaven: it’s between members of an ‘islamic education center’ (mosque) and could have been settled among themselves as stated in the court document. BUT (here’s the stench of rat in this): they chose to go to a US Court IN ORDER TO GET THE COURT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE VALIDITY OF SHARIA LAW AS THE SOURCE OF ‘ARBITRATION’ BETWEEN MOSLEMS AND THEREFORE AS A FORM OF LEGAL DEVICE IN THE US.

This ‘case’ is a set-up, I suspect, as a first step to get Sharia validated by a US court for arbitration purposes and then to move into ‘domestic’ cases and on, inexorably, to Sharia as parallel jurisprudence and then as a real threat AS MOSLEM NUMBERS INCREASE due to ‘immigration,’ ‘refugees’ (quite a few countries as candidates in the ME ‘crisis’ of the moment), ‘student visas’ and ‘cultural and professional exchange of professionals’ (doctors, ‘educators,’ ‘religious leaders’ (i.e., imams).

These two parties in this case are, I suspect, on the same side: Islam’s side and, once again, Moslems are using our own legal system to destroy us. Either that judge is a dhimmi (dimwit), a Left-activist, or has been well-paid."


The judge broke his oath by playing their game and lending judicial legitimacy to shariah. Time for Floridians and Americans in general to get angry and RECALL any judge like this one that jeopardizes our constitution.

Pastorius said...

The Judge broke his oath ...

INDEED.

Damien, the question is, are people like Morris Dees really protectors of Human Rights, or are they just reflexively against what they see as the American Power Structure?

Anonymous said...

Anon AR:

Sheepish grin. A hair removal company? I had just finished reading the story at WZ and was pretty inflamed. Now I feel foolish and inflamed:) Maybe it's time for bed?