Tuesday, May 10, 2011

does anyone else find obamas choices in people to be alarming and radical? but whitewashed as the new norm by the msm

Obama’s Director for Counter Terrorism advocates world leaders should consider the possibility of “mass genocide” to reduce our world’s population to a more “sustainable level commensurate with our Earth’s resources.”

this story is so far quite unsubstantiated, although it does fit the tenor of this white house.

10 May

Audrey Tomason: Situation Room Mystery Woman

P050111PS-0210

There’s fleetingly little information about the woman standing just feet from the president in what has become an iconic photo of the Situation Room during the raid on Osama bin Laden.


Audrey Tomason: Situation Room Mystery Woman

“Obama’s Director for Counter Terrorism – Audry Tomason definitely an evil entity


Ms Tomason further argues in her “Apocalypse Equation” thesis that since the collapse of civilization as we know it is “inevitable,” world leaders should consider the possibility of “mass genocide” to reduce our world’s population to a more “sustainable level commensurate with our Earth’s resources.”

The chilling genocidal scenario envisioned by Ms Tomason begins with a “limited nuclear conflict” targeted at major population centers, but designed to limit the fallout of radiation. Next would be the release of toxic chemical and biological agents she suggests could be blamed on “terrorist entities” to be followed by forced mass migration of populations to more “sustainable living environments.”

Daniel Stone is Newsweek’s White House correspondent. He also covers national energy and environmental policy.
COMMENTS
Obama’s Director for Counter Terrorism – Audry Tomason definitely an evil entity
According to Ms Tomason’s “Apocalypse Equation” the “sustainable population” of our world can only be 1.5 billion human beings, as compared to the United Nations estimate of 7 billion we will reach on October 31st of this year, and the even worse figure of 10 billion estimated by 2100.
Ms Tomason argues in her thesis that our world’s population has been “artificially inflated” for the past nearly 100 years by a “non-sustainable” petrochemical and fossil fuel based global economy that if left “unchecked” could very well destroy all life on Earth, not just human beings.
Ms Tomason states in her thesis that any population suffering an economic collapse and reverting to “Basic Needs” will be “ungovernable” and pose “tremendous risks” to the state leading to “wholesale breakdown of law and order.”
Ms Tomason further argues in her “Apocalypse Equation” thesis that since the collapse of civilization as we know it is “inevitable,” world leaders should consider the possibility of “mass genocide” to reduce our world’s population to a more “sustainable level commensurate with our Earth’s resources.”
The chilling genocidal scenario envisioned by Ms Tomason begins with a “limited nuclear conflict” targeted at major population centers, but designed to limit the fallout of radiation. Next would be the release of toxic chemical and biological agents she suggests could be blamed on “terrorist entities” to be followed by forced mass migration of populations to more “sustainable living environments.”
Ms Tomason envisions these “sustainable living environments” as being large population centers with mass transit systems where no personal vehicles would be allowed and the rural areas would be completely depopulated except for government run agricultural “systems.”
Prior to the initiation of these apocalyptic events Ms Tomason argues for the establishment of government run and protected “concentration camps” where “persons of worth” can be protected while the masses of their fellow citizens die by the millions and billions. Those deemed “persons of worth” would include scientists, doctors, technical specialist, etc.

observing the fact obama is deeply connected to bill ayers who advocated mass genocide and the roots of this are disturbing at best showing just another example of how radical this presidency is.


17 comments:

Unknown said...

Just give him a second term and you'll know.In the coming weeks(Days) the use of unmanned drones in US skies will be aproved,how long before 'enemies of the state' are taken out?

SamenoKami said...

I say we start with her worthless ass and add the rest of her fellow-travelers. It would definitely make the world a better place to live.

Anonymous said...

the problem is,

we allowed an unvetted man to become president.

that unvetted man, is a radical who travels with radicals.

the radicals have substituted moral relativism and suedo education from the left wing bubble world for real morals and a traditional religious framework in their life.

in other words they have substituted leftist echo chamber gobldygook about the end of the world, along with what they must do to hurry that along to create their distopean paradise on earth, for the word of god

so you end up with evil people who discuss killing you and all of your families like they would discuss taking out the garbage.

its all relative to them, its all normal, its "going to have to be done anyway" according to them... of course they came up with the doomsday scenerio from their own fevered minds and then pointed to that as evidence to start making plans like this.....

Pastorius said...

Hi Rumcrook,
This is extremely frightening, if true.

However, I have looked and I can find no reasonable source on this story.

Everything links back to websites who promote aliens taking over the Earth, and there is no source on those sites.

One of the primary sites featuring this story is actually called TinFoilPalace.

Epaminondas said...

That woman is Barbie Tickler, Obama personal trainer and aromatherapy guru

Epaminondas said...

From the LEFT (DAILY BEAST):
Audrey Tomason: Situation Room Mystery Woman
by Daniel Stone

There's fleetingly little information about the woman standing just feet from the president in what has become an iconic photo of the Situation Room during the raid on Osama bin Laden. Daniel Stone investigates Audrey Tomason's sparse record. Plus: full coverage of Osama bin Laden's death.
The photo has been seen on front pages around the world: President Obama in the White House Situation Room watching the Osama bin Laden raid with the most recognizable faces in American government and counterterrorism.
Except one.
Who's the woman peeking her head from the back? A White House caption for the photo identifies her as Audrey Tomason with title "Director for Counterterrorism." But in a room full of oft-cited and quoted people, there's fleetingly little published information about who she is or what she does for the administration.

The presence of Tomason is notable for a few reasons. Next to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, she's the only other woman pictured in the testosterone-filled room. And she appears to be the only person under 40. But what matters most is that she is standing just a few feet from the president, who is otherwise surrounded by his closest advisers, as they watch one of the country's highest-stakes operations in decades as it occurs in real time.
When The Daily Beast asked the White House press office about Tomason, an official said she worked with the National Security Council, a White House agency closely involved with the intelligence that led to bin Laden. The official intimated that the White House generally doesn't discuss personnel at any of the government's covert or intelligence agencies. Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for the NSC, confirmed she worked with the agency. When asked why she had never been identified or mentioned before, Vietor responded "Well, we've never killed bin Laden before."
"There are trace details floating around the Internet about Tomason; trying to figure out who she is has become a sort of Web parlor game."She is said to have gone to Tufts University and earned her masters at Harvard's Kennedy School. (Harvard and Tufts did not immediately respond to inquiries but we'll update the story as soon as we hear back.) One corner of the Internet suggests she is 34, but the number couldn't be confirmed. She also didn't appear to be active on any major social networks. When the Beast tried to reach her Tuesday afternoon at her office, no one answered the phone.
The image shows a white-knuckle moment: a resolute and stone-faced President Obama and a level of organization and discipline among his team. But could it have outed a sensitive national security employee? "You can make a reasonable deduction that she’s a member of the intelligence community," says Michael Barrett, a national security expert and principal at strategy firm Diligent Innovations. "Is that a story [the White House] wants to put out there in public? The fact that we can see her face could potentially jeopardize her career."
Daniel Stone is Newsweek's White House correspondent. He also covers national energy and environmental policy.

Unknown said...

Perhaps indirectly related:

http://www.shtfplan.com/emergency-preparedness/shadow-government-bunkers-security-heightened-at-underground-storage-facilities_05092011

Epaminondas said...

Not buying that far, Will.

However, please visit my fuhrerbunker here

Plenty of room for all IBA contributors.

And BTW we launch on warning

Unknown said...

Nice ,really nice.I guess there will be no network signal there? :)

Anonymous said...

I can amend it read that it is so far quite unsubstantiated, although it does fit the tenor of this white house.

Pastorius said...

It's not that different from John Holdren. That's for sure.

Anonymous said...

here's the thing P,

just like a good joke, to be believable their has to be either plausability or an element of the truth,


so many leftards in the obama whitehouse seceretly crave total power over us barbarian class, like when they got all misty eyed over china's being able to rule as they see fit, or admiring moa, the greatest mass murderer in the 20th century,

or more distantly but only by a hair, ayers who I beleive was a good frienfd of zero, who did advocate executing millions of americans to remake our society.

Pastorius said...

I hope you understand I am not disagreeing with your premise.

Pastorius said...

Let me be clear, however; on one of the sites that reported this story, reported it as if their had been a conversation within the White House, between Thomason and another person (I do not remember who now) about the possibility of unleashing this "Apocalypse Equation" in the aftermath of the Bin Laden killing.

that is absurd.

I have not been able to find Thomason's Apocalypse thesis online. Nor have I been able to find any corroboration that she ever said anything of the like.

This is not the case with Holdren, whose words are out there for everyone to see, and whose words are no less chilling.

The question I have in my mind about Thomason's supposed thesis, if it exists, is this:

Is it Prescriptive, or Descriptive?

If it is a description of a possible scenario which she fears would arise inevitably from massive stress on the environment and the ability of governments to sustain the lives of their people, well then, she is not unlike any other crazed environmentalist predicting doom every two minutes.

If it is prescriptive, then she is a madwoman not unlike the madman Holdren.

We don't know though.

Epaminondas said...

I've been looking and I cannot find the apocalypse thing either.

But the problem is that this thesis FITS what we have seen from these gigantic monors.

To 'help' the nation become energy independent RAISE GAS PRICES, and PS if they go high enough we save the world because no one can afford to 'pollute' mother Gaia

I have said before in here that these people believe that PEOPLE are the problem.

We INFEST Gaia. We are evil. By Nature. That's why we selfishly seek property and ownership.

Van Jones. Holdren. EPA and coal generation. Drilling in the gulf (never let a crisis go to waste, heh?)

Anonymous said...

The public won't find Ms Tomason’s “Apocalypse Equation” anymore. Obmaa's White House moved it to 'Top Secret' classification.

Pastorius said...

Do you have ANY evidence of that, or should I just believe you?