"Regime Change
Will Be
Necessary”
click.jpg

Friday, September 28, 2012

Codifying Blasphemy?

(A follow-on to this post by Pastorius)

The UK appears to be considering jumping onto the slippery slope. Is the United States, despite our history of separation of church and state, far behind? Codifying religious blasphemy as part of the civil code is dangerous in the extreme!

And just what is the Islamic definition of blasphemy?  According to this source, the definition is nebulous and open to exploitation:
The...Quran, the primary authority in Islamic jurisprudence, offers no explicit definition of blasphemy. The hadiths, a collection of sayings attributed to Mohammed, mention briefly the “abuse of the Prophet” as a capital punishment offence...

Proponents of strict implementation of Sharia religious law usually argue that blasphemy should be punishable by death. Muslim clerics that condemn cases of blasphemy sometimes exhort on fellow Muslims to punish the perpetrators, while in some countries, conservative clerics with influence over the state judiciary pursue suspected blasphemers in state courts.

Yet in the Muslim world only Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates currently permit blasphemy to be punishable by death. Muslim clerics that condemn cases of blasphemy sometimes exhort on fellow Muslims to punish the perpetrators, while in some countries, conservative clerics with influence over the state judiciary pursue suspected blasphemers in state courts.

[...]

[I]t will be up to individual Muslim clerics – with varying degrees of juridical knowledge and reputation – to declare an individual a blasphemer. A wide variety of alleged offences have been branded as blasphemous in different environments, ranging from cultural production deemed offensive to Islam to bizarre allegations of blasphemy such as the Sudanese case of a teddy bear named Mohammed.
As I read the above citation, I think of Mona Eltahawy and her zeal as she defaced private property in the NYC subway this week  Did she not appear absolutely convinced that she had the right to do what she did?

I think of Salman Rushdie.

I think of the recent filmifada, too, of course.

And the Danish Cartoons and the ensuing outrage.

I also think of these signs that Muslims carried in the streets of London:

Offense is in the eye of the beholder. 

The slippery slope.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch at permanent link#

3 Comments:

Blogger Will said...

Very good post Pastorius. :)
I'll link to it.

Friday, September 28, 2012 1:08:00 pm  
Blogger Always On Watch said...

Will,
Actually, I did it. **wink**

Friday, September 28, 2012 6:34:00 pm  
Blogger Pastorius said...

I think Will was referring to the fact that i forgot to credit him on that post from yesterday.

sorry about that, Will.

Saturday, September 29, 2012 3:18:00 am  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home