Video : BENGHAZI GATE - “Don’t shoot them. They were sent by Dr. Morsi”
From Will at THE OTHER NEWS:
Fast forward to the 1:15 mark in this video (if you don’t understand Arabic). Watch as the raw footage of a firefight in Benghazi is taking place. The news report loops the relevant portion of an exchange between gunmen, in which one can be heard, saying, ‘Don’t Shoot us! We were sent by Mursi’!
Ashraf Ramaleh advised of a translation correction: The person is speaking in Arabic (Libyan dialect) and saying the following, “Don’t shoot them. They were sent by Dr. Morsi.”
Hmmm....The reason for the the New York Times’ bombshell report on Benghazi Saturday, contending that it was a “politicized article” aimed at harming the GOP.
THE OBAMA ADMIN WANTS NOBODY TO ASSOCIATE EX PRESIDENT MORSI and THE MUSLIM BROTHER HOOD TO BENGHAZI!
The Blaze:
A former analyst for the CIA skewered the New York Times’ bombshell report on Benghazi Saturday, contending that it was a “politicized article” aimed at harming the GOP.
I Read This Report and I Was Really Incredulous: Ex CIA Analyst Rips NYT Benghazi Report Fred Fleitz skewered the New York Times’ Saturday report on Benghazi. (Image source: Screen grab via Fox News) “I thought it was a politicized article,” Fred Fleitz told Fox News. “It tries to say that Anwar al-Sharia — that the Republican attempts to tie that to terrorism is a stretch, when even CNN says they’re at least sympathetic to Al Qaeda.”
Fleitz, who worked as a senior analyst at the CIA for nearly two decades before serving in the State Department, added that he thought the article was simply “an effort to revive this discredited theory that the anti-Islam video was behind” the deadly attacks.
“I read this report and I was really incredulous,” he said. “It seems to be an effort to revive this discredited theory that the anti-Islam video was behind it. But when you read behind the article closely, there’s various statements where the author seems to downplay the links to terrorist groups.”
“It seems to be an effort to revive this discredited theory that the anti-Islam video was behind it.”
4 comments:
I don't know if the purpose of the article is to damage the GOP, but it sure tries to give support to the official line of a spontaneous reaction to the video.
The NYT knows no shame. It is beyond hope.
NYT has not one shred of integrity left. The propaganda arm of the DNC, nothing more.
The purpose of NYT article:
1) MB just got declared. Morsi's trial on his connections with terrorism is sure to bring up Benghazi. NYT wants to make Benghazi all about the video so the Egyptian military government is discredited in the eyes of whoever believes NYT.
Morsi and MB have been supported by Obama and Hillary, NYT is bending over backwards to save their names from being associated with terrorists. And to that end, they don't mind lying.
2) Hillary and Christie just tied in a poll. Libs are going to do everything in their power to sling mud at the Republicans. This is not necessarily for 2014 but for 2016. The article is designed to give the impression that Repubs have been wasting time on things like Benghazi and are not fit to lead the country. It was put to work as though it was already planned from long ago. The article comes out, the Dems start quoting it saying the Republicans have been wasting time...
3)A lot of libs are rethinking their worship of Obama since he's been repeatedly caught lying. NYT is trying to get two birds with one stone, by saying that Obama, their god, had been right all along that it was the video! And also that the Repubs are the ones who lie not Obama.
This is a last ditch effort to save the Obama sinking ship. Far from being the greatest president, he's pretty much the worst and that is how people are going to remember him...NYT knows that and wants to reverse that trend.
Trouble is, not a lot of people read NYT and a lot of those who read it, read it for comical relief.
Phew...analysis over!
Nicoenarg
LOL
1) MB just got declared A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION**
Nicoenarg
Post a Comment