Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Documents Show Top Defense Officials Briefed Obama Minutes After Assault On Benghazi Began It Was A “Terrorist Attack,” Not A Protest About A Video



Minutes after the American consulate in Benghazi came under assault on Sept. 11, 2012, the nation’s top civilian and uniformed defense officials — headed for a previously scheduled Oval Office session with President Obama — were informed that the event was a “terrorist attack,” declassified documents show. The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president’s Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward.
Gen. Carter Ham, who at the time was head of AFRICOM, the Defense Department combatant command with jurisdiction over Libya, told the House in classified testimony last year that it was him who broke the news about the unfolding situation in Benghazi to then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The tense briefing — in which it was already known that U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens had been targeted and had gone missing — occurred just before the two senior officials departed the Pentagon for their session with the commander in chief.
According to declassified testimony obtained by Fox News, Ham — who was working out of his Pentagon office on the afternoon of Sept. 11 — said he learned about the assault on the consulate compound within 15 minutes of its commencement, at 9:42 p.m. Libya time, through a call he received from the AFRICOM Command Center.
“My first call was to General Dempsey, General Dempsey’s office, to say, ‘Hey, I am headed down the hall. I need to see him right away,’” Ham told lawmakers on the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation on June 26 of last year. “I told him what I knew. We immediately walked upstairs to meet with Secretary Panetta.”
Ham’s account of that fateful day was included in some 450 pages of testimony given by senior Pentagon officials in classified, closed-door hearings conducted last year by the Armed Services subcommittee. The testimony, given under “Top Secret” clearance and only declassified this month, presents a rare glimpse into how information during a crisis travels at the top echelons of America’s national security apparatus, all the way up to the president.
Also among those whose secret testimony was declassified was Dempsey, the first person Ham briefed about Benghazi. Ham told lawmakers he considered it a fortuitous “happenstance” that he was able to rope Dempsey and Panetta into one meeting, so that, as Ham put it, “they had the basic information as they headed across for the meeting at the White House.” Ham also told lawmakers he met with Panetta and Dempsey when they returned from their 30-minute session with President Obama on Sept. 11.
Keep reading…

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

If you like your jihadist attack you can keep your jihadist attack. Period.

Pastorius said...

Obama needs to do the right thing.

midnight rider said...

The IRS, using NSA intercepts of private phone calls, began investigating the Tea Party to see what they knew about the ATF supplying guns in a fast and furious manner to the cartels in the hopes that Hillary's enemies would get blamed for Benghazi.

But what does it matter? We have bigger fish to fry.

A bridge closure and a traffic jam and MY GOD! he may have used relief funds to produce an ad or two that promoted his state and it's comeback from the storm the relief funds were issued for.

Nevermind that a case could be made that by promoting his state he was using those funds to help in it's recovery by bringing in badly needed tourist dollars.

And I can't even stand the guy but geez, folks, compared to what the Scofflaw In Chief has been pulling these last few years. . .

Charles Martel said...

All these people should be tried for treason. It was their duty to unmask the lies of the administration. Had they done the correct thing, Obama would not be there, and Hillary would not have the slightest chance in 2016. But they are all spineless creatures slithering through life.

Always On Watch said...

Do Americans care enough to be outraged?

Anonymous said...

Always . . .they care & continue to be outraged but have been muted by their elected & politically appointed servants to believe they "have no legal standing" from which their outrage could make any difference.

Charles Martel said...

I'm outraged at all our representatives in Congress, both senators and congressmen. Are they all dead? Morally, at least.