Does not mention HAMAS stopping rocket fire, or IDF leaving Gaza. (Must be created by Obama law writers)
No matter, HAMAS says no cease fire is possible unless the blockade of Gaza is lifted.
I mean, HOW ARE THEY SUPPOSED TO GET MORE ROCKETS AND CONCRETE FOR TUNNELS? You know, for their peaceful objective.
HAMAS COVENANT: Article 13 There is no negotiated settlement possible. Jihad is the only answer
That poll was designed and conducted by Palestinians.
Every time I have introduced this poll into a twitter conversation with Arabs about peace and ending the endless violence in the middle east, the comeback is, that ‘well the Jews are living on land stolen from Palestinians’. The fact that this poll gives the LIE to a two state solution, or that NOTHING is different today from 1967 (except Israel had a lot more land) never occurs.
But they cannot understand EVEN ONCE that this concept carried through to the end can only mean that civilizational war of the peoples is going on between the Palestinians and the Israelis, and that Gaza (especially after freely voting in HAMAS) is no different from Schweinfurt, Regensburg, Berlin, Nagoya, Tokyo, or HIROSHIMA, and that Gaza is not reduced to the state of those sad cities by 1945 is because the Israelis DON’T WANT THAT END.
YET
No matter, HAMAS says no cease fire is possible unless the blockade of Gaza is lifted.
I mean, HOW ARE THEY SUPPOSED TO GET MORE ROCKETS AND CONCRETE FOR TUNNELS? You know, for their peaceful objective.
HAMAS COVENANT: Article 13 There is no negotiated settlement possible. Jihad is the only answer
Every time I have introduced this poll into a twitter conversation with Arabs about peace and ending the endless violence in the middle east, the comeback is, that ‘well the Jews are living on land stolen from Palestinians’. The fact that this poll gives the LIE to a two state solution, or that NOTHING is different today from 1967 (except Israel had a lot more land) never occurs.
But they cannot understand EVEN ONCE that this concept carried through to the end can only mean that civilizational war of the peoples is going on between the Palestinians and the Israelis, and that Gaza (especially after freely voting in HAMAS) is no different from Schweinfurt, Regensburg, Berlin, Nagoya, Tokyo, or HIROSHIMA, and that Gaza is not reduced to the state of those sad cities by 1945 is because the Israelis DON’T WANT THAT END.
YET
4 comments:
Hey Epa, check it out. Here is the quote from Article 13 of the Hamas Charter:
"There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors. The Palestinian people know better than to consent to having their future, rights and fate toyed with. As in said in the honourable Hadith:
"The people of Syria are Allah's lash in His land. He wreaks His vengeance through them against whomsoever He wishes among His slaves It is unthinkable that those who are double-faced among them should prosper over the faithful. They will certainly die out of grief and desperation."
"
I had never thought about this Article before. I remember thinking, ok yeah, Jihad is the only way, blah blah blah.
But wait.
Doesn't it say Jihad is the way, and then immediately jump to SYRIA?
Again, "the people of Palestine"
...
"The people of Syria"
...
Are the people of Palestine and the people of Syria being equated here?
If so, what does that mean?
Is this an admission within the contents of the Hamas Charter itself that there is no such thing as a "Palestinian people"?
Jihadists believe in the ummah and the caliphate, not the nation state and they see themseleves as muslims and then arabs not gazanz or palestinians or syrians or jordanians etc.
Right. I know that. You know that.
But the question is is this an admission that there is no such thing as a Palestinian people?
Post a Comment