All of us, every single man, woman, and child on the face of the Earth were born with the same unalienable rights; to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And, if the governments of the world can't get that through their thick skulls, then, regime change will be necessary.
Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Oxford Holds Debate On the Question of Whether Israel is a Greater Threat To Peace Than Hamas, Dennis Prager Participates and Calls Them on Their Absurdity
4 comments:
Anonymous
said...
As I watch Prager's opening statement, I cannot help but notice the sullen posture of the unconvinced bearded throne centered behind Prager, as well as the anxious blonde and smug fella behind him seated at the wall to Prager's right. "holding their temper" is a mild understatement for their reactions to Prager. If a blade could have been managed to pass through security, I have no doubt these individuals would have justified it's use.
I posed a question in another post a couple of days ago. I think it is relevant to what you say:
Hey Europe, if you used to be involved in killing Jews, and then you stop killing Jews, but you invite a whole new population into your territory who would love to kill Jews, HAVE YOU REALLY CHANGED?
the destructive behaviors we witness today directly follow Coudenhove-Kalergi who wrote the Pan-Europa manifesto of 1923-24 (a good English language translation of this would provide a useful introduction/prerequisite to Bat Ye’or’s “Eurabia”) His ideas influenced Aristide Briand, who gave a speech in favour of a European Union in the League of Nations on 8 September 1929, and who in 1930 wrote a “Memorandum on the Organization of a Regime of European Federal Union” for the Government of France, which became the first European government formally to adopt the principle based upon forgiveness at all costs, particularly to be forgetful of history.
So, I think you are saying that you believe the Euro-Arab Dialogue was a natural outgrowth of the one world concept of the League of Nations/UN, and that also, the EU is a natural outgrowth of that, and that "looking the other way/forgiveness" is a moral prerequisite and necessary function of such one world-type entities.
I can see what you mean by that, but why is it that Israel/the Jews are the ones who get left out in the cold when such large-scale alliances are mandated?
I can only believe it is because of inherent anti-Semitism.
4 comments:
As I watch Prager's opening statement, I cannot help but notice the sullen posture of the unconvinced bearded throne centered behind Prager, as well as the anxious blonde and smug fella behind him seated at the wall to Prager's right. "holding their temper" is a mild understatement for their reactions to Prager. If a blade could have been managed to pass through security, I have no doubt these individuals would have justified it's use.
Yes. I agree.
I posed a question in another post a couple of days ago. I think it is relevant to what you say:
Hey Europe, if you used to be involved in killing Jews, and then you stop killing Jews, but you invite a whole new population into your territory who would love to kill Jews, HAVE YOU REALLY CHANGED?
True but it's far more complicated than that.
http://www.eurocanadian.ca/2015/02/ideological-and-geopolitical-origins-of-eu-richard-von-coudenhove-kalergis-pan-europa.html
the destructive behaviors we witness today directly follow Coudenhove-Kalergi who wrote the Pan-Europa manifesto of 1923-24 (a good English language translation of this would provide a useful introduction/prerequisite to Bat Ye’or’s “Eurabia”)
His ideas influenced Aristide Briand, who gave a speech in favour of a European Union in the League of Nations on 8 September 1929, and who in 1930 wrote a “Memorandum on the Organization of a Regime of European Federal Union” for the Government of France, which became the first European government formally to adopt the principle based upon forgiveness at all costs, particularly to be forgetful of history.
So, I think you are saying that you believe the Euro-Arab Dialogue was a natural outgrowth of the one world concept of the League of Nations/UN, and that also, the EU is a natural outgrowth of that, and that "looking the other way/forgiveness" is a moral prerequisite and necessary function of such one world-type entities.
I can see what you mean by that, but why is it that Israel/the Jews are the ones who get left out in the cold when such large-scale alliances are mandated?
I can only believe it is because of inherent anti-Semitism.
Post a Comment