SCENARIO: Imagine an important government official or high ranking uniformed officer were really a mole for the islamist terror network and wanted to signal to any and all plotters that no security agency had gotten wiind of any plots so it was a good time to strike. How might he do it?
SIMPLE: By announcing to the public that there were no known specific imminent plots. This would give the plotters the free and clear to ahead to attack when ready.
-------
Please note the following:
Hours before the Paris terror attack, Obama declared ISIL contained. Questions were raised about the timing of that declaration wondering if it signaled IS/ISIS/ISIL/Daesh to pull the trigger.
SoS John Kerry also made a public declaration claiming MSNBC: al qaeda 'neutralized' again, this official declaration, made just hours before the terror attack in Mali, raising the same questions.
(Video) Al-Murabitoon, with al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, Claims Responsibility for Mali Hotel Attack
Did Kerry's declaration about 'al qaeda being neutralized' give the signal to the al qaeda terrorists in Mali to pull the trigger too?
It certainly does begin to illustrate a pattern of official declarations about the strength of enemy combatants and imminent terror attacks.
So is it still a simple coincidence or evidence of Obama and Kerry being played as dupes/puppets by Muslim Brotherhood advisors within their administration or, even worse, are they willingly complicit?
-------
UPDATE - Breaking: Taliban Attacking Kandahar Airport in Afghanistan
Didn't Obama recently state something to the effect that "the Taliban is a much less formidable force than ISIS" recently too?
4 comments:
I've mentioned this before and you've posted it...
Hours before the Paris terror attack, Obama declared ISIL contained. Questions were raised about the timing of that declaration wondering if it signaled IS/ISIS/ISIL/Daesh to pull the trigger.
SoS John Kerry also made a public declaration claiming MSNBC: al qaeda 'neutralized' again, this official declaration, made just hours before the terror attack in Mali, raising the same questions.
(Video) Al-Murabitoon, with al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, Claims Responsibility for Mali Hotel Attack
Did Kerry's declaration about 'al qaeda being neutralized' give the signal to the al qaeda terrorists in Mali to pull the trigger too?
It certainly does begin to illustrate a pattern of official declarations about the strength of enemy combatants and imminent terror attacks.
So is it still a simple coincidence or evidence of Obama and Kerry being played as dupes/puppets by Muslim Brotherhood advisors within their administration or, even worse, are they willingly complicit?
Yes, thank you. I will repost the information you have left here.
Breaking: Taliban Attacking Kandahar Airport in Afghanistan
Didn't Obama recently state something to the effect that "the Taliban is a much less formidable force than ISIS" recently too?
Anonymous, this would require a complex conspiracy of disinformation, unless of course, our leaders are complicit. And although Kerry is definitely an imbecile parroting the party narrative, I don't see him as a conscious traitor, but who knows ...?
I believe a more realistic scenario, is that anticipating stupid comments from our leaders, our enemies, whatever name they use, are ready to attack after the next comment, making us look stupid, out of touch, reviving the American paper tiger of the past.
Post a Comment