Friday, July 01, 2016

Report: FBI Told Reporters “No Photos, No Pictures, No Cell Phones” of Bill Clinton-AG Loretta Lynch Meeting



Alright, I ignored this story UNTIL this report.

I figured it was just the "Conservative" media attempting to make hay our out of waves of the hand.

But telling reporters they are not allowed to take photos is a kind of admission of guilt. Where there's smoke there's fire:
“The former president steps into her plane. They then speak for 30 minutes privately. The FBI there on the tarmac instructing everybody around ‘no photos, no pictures, no cell phones.’” 
Since when is it against the law to take photos of public officials? 
First of all, it isn’t the FBI’s job to tell journalists or private citizens they can’t take photographs of a former president and the Attorney General. 
What were the agents going to do, arrest people for taking a picture or video? Also, if there was nothing wrong with the meeting and it was totally innocent, why were federal agents instructed to demand no one take a picture? 
Finally, let’s stop focusing on the fact that this meeting was inappropriate because Clinton’s wife is under investigation by Lynch’s Justice Department. I mean, that’s bad, but it’s actually letting Lynch and Clinton off the hook a bit. 
By focusing on the appearance of conflict because Hillary Clinton is being investigated, we are willfully overlooking the very real conflict in the fact that Clinton himself is under investigation, as the Grand Poo-bah at the Clinton Foundation.
I have a question, and this might betray my ignorance: WHY WOULD THE FBI BE THERE AT ALL? Does the FBI follow ex-Presidents around to protect them? Not to my knowledge. Does the FBI go wherever the Attorney General goes? Not to my knowledge. So why were they there unless there was FBI business taking place there ... on a tarmac ... at the Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport.

There was no reason for the FBI to be there if this was just a chance meeting. There was no reason for the FBI to be there, unless there was some official FBI business going on.

MEANWHILE:

AG Lynch Says She Will Accept FBI Recommendations on Hillary Clinton Email Case

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Fox: Jeanine Pirro reacts to Bill Clinton's meeting with AG Lynch Lynch is not recusing herself, she is not deferring to the prosecutors, AND Hillary will NOT be indicted as Loretta Lynch and Obama are supporting Hillary's run for POTUS. Prosecutors look at cases all the time, Lynch will accept LE/FBI determinations yet not indict because the first witness will be the President of the US. Hillary e-mailed the POTUS, and he therefore knew about the risk of security. "Everyone knew" about the private server...therefore to indict Hillary would be self incrimination of this administration. THE FIX IS IN.

Anonymous said...


Attorney General Loretta Lynch will accept the recommendations of the FBI on the server matter when James Comey finishes his work. (New York Times)


Attorney General Lynch reserves the right to overrule the recommendation of career prosecutors and the FBI in the Hillary Clinton email probe.

I had NO idea the AG was now in a position to de-criminalize treason.

If ever an example of impropriety existed, this case with Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch certainly meets that criteria given the FBI is investigating TWO Clinton matters: Hillary's E-mailgate AND the Clinton Foundation which was collecting donations and fees from all over the world while Herself was acting in the capacity of Secretary of State.

BTW...Breitbart: Obama Administration Wants to Keep Clinton Foundation Emails Hidden Until Late 2018

Always On Watch said...

This Lynch-Clinton meeting STINKS OUT LOUD!

It is not something ginned up by the conservative media.

Always On Watch said...

The Clintons must "have something" on Loretta Lynch for her to have consented to this meeting with Bill Clinton.

What is that something?