Saturday, July 15, 2017

In Between Giving Bathroom Stall Blowjobs, Hawaiian Judge Defies US Supreme Court, Re-Establishes Travel Ban By His Own Fiat


Hawaii Judge Defies US Supreme Court – When Will Weak GOP Congress Impeach This Leftist Clown?


9 comments:

Anonymous said...

CrowdsourcetheTruth: Ratline Lawyers of CT Ave

In this video clip, George Webb, Jason Goodman and Trish Pagon discuss the arms within 33 Muslim Terror training camps in America.
Transcript:
===>Jason: "How are the Muslim training camps getting stockpiles of weapons?
George: "Islamburg was searched and these weapons were found. Who supplied these camps located in America? What I think - Islamburg - she's referring to a camp in NY..."<===

He mentions Sailorsburg, Plainsville, Indiana and Wheeling locations as well since he actually visited the areas in which those sites are located briefly.

===>"There's 33 of them I think and 'deep uranium' has identified them as well as 'the uranium 5' (nics) these are weapons caches. This is Gladio and Gladio be all over again."<====

George continues chat style which doesn't work well with transcript. You can follow his discussion at the preset link

Kid said...

POS has no jurisdiction. IGNORE THE prick.

midnight rider said...

Saylorsburg and Islamburg for spelling (that's not a criticism) if anyone is bothering (that is) to Google or search here (we've had tons on them)

Where the hell is Paul Williams when we need him?

Pastorius said...

He and Michael Travis have disappeared.

Always On Watch said...

The vague wording of the SCOTUS allowed for this to happen!

No wonder that all 9 justices were on board. If I recall correctly, the ruling was unanimous. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Always On Watch said...

Pasto,
He and Michael Travis have disappeared.

For the latter, see THIS and THIS. No posts at the second one for a while, though.

Pastorius said...

What do you mean, "the vague wording... allowed this to happen"?

Always On Watch said...

Pasto,
Here is some information.

From the WaPo:

...The Supreme Court ruled late last month that the government could begin enforcing the travel restrictions, but not on people with “a credible claim of a bona fide relationship” with a person or entity in the United States.

The Trump administration then decided to make exceptions for spouses, parents, parents-in-law, children, sons-in-law and daughters-in-law, fiances and siblings of those already in the country. However, they barred grandparents, grandchildren, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, cousins, brothers-in-law and sisters-in-law.

[...]

In his ruling, Watson wrote that modifying the scope of the ban is “necessary to preserve the status quo” in regard to the government’s definition of “close familial relationship.” The government’s use of specific, family-based visa restrictions “constitutes cherry-picking,” and contradicts the Supreme Court’s decision late last month, Watson wrote....


From what I understand, the SCOTUS did not specify what a close familiar relationship entails. The judge in Hawaii went with the idea of extended family.

From this WaPo article:

...In Watson’s ruling, he said the government’s definition of what constitutes close family “represents the antithesis of common sense.”

“Common sense, for instance, dictates that close family members be defined to include grandparents,” Watson wrote. “Indeed, grandparents are the epitome of close family members. The Government’s definition excludes them. That simply cannot be.”...

Kid said...

Hope they've disappeared for good.