All of us, every single man, woman, and child on the face of the Earth were born with the same unalienable rights; to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And, if the governments of the world can't get that through their thick skulls, then, regime change will be necessary.
Tuesday, October 17, 2017
London Independent Uses Weinstein Sex Scandal To Promote Islam As “Solution” To Violence Against Women
Your women are your fields, so go into your fields whichever way you like . . . . (MAS Abdel Haleem, The Qur’an, Oxford UP, 2004)
3 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Now this is telling. Why does a major Secular Progressive media outlet in the UK come to suggest that Harvey Weinstein and society in general would be better served had Sharia Law have been in effect?
The elephant in this room is the fact that the last name of "Weinstein" strongly suggests a Jewish heritage and lineage. The obvious question here should not be one of Sharia, but why Mr. Weinstein does not look to Torah (and other Jewish cultural guardrails) by which to regulate his life?
More important to me is why the Independent chooses to speak highly of Sharia when they could just as easily speak highly of Torah. I have read both. Sharia imposes a hell of its own. Torah outlines a very rational and systematic framework of life. The fruits of both systems can be tested by any number of metrics. How many Nobel Prizes are credited to societies based on Torah vs those based on Sharia? How many lifesaving drugs, how many inventions, what about number of symphonies composed, etc.
Should we also count the car-bomb metric in this comparison. How many suicide bombers do we see in any recent year who come from societies that are rooted in Torah compared to those rooted in Sharia?
Yes, Independent editors. Let us have that comparison. Bring it on. And when we are done, will you still speak so highly of Sharia. For the UK?
3 comments:
Now this is telling. Why does a major Secular Progressive media outlet in the UK come to suggest that Harvey Weinstein and society in general would be better served had Sharia Law have been in effect?
The elephant in this room is the fact that the last name of "Weinstein" strongly suggests a Jewish heritage and lineage. The obvious question here should not be one of Sharia, but why Mr. Weinstein does not look to Torah (and other Jewish cultural guardrails) by which to regulate his life?
More important to me is why the Independent chooses to speak highly of Sharia when they could just as easily speak highly of Torah. I have read both. Sharia imposes a hell of its own. Torah outlines a very rational and systematic framework of life. The fruits of both systems can be tested by any number of metrics. How many Nobel Prizes are credited to societies based on Torah vs those based on Sharia? How many lifesaving drugs, how many inventions, what about number of symphonies composed, etc.
Should we also count the car-bomb metric in this comparison. How many suicide bombers do we see in any recent year who come from societies that are rooted in Torah compared to those rooted in Sharia?
Yes, Independent editors. Let us have that comparison. Bring it on. And when we are done, will you still speak so highly of Sharia. For the UK?
-- theBuckWheat
http://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/Arlandson/women_fields.htm
Mohammed in Sura 2:223: Women are your fields, boys. Plow her any way you want.
You're correct, sir!
Post a Comment