Monday, July 09, 2018

Lola Astanova
Rachmaninoff Moment Musicaux Op. 16, No. 4


4 comments:

Pastorius said...

I suddenly find myself LOVING Rachmaninoff.

Anonymous said...

Been a fan of Rachmaninoff since 1980 when his music was featured in the soundtrack of the film "Somewhere in Time" as interpretted by John Barry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mppbf-94Ohs

Anonymous said...

OT
Interesting video interview of Larry Klayman of FreedomWatchUSA.org worth noting for clarifying the difference between the two organizations he started FreedomWatchUSA.org and JudicialWatch.org
Rough transcript of related segment follows:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLReMSWaHow
ff 11:08 to hear Larry Klayman of FreedomWatchUSA.org explain the fallout between the two organizations he started the the different functions each perform.

11:15 Tom Fitton, who is not a lawyer, always felt very competitive with me when I left, when I ran for the US Senate. He did all kinds of things to try to harm me and my family and it’s beyond the pale at this point...but, let me explain the difference.
By the way, I have a verdict for malicious defamation in Florida, where I was defamed by Judicial Watch while being run by Fitton.
Here’s the difference between the two groups right now...
Judicial Watch – and I’ll give them credit, they do a good job at getting documents. But it’s a lot like playing cards. If you’re going to play cards and win, you’re going to have to put money on the table and that’s what I do here at Freedom Watch. I’m doing the heavy lifting. We get documents and communications from the media on Sept. 4th which will likely show criminal
grand jury leaks. It might be the end of Mueller. There was a report yesterday in Politico that there was a confirmed leak regarding Paul Manafort. But, what I do is file hard hitting law suits and the Citizens Grand Jury. Judicial Watch will never stick their neck out that far. When you go get documents and you have documents that the media want, then you’ll wind up on Fox News. You’ll wind up on Hannity. You’ll wind up on Tucker Carlson, you wind up
on Ingraham – because they want the documents. I’m not interested in getting on Fox News. First of all, I can’t say what I want to say on Fox News because it’s censored. That’s why I like being on with you (Jason Goodman of Crowdsource the truth) and being on NewsMax and InfoWars because I can say it straight up. I can never say, on Fox News for instance, that Obama sympathizes with Arabs and Arab nations that dislike Israel because he’s half Muslim. You can’t say that. But we know that’s the case. We know that the birth certificate of Obama is fraudulent. Ok? You say that and you’re branded a racist. You can’t say that on Fox News.
So, the point is, that I have a niche at Freedom Watch. No one is doing what I’m with my colleagues are doing at Freedom Watch. No one is sticking their neck out risking everything for the American people by bringing hard hitting cases. It’s just not enough to get documents. That’s entertainment.
We see the dog and pony show up on Capitol Hill. We see the dog and pony show on Fox News and I’m thankful there is a Fox News. It doesn’t go far enough and hold out false hope. Hannity holds out hope that something is going to happen.
It’s not going to happen. It boosts his ratings. ....

Anonymous said...

Recall:

Mueller requests 70 blank subpoenas in Manafort case (May 2018)
*********


The NYT article revealed: Manafort contacted 2 colleagues and was told by the judge that he "should have known" they were "potential witnesses" and even if he abstained from contacting the 56 listed witnesses, what about a hypothetical 57? So talking to ANYONE was "tampering."
https://twitter.com/EinahSirro/status/1016392684305408000