It has been 3 years, 4 months, and 23 days (1,243 total days) and I am finally back in my office at the university that employs me. I was banished from my workspaces almost 3.5 years ago following a radio interview in which I expressed concerns about the systemic biodistribution of COVID-19 shots throughout the body. I disclosed scientific data that aligned with the long history of lipid nanoparticle technology, but contrasted with the dominant global narrative that existed at that time. My ‘controversial statements’ are now well-accepted facts in the scientific literature.
In response, some of my colleagues participated in a well-coordinated global defamation campaign against me. I found myself the target of chronic harassment that has not ceased to this day. Rather than tackle my message, they chose to repeatedly attack the messenger.
I sought some kind of restoration of formerly productive working relationships with four of these colleagues. Instead, they formally expressed feelings of fear should I be allowed to be anywhere in their vicinity. This purported fear was initially limited to the university campus boundary, and then shrunk to the building housing my office and laboratory, despite only two of the four complainants being in that building.
I was prohibited from accessing my workspaces due to ‘feelings’ expressed by my colleagues. Their feelings were catered to; mine, which were based on experiencing tangible and chronic harassment were ignored. Campus and municipal police investigated the situation and consultants were hired by the university to conduct further investigations.
Every report (or summary thereof) that I have seen has concluded that I never represented a ‘real and present danger’ to my colleagues. They even state that the complainants themselves have admitted that I never presented as a ‘real and present danger’. In fact, documentary evidence that I have seen shows that at least one of them amplified their actions against me with an intent to drive me to the point of such frustration that I would feel compelled to contact the police for help.
You know that a person is feigning fear of the bear when they make it their goal to keep poking the bear until a negative reaction is elicited.
As a consequence of my colleagues making their request to have their feelings appeased I was banished from my laboratory and office for 3.5 years. In recognition of the fact that I never presented as a ‘real and present danger’, my banishment has officially been deemed to be a ‘non-disciplinary’ action. But my research program has now been utterly destroyed and I have suffered irreparable harm to my professional reputation. So, if this was ‘non-disciplinary’, I would hate to see what ‘discipline’ would have looked like.
So, I now have access again to my office. However, and remarkably, I am still not allowed to enter my laboratory. Don’t ask me why because I have yet to be presented with a rationale, especially when everyone that has been consulted has defined me to be a non-threat. Even now, I cannot fully commit to initiating the rebuild of my research program. I had a bad experience after obtaining funding when I was told (for the umpteenth time) one year ago that the return to my lab was imminent. I was accused by my administration of failing to conduct the research that I had proposed to do. This was dropped when I explained that I did not conduct the research that I had promised to do because the administration would not allow me to do the research that I had intended to conduct because they had banished me from my lab. They agreed that it seemed unreasonable to expect me to perform the research when I was not allowed to perform my research. After this utterly ridiculous scenario played out there was agreement that I should not even seek more funding until I find myself physically present in my lab again; so that wait continues.
No comments:
Post a Comment