All of us, every single man, woman, and child on the face of the Earth were born with the same unalienable rights; to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And, if the governments of the world can't get that through their thick skulls, then, regime change will be necessary.
Former president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany Charlotte Knobloch claims that Jews are increasingly under threat in public and may require police protection to lead a normal life without harassment and violence.
Ms Knobloch, who is now the President of the Jewish Community of Munich and Upper Bavaria, said that Jews are increasingly under threat, Die Welt reports.
“Aggressive anti-Semitism, from verbal hostility on the Internet and in the analogue world to desecration and destruction to physical attacks are commonplace in Germany,” she said.
“Jewish life can only take place in public under police protection and the strictest security precautions, or it must be completely cancelled for security reasons,” Knobloch added.
[...]
In a survey of Jews in Germany, many said that most of the violent attacks they experienced came from Muslims, while far-right and far-left attacks were mostly limited to verbal harassment or harassment online....
Arabic is the fastest-growing language in American households — and that’s leading the US Census Bureau to explore the tricky task of adjusting its questionnaires to accommodate the language’s right-to-left script.
The bureau is using focus groups to explore possible changes to the 2020 census questionnaires for Arabic speakers who are not English-proficient, the Pew Research Center reported Friday.
Arabic is now the seventh-most commonly spoken non-English language in US households. An estimated 1.1 million people ages 5 and older speak Arabic at home, an increase of 29 percent between 2010 and 2014.
The number who speak Spanish at home has grown only 6 percent during the same period.
Of those who speak Arabic at home, 38 percent are not proficient in English, according to census estimates.
That’s just below the 42 percent English-proficiency rate among the 39.3 million US residents who speak Spanish at home.
The growth in Arabic is linked to continued immigration from Middle Eastern and North African countries, according to the Pew Research Center....
1/4 of Japanese men have never had sex with a woman.
It goes without saying, these men do not have girlfriends or wives. They sit at home alone in their society of success. They are lonely. They fantasize.
Sick of dining alone? A Japanese curry brand not only understands your plight, they’ve also come up with a solution: a curry that comes packaged with a girlfriend – albeit in DVD form.
The appropriately named Men’s Delusion Curry is an instant curry served with a side of 27-year-old model Mao Harada, who appears in a DVD that comes with the meal. According to RocketNews24, lonely men can choose to see Harada acting out one of three different roles on video, either “The Younger Girlfriend,” “The Older Girl Who Lives Next Door and is Sort of Risqué” or “Haradan Made a Home-Cooked Meal.”
Frankly, the last one sounds the most delusional of them all: You just microwaved an instant curry. It’s one thing to fantasize about having a girlfriend, but let’s not drag meal preparation into this web of lies.
Apparently, getting a fake video girlfriend with your instant curry comes at a premium. Men’s Delusion Curry costs a relatively pricey $13. Though, truth be told, that’s a lot cheaper than it would cost to take an actual girlfriend out to an actual meal. Maybe these delusional guys are on to something.
That article is written in a breezy pop culture manner which belies the immense sadness of the story.
... the proportion of Japanese men in their 30s who still have their virginity has gotten so high that society has coined a new slang term to describe them: yaramiso.
According to a survey done in 2012 by Japan’s National Institute of Population and Security Research, almost 25 percent of men between the ages of 30 and 34 have never had sex
The story of Japan’s declining birthrate is not a new one. Measures are underway to ensure that the country does not evolve into a giant nursing home. But in spite of the fact that the government is offering monetary incentives to young married couples, and that businesses are enforcing compulsory holidays, the percentage of children being born into the new generation is not increasing rapidly enough. With just an average of 1.39 children born per Japanese female, it’s time to take a look at the root causes.
There are entire shops dedicated to the selling of condoms, regular DVD shops which only retail the one variety of DVD, and seemingly innocent home depots which display plastic phalluses so big I could dress one up in 4-year-old’s clothing and push it around in a pram for a few weeks before anyone would be any the wiser. Only the other day I pulled up alongside a car while waiting at the traffic lights and glanced over, only to discover a guy watching full frontal penetration on his dashboard DVD screen. It was 11am.
The "tranquility chair" is built in the shape of a larger-than-life fabric doll with a friendly face and a fetching hat, but more importantly, it has long arms that wrap around the user in an affectionate embrace.
"It makes you feel safe.
The chair is priced at 46,000 yen ($419) and there is also a version adapted for wheelchair users.
And of course, Japan is the world's leader in sex robots:
Japan’s population shrank by its largest amount on record in 2014. Roughly 1.001 million people were born and 1.269 million people died last year, leaving the country with 268,000 fewer people overall.
When we look around the world, we realize Japan is not the only country actively committing demographic suicide.
We are importing Islamic extremism, Arab anti-Semitism, national and ethnic conflicts of other peoples, as well as a different understanding of society and law." — From a leaked German intelligence document.
"We need to be clear that there must be limits and quotas for immigration -- we cannot save the whole world." — Markus Söder, Finance Minister of Bavaria.
"The migration crisis has the potential to destabilize governments, countries and the whole European continent. ... What we have been facing is not a refugee crisis. This is a migratory movement composed of economic migrants, refugees and also foreign fighters" — Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán.
Germany's Muslim population is set to nearly quadruple to an astonishing 20 million within the next five years, according to a demographic forecast by Bavarian lawmakers.
The German government expects to receive 1.5 million asylum seekers in 2015, and possibly even more in 2016.
After factoring in family reunifications -- based on the assumption that individuals whose asylum applications are approved will subsequently bring an average of four additional family members to Germany -- that number will swell exponentially. This is in addition to the 5.8 million Muslims already living in Germany.
According to the president of the Bavarian Association of Municipalities (Bayerische Gemeindetag), Uwe Brandl, Germany is now on track to have "20 million Muslims by 2020."
The surge in Germany's Muslim population represents a demographic shift of epic proportions, one that will change the face of Germany forever, "but we are just standing by, watching it happen."
Why would Germany and Japan just stand by and watch while their death comes speeding at them with such inevitability?
What do Germany and Japan have in common?
The answer is clear and simple:
America beat the shit out of both nations, and then we set about changing their cultures with an equal vengeance.
We erased the existing warrior codes from each culture, leaving men without a functional way to be men.
In Japan, the men have been left neutered.
Neutered men are not attractive to women. This means women will not marry men, they will not have sex with men, they will not have children with men.
And that means the culture will disappear.
In Germany, the men have been left ethically neutered, and angry with themselves for the evil they have wrought. Germany has told itself repeatedly (at the behest of the rest of the world, and especially at the behest of America) that it's hatred of "The Other" was evil and criminal at it's root, and that it should never, ever, ever make that mistake again.
Given that that is what we have done to Germany, it is no surprise that we now see Germany laying out the welcome mat for a population of people who want to destroy Germany.
Would we rather Japan was still overflowing with Shinto Warriors willing to divebomb Zeroes into the decks of our battleships?
Would we rather Germany was filled with the hatred and rage of Nazism?
No, of course not.
But I think we need to admit to ourselves that we threw the baby out with the bathwater when we ransacked the cultures of Germany and Japan.
These nations are great, have proven themselves to be great and productive, and useful.
And now we are watching their demise.
We can not be happy about this.
Men's Delusion Curry is an excellent metaphor for the diminution and gradual destruction of powerful, creative, and productive cultures for the benefit of weak, dependent, Third World cultures
Men's Delusion Curry is not funny in the end. It is tragic.
A friend of mine and I have been having an email conversation about the "Migrant crisis" in Europe.
Friend:
To me the only real question is what will happen as a result. My main expectation is an increase in the formation of insular ghettoes, and more reactionary responses. To be honest I'm a bit surprised there haven't been reactionary responses (white-power/skinhead gangs, etc) across Europe already. I think you and I were expecting such a phenomenon 10 years ago. Or maybe there are and have been and we just aren't told about them in mainstream media because that wouldn't serve the agenda. ..
None of it is what I would design if I were in charge of European policy, of course, but I'm not. As things stand it kind of feels like, if Europe takes these people, that's a safety valve for us, because it means we won't have to.
... the fact that they're mostly young men; that can be explained away by just saying, Well of course, that's who can be mobile; has fewer attachments so they more easily escape war zones.
The idea that it's a kind of invasion-force..ehh, yes and no.
This isn't really how conquering looks in my opinion, a nation shattering and scattering itself amid civil wars killing themselves by the tens of thousands?
Ultimately it'll be a question of which culture wins the mind-space, and it seems to me that a bunch of twentysomething Syrians who didn't want to fight for Assad (or ISIS) might just as easily get addicted to Western pop culture as to radical shiekhs.
At the very least, it's a split...
Me:
It doesn't seem to me there is much precedent for Muslim refugees getting addicted to Euro pop culture
Euro porn culture and inevitable rape gangs, yes,
but euro pop culture and integration, NO.
By the way, are you aware that the population of the city of Rotherham England is about 250,000
and out of that
1400 girls were raped (almost all as underage children)?
I believe all of them were white girls.
Given the fact that we know English people are breeding at a less than replacement rate, we can surmise this means a HUGE PERCENTAGE of the actual existing teenage white girls in Rotherham were raped.
THAT is what you can expect out of this migration, in my opinion.
Friend:
No argument with you, just to be clear.
Rotherham is the sort of thing I'd have expected to have led to some sort of Euro nationalist
backlash by now. But it really hasn't, has it? Did I miss it?
The dynamic that seems likely is - again - ghettoization. Balkanization, to use perhaps a more apt term. Enclaves of 'immigrations' (and descendents), who live mostly separate and apart from the native population, which engages in 'white flight' from them to the extent they can.
It sounds like perhaps Rotherham was a case where the natives weren't as able to 'white-flight' themselves away from the foreigners, and, well, that was the result. So this dynamic punishes natives at the bottom of the economic pyramid, disproportionately.
This will increase 'economic inequality'...
We had some of the same dynamics in the older cores of big cities, whites who had lived in areas that ended up with an influx of blacks, and getting victimized as a result (though usually not nearly as egregious as Rotherham, I think). This was sort of a 1960s-70s story, the story of "Death Wish".
Once the white-flight had completed however, by the 80s-90s, it just became that "inner city" was a code-word for "black", and the big crime problem among blacks was mostly them victimizing each other (gang warfare, Crips v Bloods, the stuff that 'The Wire' guy keeps writing about Baltimore).
By then most white-flighters were safely away so didn't have to notice, except on TV and in movies...like 'The Wire'.
That's sort of what I see as a best-case scenario for this Muslim immigration into Europe: an uneasy peace/truce, because the people are (mostly) separated.
What do you think?
It's something to watch either way, as a precursor, because we're going to experience a similar dynamic sooner or later.
I'm aware there are big Muslim enclaves in some parts of the country - I think there's a part of Minnesota with a lot of Somalis for some reason, for example. And Virginia often comes up as a place with radicalized Middle Easterners.
We'll see.
I know it's retrograde to say but I think 'separation' can help...
Me:
I think there is little backlash. (That does not mean the common people are not aware of the problem, however.)
The only "backlash" there has been has been small groups of nationalists like Britain First, the English Defense League and some German and Austrian groups.
Marine Le Pen has gained some traction in France.
Well, that's interesting, your idea that "separation can help".
And I know you're saying that's the best-case scenario. But, I don't see any evidence of gradual integration in the Muslim community; the opposite really.
Six years ago Dr. Peter Hammond published a remarkable book which included a statistical study of the correlation between Muslim to non-Muslim population ratios and the transition from conciliatory Islam to fascist Islam. The stages are the same in 2011 but the demographics have changed to show an alarming progression. Many European nations and the U.S. are on the cusp of moving to a higher bracket. The demographics change but the story is the same. First comes the taqiyya and the kitman; then comes the Sword of Islam. Imam Rauf, the Ground Zero Mosque promoter, is the current master of taqiyya. He has gulled everyone from Bloomberg to Maureen Dowd of the NYT -- who fanaticizes over male Muslims. Expect doppelgangers of Khomeini for stage 5 and Islamic PEACE at last.
Stage 1. Establish a Beachhead
Population density à 2% (US, Australia, Canada).
Muslims are conciliatory, deferential but request harmless special treatment (foot bath facilities, removal/elimination of that which is offensive to delicate Muslim sensibilities - like walking dogs near Mosques).
Stage 2. Establish Outposts
Population density 2% - 5% (UK, Germany, Denmark).
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. A recent example is that of Sheikh Abdullah el-Faisal who is back in Jamaica after being kicked out of the UK. Sound harmless? Read on:
The dispatch, dated February 2010, warns that that Jamaica could be fertile ground for jihadists because of its underground drug economy, marginalized youth, insufficient security and gang networks in U.S. and British prisons.
Stage 3. Establish Sectional Control of Major Cities.
Population density 5% - 10% (France, Sweden, Netherlands).
First comes the demand for halal food in supermarkets, and the blocking of streets for prayers; then comes the demand for self rule (within their ghettos) under Sharia. When Muslims approach 10% of the population the demands turn to lawlessness. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any criticism of Islam results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam. In France which may be over the 10% range, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrassas. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death.
Stage 4. Establish Regional Control.
Population density 20% - 50% (Europe 2020?).
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues.
Stage 5. Total Control, Brutal Suppression, and Dhimmitude.
Population density > 50%.
Unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and jizya, the tax placed on infidels. As Muslim population levels increase and all infidels cower in submission there will peace at last. Dar al-Islam is achieved and everyone lives under Sharia and the Koran is the only word.
Almost a tenth of babies and toddlers in England and Wales are Muslim, census figures show The percentage of Muslims among the under-fives is almost twice as high as in the general population, according to a breakdown of census figures. The percentage of Muslims among the under-fives is almost twice as high as in the … Continue reading→
The Islamic future of Britain Britain is in denial. If population trends continue, by the year 2050, Britain will be a majority Muslim nation Vincent Cooper The Commentator, 13 June 2013 07:33 Britain is in denial. There is no real public debate on a historic event that is transforming the country. Mention of it … Continue reading →
A measure that would for the first time allow the benefits of current retirees to be severely cut is set to be attached to a massive spending bill, part of an effort to save some of the nation’s most distressed pension plans.
The rule would alter 40 years of federal law and could affect millions of workers, many of them part of a shrinking corps of middle-income employees in businesses such as trucking, construction and supermarkets....
Note the following example:
Whitlow Wyatt, 70, retired with a $3,300-a-month pension in 2000 after working more than 33 years as a long-haul driver. He could face pension reductions of 30 percent or more if Congress permits trustees of the hard-pressed pension fund to slash benefits.
Just imagine what havoc these cuts would work upon the personal budgets of many already-retired, elderly retirees under the age of seventy-five! Retirees who are over age seventy-five or disabled are exempt from the cuts.
The root of the financial troubles of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation is an inverted pyramid of support for the pension plans. There used to be four active workers or members for each retiree, but now the ratio is one active worker or member for every five retirees.
For decades, as both children and adults, the Baby Boomers drove our economy:
Almost exactly nine months after World War II ended, “the cry of the baby was heard across the land,” as historian Landon Jones later described the trend. More babies were born in 1946 than ever before: 3.4 million, 20 percent more than in 1945. This was the beginning of the so-called “baby boom.” In 1947, another 3.8 million babies were born; 3.9 million were born in 1952; and more than 4 million were born every year from 1954 until 1964, when the boom finally tapered off. By then, there were 76.4 million “baby boomers” in the United States. They made up almost 40 percent of the nation’s population....
Urban Infidel has the story with photos and videos.
Urban Infidel commented:
In the years since I first started going to this parade in 2007, it was obvious that the radical elements previously displayed had been tamped down for public relations reasons. This year, the Mohammed movie brought it all simmering to the top as you will see in the videos posted below.
Paul Ryan?!? Bad pick. Romney just threw the election, just like John McCain. Back in the early 80's, Devo made fun of this stereotype creating this image for themselves:
The image has become only more and more of a mockable stereotype in the years since.
That the Republican Party believes this is a winning image in this day and age, is sad. It's a demographic/psychographic thing. Romney and Ryan are two white guys. Mitt Romney is the perfect stereotype of white guy, and Ryan is almost that as well. Whites are a minority in this country. Yet whites make up a large portion of those who would vote for a Republican for President. White men are pretty much wrapped up. If Romney wanted to win he had to bring in other constituencies, which he could have done by picking Rubio or Jindahl. Instead, he doubled down on his own stereotype. It is not that a white man can not win the Presidency. It is that a stereotype white man stands little chance of winning the Presidency if he continually doubles down on stereotype. As Romney does, and has done, and has now proven he will do again and again. This is yet another boneheaded, tone-deaf, and impotent choice by the Republican party. Say goodbye to the election, and say goodbye to the economy. We're in it for the long haul. Cuba, here we come.
Since my "alarmist" book came out, I notice the British and European media have begun to meet me halfway:
A Fifth Of European Union Will Be Muslim By 2050
Britain, Spain and Holland will have an even higher proportion of Muslims in a shorter amount of time, an investigation by The Telegraph shows.
A couple of points. The "European Union" is a fairly meaningless statistical concept including as it does places far off the Muslim-beaten path (Estonia). What counts are real jurisdictions - first, the major cities, which are already on the brink of majority Muslim status, from Malmo in Sweden to the EU capital Brussels; and, after the cities, individual nations.
Critics of my thesis, most of whom don't seem to have read the book, like to obsess about the point at which Europe becomes 50.1 per cent Muslim: Steyn's full of hooey; it won't happen till 2100, or 2200, if ever. But as I say about 30 pages in. it is not necessary for Islam to become a statistical majority in order to function as one. At the height of its power a millennium and a quarter back, "the Islamic world" stretched from Spain to India, yet its population was only minority Muslim.
So what's the point at which a society starts to become Muslim in its socio-political character? My book quotes the 2005 Freedom House rankings: Of the 46 Muslim majority nations only three were ranked as free. But of the 16 nations in which Muslims form between 20 and 50 per cent of the population, only another three were ranked as free: Benin, Serbia & Montenegro (as it was then), and Suriname.
So 20 per cent seems a good starting point. For what it's worth, I'll bet the EU will be a lot more than one-fifth Muslim by 2050. As for those countries the Telegraph puts in the fast lane, a Netherlands or a United Kingdom that becomes 30 per cent Muslim will not just be more "diverse" but in ways both profound and trivial no longer Dutch or British. It's happening. You can argue about the speed, but not about the destination.
In his article "Stumbling Toward Eurabia" in the Spring 2008 issue of The Journal of International Security Affairs, Alex Alexiev, vice president for research at the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C., presents, yet again, the cold, hard facts of the coming catastrophic Islamization of Europe for all those who missed, ignored, evaded, rationalized and screamed "racism!" at such predictions the first few thousand times around.
In the summer of 2004... the prominent academic scholar of Islam Bassam Tibi predicted [that]... in ten years Germany will be the scene of large running battles between police and gangs of marginalized Muslim youth, bringing cities like Berlin, Cologne, and Frankfurt to the brink of chaos. This will be the result... of a trend that is already visible. Muslims are not interested in integration. They are, in fact, obligated not to integrate by the radical Islamic ideology dominant in their communities, and live increasingly segregated in parallel societies. The main difference between 2004 and 2014, Tibi believed,would be that the highly marginalized Muslim population would have more than doubled to 10 million, sharia would have been gradually introduced to Germany and the Islam preached there would be even more radical and resemble Nazi totalitarianism.
A study of attitudes among young Muslims taken in December, 2007, discloses that 44% of the respondents hold fundamentalist Islamic beliefs and that 25% would engage in violence against non-Muslims. Such evidence is consistent with conditions in other parts of Europe as well. Alexiev rejects the leftist cant that this is the result of economic neglect and racial discrimination and argues that it is the resurgence of radical Islam, taking advantage of both the population decline and welfare-state policies of the West that created this potential for catastrophe. A compensatory rise in European birth rates is "virtually impossible" over the next 10-20 years and even if achieved within the next 30 years would come too late to prevent the negative effects of Islamization.
In other words, this problem can not be bred out of existence. Nor was it entirely under-bred into existence. As Alexiev points out, such population shortfalls are normally corrected through immigration, but the realities of immigration in Europe today have instead turned the problem into a crisis.
The official policy of virtually all EU governements is to discourage immigration from outside the EU except for highly skilled professionals and a few other categories, such as family reunification and political asylum. Despite these restrictions... legal and illegal immigration, estimated at over two million per annum... has not contributed to the amelioration of the continent's demographic and economic crises; rather, it is actually making things worse.
The problem is... the fact that much of it places additional burdens on the social welfare system rather than contributing to its improvement... because most of the new arrivals enter Europe either as part of the "migration chain", i.e., family reunification, "mail-order spouses", etc., or as illegal aliens. The vast majority... lack job and linguistic skills and do not join the tax-paying labor force in any significant numbers, but rather work in the underground economy or enlist in the welfare rolls.
More serious than even the economic cost to the host societies is "the extensive and ongoing radicalization of the burgeoning Muslim populations" of the EU. However, Alexiev notes, aside from Britain, "most European governments... seemingly as a matter of principal, avoid collecting or publishing most relevant data of an ethnic or religious character" and "have avoided openly debating this issue, except for rhetorical flourishes about the need to integrate the Muslim minority" while "relatively little attention has been paid to the likelihood that... Muslim communities, if radicalized and unintegrated, could have a dramatic impact on political stability in Western Europe long before 'Islamization' takes place". In other words, radical Islam does not have to outnumber us in order to cause massive disruption of Western civilization. As Alexiev bluntly states:
Major demographic shifts are, of course, nothing new in history. Nor is the replacement of one dominant culture with another on account of a new demographic balance necessarily a cause for concern per se. Unless, of course, that new culture is dominated by the hateful, obscurantist and inherently violent Islamist creed that does not intend to coexist peacefully with others.
Please read it all. It is stark and horrifying, and it is appalling that the alleged leaders of the West still refuse to confront this reality.
