The apologizers for Islamic terror like to tell us that in the latest round of conflict in the middle east, the party responsible for it is not the state party. They would like us to believe that Hezbollahs position does not reflect the position of the Lebanese government, after all Lebanon has non-Hezbollah and non-Muslims living there. The logic then follows that a militant Israel taking punitive action on Lebanon for the deeds of Hezbollah is not acceptable.
Note that the chair of the OIC, Malaysia, is now letting the curtain slip a little and we are starting to see the hands which move the puppets.
The latest one to make that call is former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad."If Israel is receiving weapons aid from the U.S., the OIC should therefore give arms to Hezbollah," he was quoted as saying by the daily Utusan Malaysia in its Tuesday edition.
Syed Hamid said sentiments as expressed by Mahathir should be heeded as a warning the Muslim world is clearly frustrated. "I think it is better for the international community to take heed of this type of feeling. This type of feeling is shared by many members of the public and many of the OIC countries as Israel is seen to have carte blanche to do whatever it wants," he said. "Some suggested we supply arms. Okay, we should look at all these things," he said, adding Malaysia would still act "in accordance with the internationally accepted norms and principles otherwise, all of us would be involved in another war."
So many questions I don't know where to start
1) Hezbollah is a dubious party to a conflict not being a state. That the OIC and it's chair would show that they are weapon suppliers raises many questions especially since Hezbollah is not a state but rather an armed militia. Is the OIC oblidged to help a Muslim in any conflict? Can we then trust that Malaysia and her OIC hooligans are not supplying arms to Muslim seperatists in the Philipines (a country with which Malaysia has territorial disputes)
2) Malaysia claims not to sponsor terrorists but this gives lie to its claim. Can we believe that Malaysia would supply weapons to combatant parties half way aroudn the world but not supply weapons to Thai sepratists in south Thailand on its own borders?
The way things are turning now is extremely troubling.
2 comments:
This is Irans war with Israel,via its proxy army in Lebanon "hezbollah". Every
country knows this yet is content to sit
back and let the current fighting continue. It is my belief that if Israel
can not contain Hezbollah they will go
nuclear on Iran..
How people that once lived in relative
peace with each other came to this, is somewhat beyond common reason.
A core Islamic principle is that the worldwide community of Muslims (the 'Ummah') always support Muslims against the non-Muslims, whether in peace or in war. Facts, mitigating circumstances, etc. dont matter. This principle could also be called "Ummah Uber Alles".
Malaysia is simply being open about its bias and pro-Islamic tilt.
Malaysia is no friend of the infidels.
Once the OIC starts to provide support and weapons to the jihadists (whether it's state sponsors of Jihad like Iran, or non-state entities like the Hez), the OIC will be seen plainly as the enemy to the West that it always has been.
Post a Comment